I've got criticism for Democrats.
Occasionally and vanishingly small levels, but yeah, very very rarely you let something slip.
I don't think MAGA is bad because they're partisan, it's because I think they support abhorrent policies that are bad for the country.
I think bad policies are bad, no matter who pushes them. Groups pushing them aren't all that relevant except to mark their partisan bias.
bad faith sweeping for Republicans
I've been extremely critical of them even in this thread. You're so partisan you can't even remember that part because you're too busy carrying water. Republicans have both bad policies and bad execution, just like their pals in the Uniparty Democrat branch.
You can cry uniparty all you want but it's a 2 party system
That's where you're wrong. It's a rigged system with the illusion of two parties. In reality, both do the same things: same debt, same wars, same prisons, same massive regulation, same authoritarianism (remember CV19?), and they even re-use the same lies (save children/stop terrorists).
No, not with partisans being the majority. That's for sure.
(and I think i can prove) one of them is clearly better for Americans than the other.
You have yourself jedi mind dicked into thinking that, clearly. Let's say for the purpose of a thought experiment that you're completely correct. The Democrats are, let's say 5% better, more honest, more effective, and less corrupt. That's not a reason to overlook all the horrible policies they both use in lockstep. That's not a reason to allow them to use the two-party system as a way to nullify & ignore democracy. You're not compromising to get that 5%, you're fucking everyone else on the 95% that's exactly the same by backing the current system.
I say "Here's why the debt is high and who is mostly behind it"
Not really. I'd summarize your expressed position as "it's the other guys fault and I won't hear otherwise." You're quick to point out that Republicans come out looking a little dirtier in some "who racked up the most debt" comparisons. Marginally it's true, some do: but you ignore the massive debt in general and the evil of letting the government accumulate it if "your guys" are doing it. The real problem you have is that you're also always jumping in to try to defend government intervention and government solutions (as long as your white knights in the Democrat party are the implementers). This is the same government that builds nukes, runs bio-weapons-labs, drops bombs on kids worldwide, etc... and yes, even when the Democrats are running things! They don't deserve support, even if their messaging is better or they have a marginally better track record in places you or I care about.
Declaring yourself as not participating doesn't make you better than me.
That's true. Who knows if I'm subjectively "better". It just makes me more skeptical and likely a lot more likely to be cogent overall than you who seems to want to give half the partisans (the ones on your "side" / "team") a pass.
So what's your option? Revolution?
I'd prefer the electorate wake up and vote better, but they are too caught up in a divide and conquer strategy that's straight outta "The Prince" and will rarely vote outside of the partisan ranks. There are a few things we could try. Maybe Swiss style direct democracy would help a bit. These "representatives" don't do a lot of representing. Nothing seems to fail quite like voting for a middle man with other priorities. So, I'd start there. The closest thing to a revolution I could support would be a judicial one were judges who won't uphold their oath to protect the constitution are dismissed and we start cutting thousands of unconstitutional laws outta the books and enforcing the Bill of Rights.