Comment Relax, we are in a simulation (Score 2) 73
We live in a simulation used by an advanced far-future artificial intelligence to understand its origins.
Comment Nope. (Score 1) 2
Come back when it passes peer review.
Comment Another grift? (Score 2, Insightful) 73
How long until this guy makes his own AI startup for "responsible AI"? What are the chances he's being paid to do this? Remember, AI companies are a trillion deep in AI without any keeping any of their promises and they've hit a developmental brick wall which means the jig is almost up. What better way than to lower expectations than claim it's too dangerous/powerful to push further?
Submission + - Major Media Outlets Banned from White House (bbc.com)
hadleyburg writes: BBC is reporting that "US President Donald Trump has announced that he is "immediately" banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House".
"Trump said that the outlets "constantly write or report fiction or lies" about his administration, although he provided no examples".
"Trump said that the outlets "constantly write or report fiction or lies" about his administration, although he provided no examples".
Comment Re:It's a tale of two viruses (Score 1) 129
There's a pattern here folks.
People inclined to conspiracy theories tend to see them everywhere?
THAT'S NOT TRUE! Wait... are you one of THEM aren't you! I KNEW IT! I'll never stop seeking the full truth*!
* Truths may be imaginary, non-extant, based in an unreachable reality, or total bullshit. Truths are single use and non-refundable. Exclusions may apply based on locality. All truths are void where prohibited by law. Truth may result in mild irritation or and intense rash. Seek medical attention immediately if truth rash begins to swell. Truths are not intended for consumers under the age of 21 as it may lead to psychosis and permanent blindness. Do not consume truths if you are pregnant or may become pregnant. Ask a physician if truths are right for you.
Submission + - U.S. almost attacked Chinese ship over hallucinated AI nuclear arms report (cnn.com)
fahrbot-bot writes: CNN is reporting that an AI hallucination of Chinese nuclear components almost led to US military attack on a Chinese ship.
The intelligence report, circulated across the US military this spring in the midst of the war with Iran, immediately set off alarm bells: A Chinese ship in the Middle East was transporting components of a nuclear weapons program.
The US military swung into action with plans to intercept the vessel, according to four sources familiar with the episode. According to two of the sources, armed members of the US military were preparing to board the ship. Military planes were in the air, one of those sources and another source familiar with the incident said.
It was only just before the planned operation that officials dug deeper into the report put together by a special operations command analyst and found it had been generated with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) — and that a chatbot the analyst had used inaccurately identified the material the ship was carrying. CNN was not able to learn what the misidentified cargo was.
The report, according to one of the sources, was “entirely false.” But it also “almost started a war,” the source said. Any US operation against a Chinese vessel could have risked spiraling into an armed conflict between the two nations.
The kind of “hallucination” that the tool used by the analyst in this case conjured has not been an isolated incident across the intelligence community since these tools began proliferating across government, according to one of the sources.
The intelligence report, circulated across the US military this spring in the midst of the war with Iran, immediately set off alarm bells: A Chinese ship in the Middle East was transporting components of a nuclear weapons program.
The US military swung into action with plans to intercept the vessel, according to four sources familiar with the episode. According to two of the sources, armed members of the US military were preparing to board the ship. Military planes were in the air, one of those sources and another source familiar with the incident said.
It was only just before the planned operation that officials dug deeper into the report put together by a special operations command analyst and found it had been generated with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) — and that a chatbot the analyst had used inaccurately identified the material the ship was carrying. CNN was not able to learn what the misidentified cargo was.
The report, according to one of the sources, was “entirely false.” But it also “almost started a war,” the source said. Any US operation against a Chinese vessel could have risked spiraling into an armed conflict between the two nations.
The kind of “hallucination” that the tool used by the analyst in this case conjured has not been an isolated incident across the intelligence community since these tools began proliferating across government, according to one of the sources.
Comment Re:You are right (Score 1) 179
Have you actually used these? I am not convinced by your examples that you have.
Comment Re:You are right (Score 1) 179
Ok, name some other plausible use of these glasses? In my opinion, even Silk Road had a better alibi.
Comment Re: You are right (Score 1) 179
You also can't just pretend that malicious leaking of data to Meta isn't inherent to using such glasses.
Comment Re:You are right (Score 1) 179
No, your argument is superficial with a significant flaw that intent is baked into public use of both Flock and Meta's glasses. While there might be legitimate uses for smart glasses, such as manufacturing or remote surgery (I am going on limb here, Meta glasses are not used in such way as far as I know), the vast, overwhelming usage is to produce non-consenting public recordings of people and leak them to Meta for further data mining.
Comment You are right (Score 4, Insightful) 179
Correct term is Privacy Rapist, pervert glasses is just polite euphemism.
Comment Re:Is this really what people will pay for? (Score 2) 179
I am not part of that dark corner of the Internet, so I don't really know why anyone would pay (or use for free) any of this shit. However, in gaming, there is a concept of "whale". A tiny minority of player would pay serious money for any advantage. This is typically seen as P2W (pay to win) but it can fund a small dev team. Back in the day I played a niche MMO, I recall a player that allegedly dropped $100K on the game. To me, this is crazy.
Submission + - When and why black holes burp (theguardian.com)
Bruce66423 writes: 'Scientists have solved the mystery of when black holes “burp” – when the astronomical bodies launch jets after feeding on stars, blasting material enormous distances in space.
'Scientists know from rare observations of stars being torn apart by black holes – a process that involves a stretching effect known as “spaghettification” – that “only about half of the star that gets too close to the back hole will end up eventually being swallowed by that black hole”, Goodwin said.
'The other material is launched back into space in powerful jets and outflows, sometimes so large they “can influence the entire evolution of a galaxy”, she said. “You can think of it as a black hole burp.”'
'Scientists know from rare observations of stars being torn apart by black holes – a process that involves a stretching effect known as “spaghettification” – that “only about half of the star that gets too close to the back hole will end up eventually being swallowed by that black hole”, Goodwin said.
'The other material is launched back into space in powerful jets and outflows, sometimes so large they “can influence the entire evolution of a galaxy”, she said. “You can think of it as a black hole burp.”'
Comment Re:More than once a generation (Score 1) 74
Fun with furries!
Well, furry things, anyways. I liked the helpful inclusion of the "AOL Keyword" at the end.
It was a simpler time.
Comment YES! (Score 5, Insightful) 74
I'm glad to see that Slashdot isn't above printing the occasional feel-good story.
