... what will it do to Facebooks competition?

Also "regulating" a company the size of Facebook could easily become a case of the tail wagging the dog, e.g. when "coordinating" policies, writing "drafts" for legislation, structuring this censoring apparatus and good old revolving door politics.

This could result in Facebook not only "regulating" their own content, but also defining the rules for others.

The accounts could be renamed (applies also to tweets and references) and marked somehow.

I find it problematic already, that tweets can be deleted from a conservation robbing the answering tweets their context.

To my knowledge the vegan patties are grilled on another part of the grill, which means any animal fats "contaminating" them can only be mere trace amounts (and the 0% may still be valid if considered as a rounded number).

So what is the problem with an unnoticeable trace amount of animal fats in your food? They can't have any effect on health, and no animal will be saved if those patties are grilled on a different device.

That leaves only ideological or religious dogmatism as "reason" for the demand to use distinct cooking devices.

I honestly don't see how.

The experiments are concerned with the (mostly) electronic ground state in crystal lattices, i don't see how that can have a significant effect on the nuclei that would facilitate fusion reactions.