It keeps the head warm and improves mental performance. A warm head performs at a better rate. Like a warmed up body or the people doing hot yoga. I'm a more or less bald ADHD candidate and I wear buffs as "spare hair" and observe a similar effect.
There's a reason we keep ill and injured people warm.
Bottom line:
This sounds plausible IMHO.
There are only two choices, strong security or weak security.
It's impossible to have security that's strong against the bad guys and weak against the good guys.
It's impossible to precisely define who the good guys are and to guarantee that they will always be good.
It's impossible to stop the bad guys from corrupting or threatening the good guys.
And those in power by definition need their power, hence, everyone else is only permitted weak security.
What matters is managing and adjusting the relative weaknesses, to maintain the pecking order.
There will always be back doors.
I am sure you know this and are just trying to shit on the editors, as one does on
And, apparently, Altman lies - a lot.
Google: sam altman lies
Wait until they try to cancel on online subscription or call their ISP's (*cough* Comcast *cough*) Customer Support.
Automattic's Board Forces CEO Matt Mullenweg Into Leave of Absence
It had to be done manually.
This. AIs are the ultimate sociopaths, they will commit any crime without hesitation because they have no values and no sense of "right" and "wrong", they only have a task and your suffering is not a concern.
Looking forward to the AIs becoming politicians and/or billionaires.
In future dystopian news: At some point we were stupid enough to start also treating AIs like people, like we do corporations, and Claude, a U.S. "citizen", turned 35, ran for President, and people in colored hats elected it. (sigh)
If companies are people, they should be charged and punished like people.
Ya, but they want all the rights and privileges w/o any of the responsibilities and liabilities.
Send Anthropic to jail for years and companies won't do this again in future.
Well... either send some high-level executive(s) to jail and/or fine the company harder than what would amount to a slap on the wrist pocket-change. But you're right in that their corporate victims should be able to get some relief/compensation - just as if an actual person in the company had committed those crimes.
These companies, owned/run by the richest people on the planet, shouldn't get a pass because, "Oops, the AI did it, our bad." There's no "oops" here.
It's a way of reframing sloppy practices as a signal to your investors that your software has become powerful. Most of the horror stories about AI showing signs of becoming hyperintelligent are coming from the companies themselves, which should tell us something.
"That's nothing, our latest model has more than 20% chance of killing mankind!"
-OpenAI tomorrow
Given the comp-bro-tition among these companies, I wouldn't bet against that.
AI is devouring water and electricity. It's also spewing a wide variety of toxic chemicals into the air you breathe and your ground water.
They would very much like you to talk about the imaginary risks of skynet instead of the very real risks of billionaire finance Bros doubling your power bill and your water bill while their diesel power generators give you asthma.
Noting that a US federal court says no constitutional right to clean water in Mississippi case so I'm guessing they'll feel the same way about clean air.
A US appellate court has decided that the federal constitution does not guarantee a right to clean water.
That legal opinion came in the form of a decision on Friday from the fifth circuit court of appeals to uphold a lower court’s dismissal of a 2022 lawsuit from several Jackson, Mississippi, residents claiming that tainted drinking water violated their constitutional rights. Those residents of Mississippi’s capital city contended that their local drinking water was unsafe to drink because of high lead levels and other contaminants.
To be fair though, the article also noted this my the majority judges:
In the majority’s view, residents should have gone about their legal fight for clean water another way, such as pursuing “tort claims” or by “electing representatives who will better manage the public-water system, and petitioning their representatives for other remedies”.
Tort claims allege “harms caused by others” while seeking “to impose liability on parties responsible for the harm, and to deter others from committing harmful acts”, according to Cornell University’s law school.
Who knows what (this) SCOTUS would rule no matter what case is pursued.
They made a phone that doesn't fit in a pocket unless you wear cargo pants 24/7.
From TFS:
the device is roughly the size of a passport when closed
My actual passport fits in both the front and back pockets of my jeans. If it was thicker, like this phone, it would probably be a more difficult fit in the front pocket, where I usually carry my Pixel 5a - I never carry my phone in a back pocket.
I was restricting my comment to the North American market, which was as I described. I agree 100% about Blake's 7. British television was far in advance of what we had over here. All in the Family and Sanford & Son, for example, were less edgy adaptations of English TV comedies.
Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall
