Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Forest management (Score 3, Informative) 22

OK, MacMann. You're a fucking idiot. Let's talk about some of the dumb shit you wrote, you fucking moron:

Bad forest management. We stopped clearing underbrush. We stopped logging. We stomp out every tiny fire that could have safely burned off all that underbrush so the level of dry underbrush grows every year. What is another word for underbrush? Fuel.

20% right as usual, Morty. We reduced clear-cutting of forests. We did not stop logging. We do not stomp out every tiny fire. Why don't you do some reading before running your sausage fingers? https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/...

Bad forest management would certainly be a contributing factor. I'd expect that even in spite of some global warming we could manage the forests in ways that would keep the wildfires from causing so much pollution. We can't be rid of forest fires completely since these fires are part of the natural process that maintains the forests, some tree species need fire to reproduce. There were forests and wildfires before humans arrived. With proper management we can aid the forests to recover from fires more quickly, and keep the fires from damaging populations of birds and furry woodland creatures. Oh, and keep the wildfires from damaging homes, businesses, and so much else.

A bunch of vapid bullshit and vague, worthless statements.

California is certainly the worst offender on poor management of wildfires, and things that can spark the fires like poorly maintained electric utility lines.

What an ignorant fucking statement, you cunt. The federal government controls and manages most of the forested areas of California. The feddy gov, run by the orange shitball, your daddy, is such a good manager, he poured a lot of water into the ocean to fight a fire hundreds of miles away.

I suspect the poor management of water supplies in California isn't helping. The drinking water for so many people must come from somewhere, could that be drying out the forests?

While it is best to assume incompetence over malice in any failure in government there should be a point in which the incompetence gets beaten out of government from lessons learned. With this kind depth and duration of mismanagement it is starting to look like malice. I'm not going to blame anyone in government for setting the fires, rather they set the scene for the inevitable wildfires to be far larger and more dangerous than they should be if the forests were managed properly.

You suspect? From your basement you never leave, except to huff and puff upstairs to grab some rice krispies treats your mom made? So somehow California steals the rain above forests and puts them in drinking cups? You're so fucking ignorant, it's amazing you can type. It's called the water cycle. Elementary school children learn this. You were too busy getting fucked in the ass by your PE teacher to notice? With this kind depth and duration of dumbfuckery, your posts are starting to look like malice. California didn't take away irrigation from forests. I just... What the fuck is wrong with you?

California will want to claim to be producing low CO2 energy but they've continuously failed. This is also a depth and duration of failure that is difficult to dismiss as mere incompetence, there's hints of malice showing. Clearly those in government will have to answer to the voters. This makes me wonder if the malice lies as much in the voting public as with the government. Do Californians want bigger and more dangerous wildfires?

California has failed to produce low CO2 energy? Motherfucker, get some facts. https://seia.org/wp-content/up...

I believe these are problems that can be solved, but we need people that want to solve them. If California wanted to see less CO2 emitted as that is contributing to global warming, the drying out of the forests, and therefore leading to more wildfires then there's plenty they could do that would be more effective than what they've done in the past. I guess they don't want it bad enough yet.

Perhaps you can help by no longer breathing? That would cut CO2 emissions. Go the fuck away.

Comment Re:Wrong again, idiot. You're really good at that. (Score 1) 147

Once again drinkypoo goes to great lengths to expose his stupidity for the world to see with another uninformed, idiotic Slashdot post.

Oh look, whoever you are. Nobody knows you.

The 90s and early 2000s was the peak of automotive engineering in the USA

And American cars were still shit. If you RTFA I linked you'll see that the best of the 90s and 2000s were not what was destroyed.

Now go off to cry to someone else about your tiny penis, you will not be missed.

Comment Re:King George the Third... (Score 1) 256

We're already in a second civil war. It was started by the left years ago.

We never finished the first one. The losers were allowed to keep their flags and their guns. Instead of trying to be one big happy country we should have freed all the Africans and enslaved the Southerners, since they love slavery so much. Then we could have them picking fruit right now.

Comment Re:Astonishing one company can do this (Score 1) 147

In fact, a significant percentage of them will probably get Windows 11 installed on them using the bypasses...

If that's the case, why won't the current owners just do that? Are we too stupid/lazy/rich to do that

Mostly too rich. There are potential problems we don't want to deal with, and will pay to avoid it.

so they can be used by people that get their power from coal-fired power plants and run native language OS versions with English keyboards?

They can probably get local character set equipped key caps from China.

Comment Re:There is already a safe subset of C++ (Score 1) 82

Closed world is like ethe transmission in a traditional car. All of the parts are created to exacting standards and fit together only one way. Transmissions are not user serviceable. Any modifications to the transmission likely degrade its functionality.

People can and do service their own transmissions, in particular doing a fluid and filter change is generally a pretty easy job. There are also modifications and upgrades to transmissions. You can buy "built" transmissions which include heavy duty parts which can handle larger power, torque, and/or shock loads than stock ones. There are "kits" of aftermarket parts which either address wear over time or even correct design deficiencies like either lazy or excessive engagement of clutches.

Comment Re:Kind of funny (Score 1) 75

He's talking about the money already spent and spending right now. Just the build out investments, given we're talking about trillions of dollars, must be boosting the economy.

What's the measurement? If it's "GDP" then sure, the economy is booming. But GDP is itself meaningless to sustainability, which is the most important thing to measure in anything you hope to keep doing. If you want to keep having an economy, for example, you have to keep having consumers who have money so they can participate in it...

Comment Re:The infrstructure will get reused when it pops (Score 1) 75

Just like we got a lot of cheap office furniture on eBay when the dot com bubble popped, I am sure there are going to be some firesales on cloud computing hardware or services when this horrid AI bubble finally pops.

Hardware, yes. But what will you do with it? It's only really good for a few types of task. Where it's GPU-based, as all the Nvidia stuff is, you could use it for lots of different types of tasks. But Services? Energy needs to get a lot cheaper for that to be feasible, because providing services on this hardware is predicated upon using a lot of energy.

Comment That's not how anything works (Score 1) 75

A bubble is "a good or fortunate situation that is isolated from reality or unlikely to last". What's good about it, profit for those who are profiting. Why's it isolated from reality, all three of those reasons. Why's it unlikely to last, reality is inexorable, no amount of ignoring it will cause it to change.

One bubble, at least three reasons why it's bubbling. Probably we could identify a bunch more, like nerd fantasy. One of the consequences of techbros being in a position to decide what society does with itself is that they will send us on tech-related wild goose chases.

The goal of making ourselves obsolete is typically self-defeating when we can't even agree to let humans have free time when they don't need to be working.

Comment Re:Astonishing one company can do this (Score 1) 147

C4C destroyed mostly old shitpiles with poor efficiency, so it was effective in reducing hydrocarbon emissions.

I suspect a lot of these machines will go to the third world and get refurb'd into PCs there, so people will benefit anyway. In fact, a significant percentage of them will probably get Windows 11 installed on them using the bypasses...

Comment Re:Already? (Score 4, Informative) 147

I've never used Windows past version 7. I definitely feel better off. 8.1 was ridiculous, 9 got lost, 10 peeked into your private life

Microsoft put the same telemetry they put into 10 into 7 and 8 via updates. Some of those were "updates" that included nothing but telemetry, sometimes they bundled the telemetry with actual updates so if you wanted one you had to have the other. There are scripts and other tools to remove those updates, but if you are not using those and you have been doing updates, they all spy on you.

Slashdot Top Deals

To be is to program.

Working...