You'll know we've reached that stage when there is armed conflict over control of Lake Baikal.
If you think you can escape transactional money grabs and lock-in by moving from VMWare to Big Blue as a hypervisor platform, you're kidding yourself. It doesn't matter if it's Z/OS or Openshift...it'll be a similar experience to getting gouged by Broadcom.
What exactly is being proposed here? Is this saying that venture capitalists will force the companies they back to use AI tools? And the venture capitalists will get a cut of these forced sales?
I told you, we should never have left the economy sitting out overnight. That's how you get oligarchs!
How expensive are the, uh, speakers for this?
Even after three decades, I am constantly amazed at how every company has a website but none of them has prices on it.
It is 10% of gamers in English speaking countries.
I've skimmed the article, and the article the article references. And this is meaningless, because "productivity" is not being measured in any rigorous way. It's all just vibes.
"Writing code is faster." What does that mean? Are you saying that more lines of code is more productive? (At this point, you sure as shit better not be, but.) Does it mean that the LLM can produce "good code" faster? How do you measure the quality of that code? (You probably aren't even bothering to.) Do you have a developer eyeballing the output code? (Liar.) Are you feeding the output into another LLM to test its quality? (You must have quite the token budget.) Are you counting bugs that crop up later, and strictly accounting for time it takes to fix them? (LIAR.)
CopyFail only affects kernels from 2017 on, nothing that new is running CPanel
1 Billion dollars of budget deficit = 1 Gramm-Rudman