Comment Re:Unclear (Score 1) 10
Probably LRO vs. Danuri
Probably LRO vs. Danuri
Even without Flock, had a cop spotted the car, they would have reacted. And probably in the same way.
Right, this is an indictment of policing in America, not Flock.
But since you clearly cannot trust the police, you double cannot trust them with access to Flock.
You cannot keep the police from getting access to Flock, therefore the only reasonable thing to do to Flock is destroy it.
Yes, this is only* because the police are corrupt, but since they are...
* Yeah, and some other people too, this hyperbole is for the purpose of the discussion in scope
I think we both know that ship has sailed
Good thing we hardly are made out of any bacteria.
Wait...
In which subfield is development not happening rapidly?
Won't you want those things to be software upgradable?
Except instead of pursuing policies that would help open models at the expense of Big AI, anti-AI people pursue just the opposite - policies that can cripple open source AI but have no realistic ability to meaningfully hurt big AI. It's so short sighted.
Actually, no, what they usually do is much more insidious: fingerprinting rather than watermarking. The fingerprint isn't actually included in the audio, it's included in a database. If they want to tell if the track was generated, they just try to match the fingerprint in the database. Can't filter it out of the track like you can with a watermark.
The two mainstream options (both about half a year old now, we're due for something better) are Ace Step-1.5 and Stable Audio 3 Medium.
Ace Step has full vocals with its music. See here for examples. The downside in my opinion (judge for yourself) is that it has Suno's flaw of sounding too "clean", "mainstream" and "uncreative", except even moreso (Udio was always much better than Suno at this, albeit "less well behaved" - but Udio is out of the game now).
Stable Audio 3 doesn't do vocals, though it has other useful features, like inpainting (great for fixing glitches in recorded tracks for example). In my view, it sounds a lot better. It can also be used to create sound effects. License is a bit more restrictive, though, if you actually care about that, but generally won't affect the average user.
Both are trained on fully licensed data and both are open-weights. So even if the devs released a version that included some sort of watermarking in the future (or someone developed a fingerprinting algo for the existing versions), you could just finetune them to break that.
TL/DR, if you want open source and want to just churn out a full track: choose Ace Step 1.5.
If you want open source and want to do instrumental tracks or to supplement manual work (such as your own vocals) or do audio editing: chose Stable Audio 3.
No they didn't, because Congress set the limit by statute and did not give the FCC authority to override it. This isn't complicated but you're still getting it wrong.
Some give him planes, some want him to build a resort on top of their genocide...
At this rate we will end ourselves with AGW before we achieve AGI.
But if not that, it'll be nukes or biotech.
It's looking increasingly like the great filter is that ambition exceeds ability while ability also exceeds restraint, and at the same time, a species gains the ability to destroy itself. TBF our sample size is small, but it remains compelling...
Hell, your parents were busing gene editing when you were conceived
Really? They were deliberately choosing genes? They selected them from a list? We usually only see that in science fiction, please provide more information on this amazing technological development!
They're all part of one creature with an inadequate brain and too many assholes. It's money and power (but I repeat myself) versus humanity and always has been.
I thought they were a hoax according to the liberal left. At least, that's how it was before covid.
Is someone paying you to say stupid shit? How do I get that deal?
Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives.