Comment Re:But what if? (Score 1) 72
But by the time you get that, she'll be over 50, and not at all as appealing.
But by the time you get that, she'll be over 50, and not at all as appealing.
What you don't understand is the Python is often used as a method of invoking libraries that are written in more efficient languages. And for the layer that it handles it doesn't introduce unacceptable inefficiencies. E.g., you wouldn't want to do ray tracing in Python, but it's fine for calling a library that does that.
I'm quite sure quantum computers are valid. Whether they're useful is another question. I'll agree that it's not clear that general purpose quantum computers will ever be useful. (I won't agree that it's clear they never will be useful.)
OTOH, specialized quantum computers are already useful. DWave sells one design.
There really are good use cases for fission reactors. Solar can't handle everything, even combined with wind and the grid. (But close.)
E,g,, I think that the case for fission reactors on the moon is sound, though any particular implementation may be quite questionable.
These are going to be quick and dirty installations in order to power AI data centers for people that bribed trump. It's your taxpayer dollars going to finance AI slop.
Construction isn't expected to start until 2030 at the earliest. From TFA:
Energy Secretary Chris Wright cited “tremendous interest” among developers of data centers that would buy the power, as well as utilities and energy companies. The nuclear plants could begin construction by 2030 and become operational in the mid-2030s, Wright and other officials said Tuesday.
By that time, the AI bubble may have burst, or the grid may have gone even further into renewables, or both.
We need more power, but nuclear isn't the way anymore. I was a supporter of nuclear until around 2020, when I saw how fast solar and wind were gaining. Both have consistently shown enormous growth because they are not as specific in their land requirements, can be installed in small numbers, and the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for them has plummeted to become profitable even without subsidies. Storage is still a challenge, but we're seeing rapid improvements in that, too, with sodium batteries rapidly catching up in capacity.
TFA says that construction on these won't start until at least 2030, and if they make that, it would be amazingly fast for how reactors are built these days. In that time, wind is expected to expand by almost 50 GW and solar by 40 GW. Battery storage is expected to almost quadruple in that time. By the time the reactors are built, they will be a tiny fraction of the new power generation installed and they will probably be the most expensive part of it.
...and nothing of value was lost.
Great Scott! We just need 0.21 gigawatts more!
So what's your suggested alternative?
Karl Marx's system sounds pretty good on paper. It really does; I read the Communist Manifesto several years ago and it's really an interesting take on society and social organization.
But the USSR didn't work out so well. I suspect it's because human nature (i.e. personal greed, for lack of a better term) isn't compatible with Marx's utopia.
That's OK but the only reason many people buy American cars and trucks is to support American jobs.
When it's all robots might as well get a Tundra rather than a 1500. Or maybe BYD will come in with something soon.
We'll see how that goes.
The purpose of a factory is not to provide jobs.
It's intended to made widgets that can then be sold at a profit.
It's not a social welfare program.
The guys who built those giant ovens could have told themselves that somebody was going to be baking a whole lot of bread
Somebody wired up all those ICBM missile silos too. The ones who do think all of the above is just fine. There will always be someone.
Skipping the paywalled article I found these specs and was underwhelmed.
Sure it looks fine for playing mid games but my guess was something unique, unified RAM or a clever bus or something. It seems like a decently tuned Ryzen build. I do like the lower TDP on the CPU which should be doing less work.
A nice form factor for those who don't build their own.
Hopefully this is their entre into the PC world and v2 will have more innovations.
What's most cool is the generation of teenagers who will have default Arch/KDE instead of default Windows.
I have never detected even a single advantage of systemd. It didn't bother me enough tow switch distributions, but that's the best I can say for it.
I see so many names in the commit logs, but some standouts include: Blum, Cook, Torvalds, Solodai, Tyragu, Stitt, Bergmann, Wysocki, Panda, de Mello, and no doubt some I missed who have a large number of commits fixing this problem.
Thank to all who undertook this Herculean chore!
Elliptic paraboloids for sale.