I assume they'd already jurisdiction-shopped and were expecting it to be rubber-stamped in a country that's somewhat more dysfunctional (try setting up a business in Greece some time) than other EU countries which would have given them a harder time over it.
If only those pesky Europeans were like the US, put Kushner on your board of directors, make a donation to the ballroom, and all of your regulatory problems just... go away.
Moving off a platform that auto-expires constantly in order to force you to migrate to a newer ($$$) platform that will also auto-expire shortly after you move to it does seem to be a good idea.
For reference, we recently declared VC++ 6.0, from 1998, unsupported, not because there's a problem with it but because getting it to run under the latest Win11 is too hard. Having said that, binaries built using VC++ 6.0 still run fine under the latest Win11, and that's a nearly 30-year-old dev.system which, admittedly, is quite a bit better than what MS is shipping today.
They also won't impact their use by scammers:
Percentage of scammers affected by the proposed rule: 0%
Percentage of domestic abuse victims affected by the proposed rule: 100%
Not saying that this is deliberate, but that this is one of those simple, obvious solutions that's completely wrong.
It's not solid-state, it's pseudo-solid-state, also known as marketing-solid-state.
Unfortunately the web site doesn't specify which of the pseudo-solid-state technologies it uses.
In particular, isn't Majorana the one where MS had to invent a new type of physics in order to make it look good? Or extend things into seven demensions [*], or some similar trickery?
[*] Yes, that's a deliberate spelling.
"If John Madden steps outside on February 2, looks down, and doesn't see his feet, we'll have 6 more weeks of Pro football." -- Chuck Newcombe