Google does it. Google photos identifies people and scans their face, puts it in your album. Matches them up for it's slide shows or other things.
It's not new tech. People just think they're safer because they can tell when someone raises a phone to record them, but completely forget about cameras designed to be discreet.

Yeah, dramatically curbing them banking on the concept of people feeling like they bought it and forcing them to show that you're just licensing it for a period of time, forcing them to just be more open and honest about what they are trying to offer.
License, and how long that license will be valid for at a minimum, that would be awesome.

Let capitalism do what it does. That would help it.

Versus the many other camera devices that are smaller and less obvious and actually designed to be used convertly? You're not solving the problem of people being recorded in secret.
What kind of weirdo is recording your wife in the bathroom? Are you going to say another woman? Or who? Go ahead and say it.

Can you tell me what the Canadian national identity is? That would be great.

Minority cultures, you mean.

I think you're on to it.

Like many things, AI is subsidized to gain traction. Once the true costs are put on to consumers to run the models and what they're doing, demand will drop dramatically as measuring the change to using AI products, cost, ROI will have to be weighed much more carefully. When that happens, investors will slow on AI investments.Supply will start to catch up with demand etc.

Yeah I'm just basically saying the same thing you are, it's a bubble and people are expecting this one to pop.

Here's the proper title: Police actually investigate car theft as it affected rich person and consequences applied.

As usual, do whatever you want, but heaven help you if you steal from a noble.

!. Get AI out there and everyone to use it because it's useful. Allow reasonably powerful models.
2. Make the peasents..I mean..consumers feel like some control has been given to them so they're not nickle and dimed for simple HTML or programs that AI can make for users for simple tools.
3. Introduce more powerful AI and for security and everything else now, is locked behind a vendor that you can't get your hands on so you need to continue your life subscription to everything, and you accept the vendor since you're used to AI.
4. Company saves lots of money not needing humans to work, more money shifts from the bottom to the top..

Yeah I like this one. If a human gets it wrong they can be liable. So if we replace it with AI, let's make the CEO liable. Fantastic idea.

Fine, how about it's also done anonymously so you have no idea who is doing more or less screen time, and zero hints about who it might be.

Then you can just have open company policies if you see people getting too much screen time and workload and put in policies that reduce it.
Because it's not about figuring out enforcement, right?

That makes a lot of sense.

I didn't feel suddenly social media sites etc had developed better morals and was suddenly concerned about the content on their site being pushed by bots, misinforming people or making it a waste of time, it's actually because it's messing with their advertising and potential advertising revenue so now they want to push for verification.

Thank you for showing everyone the truth.

There is no high horse here. It's you flailing as you fall off of the one you thought you had. You want to shame and blame but refuse to bring up the real culprits that, reality, facts, physics, as we're all on same planet point to, but you don't get virtue signalling points for that, so you won't say it. Chicken.

Okay but, geographically where are you going to go do it?

Come on, say it, or admit what you really are by not facing reality and callking it out, like a virtue signalling twonk.

Sooooo...you're worried about the CO2. That's a super good concern, and you're right, you're talking about all the CO2 adding up, since it's all contained to this one planet and that's a major problem for all of us.

So I'm waiting for you to go tackle where the most CO2 tons enter the atmosphere from. Go have a talk with them and fix it out. Percentages mean nothing per person. Oxygen isn't going to fill your lungs because you contributed a lesser percent per person. Strong storms won't avoid you because you used renewable. Cheating by using per person when a vast majority of people are rual and poor don't count if the industries in that country pollute more than the rest of the world isn't going to fix anything, virtue signalling won't help when it hits the fan.

Go deal with that first, then you can talk to me about paper straws.

Asking for a friend