You'd have to believe that its okay to run over law enforcement with your car while fleeing arrest and that it's perfectly fine to attack agents and their vehicles while armed. Both instances had an easily demonstrable lethal threat to the federal agents which makes their use of force justifiable. How far gone do you have to be to think that the actions of either of those activists were in any way lawful or peaceful in nature?
How can you have an investigation when leftist agitators forced federal agents to withdraw from the scene and where local authorities refuse to act? Any evidence was compromised by the same people who are crying foul. In the first case, the video evidence is conclusive on its own. In the second, events are less clear. However, even in the second case, you can't deny that the guy was interfering with the lawful duties of federal agents while armed after previously attacking an ICE vehicle. That's a far cry from the complete fantasy of the feds going around shooting innocent citizens. Stop attacking federal agents and bad things won't happen to you.
> the USA has the government executing citizens in the street with impunity.
Absolute propaganda. The lady that was shot by ICE was resisting arrest after intentionally interfering with federal authorities lawful duties. She tried to flee by car, pointed it at an agent and accelerated. The agent shot in self defense and the photos clearly show a gunshot through the front windshield. Your version is as abhorrent as the "hands up, don't shoot" lie where a cop shot a person that was beating on the cop as he was sitting in his cruiser.
The "nurse" that was shot was another activist intentionally interfering with authorities with prior video showing him damaging ICE vehicles while the agents were in transit. He was armed and got into a tussle with agents. At that point, you submit to arrest, you do not fight law enforcement. He reached for his firearm right after another agent had removed it. A gunshot rang out and agents reacted. While the source of the shot is unclear, the "nurse" put himself into that situation willingly. He wasn't a peaceful protestor. He wasn't observing law enforcement activity. He was a provocateur that learned the meaning of FAFO the hard way.
This persistent twisting of facts by the left has to stop. The federal government has full legal authority to defend our borders and is obligated to deport anyone that is in our country illegally, as is the duty of all nations. Denying this is akin to declaring that the world is flat.
That's why Europe doesn't have its own Google or Amazon or Microsoft. It's too hostile to business.
Then the feds apply tariffs or technology bans to the now-foreign businesses creating a need domestically which employs those people at new American companies. For a while it looked like China was going to dominate the tech sector, that's pretty much how that died. Not saying whether I think it's right or wrong, but it's now an observable pattern.
The size of the population doesn't matter to business if they're dirt poor. Other than being unskilled labor, which isn't something a company like Google needs.
The banks will adjust how they deal with credit scoring accordingly. They're not going to stop issuing credit cards just because the interest rates are capped. They may assess risk differently, but they'll still want the revenue.
Considering how much credit card debt people are saddling themselves with, wouldn't having cards cancelled and/or not issued be a good thing? Do you want to be hopelessly in debt? If you're not hopelessly in debt, your credit score will reflect that, and you'll be able to continue using credit cards responsibly. What's the downside?
Their push was for PCs with NPUs built in. That would host local AI workloads, not the cloud based stuff that gets handled by the "evil" datacenters. Problem is, those workloads don't really exist on the Windows platform, therefore the NPU is underutilized. It just needs a killer app, but there isn't one right now. People are gravitating to the cloud based stuff.
You probably also believe that Antifa is anti-fascism because that's their name. He was one of the people identified by the administration of being responsible for censorship in violation of our first amendment. Sure, they do it under the guise of "anti extremism". Our free speech rights have no such exception. Hate speech is free speech according to our courts. You're just proving my point. The US is on the right side of this, Europe is not.
Laughably predictable. Europe is violating free speech, but that's okay because of Trump. Any sane country would take a look at who is trying to enter their country, and they're going to filter out the bad apples. Maybe Europe wouldn't have seen so much violence over New Year's if they'd done the same.
"Roman Polanski makes his own blood. He's smart -- that's why his movies work." -- A brilliant director at "Frank's Place"
