Comment Re:This is typical for Mac (Score 1) 132
Let's be real here, the lame x86 architecture should be dropped at some point.
If it's so "lame", did Apple choose to switch to it wholesale because they are also "lame"?
Let's be real here, the lame x86 architecture should be dropped at some point.
If it's so "lame", did Apple choose to switch to it wholesale because they are also "lame"?
So if I start a company, sell you some software and then go out a business, then what?
The obvious fix is to require that a version with no DRM be held in escrow and released if your company sinks, with prison time for execs if it doesn't work so that it actually gets tested. This would actually work, so it won't be implemented.
It sure seems extremely expensive.
Compared to what?
almost half of Americans have totally disengaged at this point and the other half believes themselves so powerless that (to use a Douglas Adamsism) they're only concerned with preventing the wrong lizard from being elected.
We are powerless to fix the problem by voting while the lazy cowards refuse to vote.
But we are also powerless to fix the problem with revolt while half of the people willing to do something want to do something shit.
Putin-senpai will never notice you no matter how far you open your mouth.
They snatch civilian men from the streets and throw them into the battle zone to meet their death, and they still have the audacity to talk about winning
Yeah, but what about Ukraine?
TL;DR: your entire point has been pointless.
Welcome to Slashdot!
The point is that with PCs I can slap either of my boot/root devices (or an image thereof) into basically any other modern-ish PC and it will boot up and sing songs for me.
How many laptop users frequently change their bootloaders? Is this a thing people do all the time, or just the first time transitioning from Windows to not-just-Windows?
That's literally my point. Thanks?
Who wants an "AI Autopilot" to perform actions in their name? Even if 25 years, if AI is so good that it's flawless, people still will be double-checking it.
If AI were flawless, then it would have a reputation for that, and people would trust it. As it is, its reputation is very bad, and a lot of people still do. If it were somehow flawless, then I would want it, but there's not even a concept of a plan of how to get from here to there.
"Autopilots stay active in the background, understand how work gets done across your apps and systems, and take action without needing to be prompted each time," said Omar Shahine"
Actual autopilots require constant oversight, whether you're on a yacht looking or for shipping containers, or in a plane watching for mountains. That's why it's a good name for Tesla's Almost Self Driving misfeature. On that basis it's actually sort of a good name for this, in that so will these AI agents, though they won't be getting it.
If they wanted to give an air of confidence, though, they would have named it more cleverly than this, and without using a name already in common use for a semi related product.
I suggest general operating LLM enterprise management, or GOLEM
Why my uninformed reddit post is on
WTS
YMBNH
That's why we sign long-term supply agreements when we choose a hardware design.
That's great for you, but irrelevant to users buying laptops, which is the topic at hand.
Trump has no idea whatâ(TM)s going on.
Yeah, but that's the normal state of affairs, you don't need to point it out.
Iâ(TM)m also curious how this could be considered âoeconservativeâ. Donâ(TM)t they hate the government meddling in their affairs?
BUT MUH NATIONAL SECURITY! OF COURSE TRUMP SHUD DO WHUTEVER HE WANTS FOR THAT!
offering an encrypted cloud and had no way of taking backup
Which is, of course, nonsense. Nothing stops you from making a copy of encrypted data. What sucks is that for a backup, you likely can't do incremental.
Holy shit new product idea, you've heard of chocolate milk...
IVERMECTIN RAW MILK
Make sure the cap on the bottle is red. You literally will not be able to keep it in stock.
"I am, therefore I am." -- Akira