Internal documents list it as, "Todayland". :-)

Worst pick-up line ever. :-)

Don't know if it's actually true, but people have posted (elsewhere) that it's less expensive to buy round-trip tickets to Japan and and spend a week at Tokyo Disneyland.

Maybe just having the most money isn't his Paramount concern ...

It takes effort to clean up someone else's slop, even, or especially, AI slop, sometimes more effort than simply doing it yourself.

That will actually be for history to decide.

Disclaimer: European here.

4th epic heatwave this year in Germany right now. I'm currently in Karlsruhe and it's 37 degrees Celsius outside (too lazy to convert to bananas or whatever you guys use). Got an SUV rental and it's AC couldn't keep up this noon. Concrete on the Autobahn cracked open in the last heatwave and they had to close down to repair it. Right now NRW is seeing it's largest forest fire since ever.

I was up north on the island of Fehmarn at the start of the week. Summer was bearable there although I did get sunburn. Anything south of Bremen though has unbearable heat at noon. Not fun. The Rhine is at an all time low, you can almost wade through it ( this has never happened ) and Hungary is having an energy crisis because they had to shut down both of their fission plants because the didn't have enough cooling water. France is closing in an the same problem once again too.

Climate change is hitting us like a fist this year. Not fun.

So, the first 2/3 of Elysium ...

Merriam Webster defines equity as:

The Oxford Review expands on that and defines it as follows:

Sure, 'cause white men have historically had such a tough time finding employment and advancement over people who aren't. /s DEI initiatives are an attempt, probably flawed, to ensure people aren't hired over others just because they're white men - which definitely happens. The words behind the acronym - Diversity, Equity and Inclusion - are actually good things that can, and often do, provide benefits in the work place, unless, of course, your products and services are only for white men. There's an argument for being able to do what one wants with their own company, which gets murkier when it's publicly traded or government funded, but discrimination is discrimination, which can go both ways. Some people are okay with discrimination when it goes in their favor, which is what we're seeing in the DEI backlash.

... that you can't get out in 2 hours or less. If it's mission critical that is.

A high-end graphics company chip in a monochrome system. :-)

And both his son's pockets as they are investors in several domestic drone companies.
Google: trump son drone

Or maybe it's that his sons Don Jr. and Eric have invested in domestic drone companies and this will boost their value?

Company backed by Trump sons looks to sell drone interceptors to Gulf states being attacked by Iran
Eric Trump backs $638M Space-Eyes, McKinley Acquisition merger
The White House Intervened to Get a $620 Million Deal for a Company Tied to Donald Trump Jr.

Investors are chasing a company that achieves some kind of AI singularity. Let's set aside the fact that there's no reason to believe there is anything but diminishing marginal returns by making marginal refinements to current frontier models. Let's imagine someone hits the jackpot and gets, not even AGI, but a system that's as far ahead of today's frontier model are ahead of 2020's GPT 2.0 in performance.

Globally AI revenues are 150 billion, against a cumulative burn rate of 450 billion. A model that is a generation ahead of others would almost certainly capture the lion's share of that revenue.

If AGI magically appears as a Sam Altman has promised investors it will, a hundred million is way too low. Add, maybe, another zero to the revenues.

Conservatively, a safer assumption is that frontier models will get marginally better based on refinements in training and reinforcement and the other bits and bobs that go into these systems. The nobody is winning the lion's share of anything, at least overnight. But you have to define "safe". By "safe" I mean unlikely to lose money. But some investors are clearly defining "safe" as "having the greatest chance of owning a piece of the biggest thing ever."

I'm not following this super-closely, but if Anthropic is pursuing adding multi-step model based reasoning to their system, that could be the basis of a generational leap in capability. But if that is an approach that looks like it has a chance of working, then their competitors are no doubt pursuing the same thing. In that case you'd expect the revenue pie to grow as the scope of model utilty increases, but that growth to be split among several competitors. This could credibly result in a revenue stream for some of them that is as big as the entire industry's revenue stream today. But there's going to be hell to pay on the data center impacts end of things.