Bullshit.

About the only thing secure boot really protects from is the evil-maid. All other cases affecting most users by the time something is in a position to modify the kernel or boot loader it was already in a position to do all the damage that would matter to that person.

You had root on my box, you have already had the opportunity to crypto ransom me, just vandalize my system in general, find and extract any sensitive data in my home directories and on any mounted volumes.

Even advanced persistent threats for the most part are not going to be trying to spliot the pre-boot environment, if I want dwell time on a corporate network I want to compromise assets that are usually always online.

In fact I would suggest for most users of home PCs anyway (to include laptops that rarely if ever travel) are less secure for using secure boot and even FDE. Most of them are one bad update or certificate expiration away from rendering their data completely inaccessible and unrecoverable. We know most of these users have no backups, and the tiny percentage who do have never tested them. -That is the opposite of security folks.

FDE does make sense for corporate environments and secureboot probably does as well but it has not f***king business at home and should NEVER be acceptable as being part of any requirement. It serves only one real use there denying people freedom to do what they like with their own hardware. It does nothing but enable DRM, and it does so at the cost of massive potential harm to the end user.

Only if it is in the public interest to destroy bitcoin.

Imagine if one person were suddenly revealed to unilaterally posses sole authority/ownership over 1/10th of dollars in circulation with no checks, or limits on how or what they could do with them, when or how fast!

Do you think that would do much for dollar confidence? I think likely lead to a pretty immediate discounting of the dollar probably around 10% in real value. The impact on Bitcoin would be a great deal more pronounced because Bitcoin is so much less liquid.

They (Iran) obviously chose it because it is at least in the short term comparatively difficult to sanction but also not to difficult to convert. It would not do them much good to collect tolls in some other currency and subsequently have US diplomatic pressure cut them off from the banking networks that generally handle that currency.

I am not saying that Bitcoin isn't highly traceable and that the US and other governments wont try and won't ultimately succeed making it so punitive to accept payments (in bitcoin) from Iran that Iran has to trade their bitcoin at a significant discount to those wiling to launder it and / or accept having tainted funds they can't spend a lot of place as well. That will happen, but will take some time to become really effective.

It does leave you wonder if the people who whisper in Trump's and Bibb's ears and their friends who might whisper in the ears IRGC types might indeed have provoked this whole thing in order to create a situation Bitcoin or some other crypto-currency could be forcibly inserted into the "international system".

It is interesting to think about because I do still believe in light of hyper-sonic missile and drone tech, and expanding Chinese influence there were / are good strategic reasons to remove Iran as an international player right now, for the US. Attacking Iran was a smart move... Letting them survive as even a regional power isn't. The ability to fight them is determined by the domestic clock on war powers. Trump is an idiot for wasting two weeks on this cease fire, he should economically disabled them, finishing it. Whoever he listened to on accepting those terms is not advising him well. We should have at least destroyed their remaining oil infrastructure, before any pause.

It's not difficult - Iran must be balkanized if Israel is going to conquer the Middle East and expand its proper borders to "those promised by God". They will demand a regional empire beyond their borders as a "buffer zone".

The Eschatological Christian Zionists want them tp destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque and build the Third Temple so Jesus can come back. Much of the Senior Brass at DoD (or Department of War Crimes) believes in this.

Is it all absurd and crazy? Doesn't matter, it's what motivates the people with nukes.

That and Trump being blackmailed with Epstein Tapes. The news says it's specifically an audio tape of a phone call between those two.

This is what the people who want peace in the world are up against. We can't counter what we deny.

> when your investigative toolkit is journalism

Exactly. The English Majors went where other investigators have previously gone and ruled out.

The stack of blockchain, Merkle Trees, halvings, etc. show a level of insight a quantum above Hashcash.

There's noting wrong with being "quite good" but "engineering genius" is something different.

Besides, Satoshi would never have stood for not funding mining with txn fees. The BTC chain is in danger of being unmineable very soon.

I bought some paper books from Amazon in 1998 and they still work like the day I bough them.

Excellent support after 28 years.

When you have a product made from leftover rejected parts the supply is guaranteed to be limited.

So you hype it as "for a limited time" and people go hog wild with FOMO.

coming soon: "The Neo is Back."

Yeah, "LLM's are gods" and "statistical ML networks are good at finding defective code patterns" are extremely different claims.

The people who are True Believers on both extremes look pretty silly.

I appreciate really good closed captioning while having no use for chatbots. Both ends get to call me a heretic!

Just watch the patches and CVE's trickling out.

It's not like OpenBSD is going to sit on a vulnerability for 90 days or whatever.

Issuing a patch doesn't give away the details about how it was found.

To be fair I just wasted a week tracking down a radio telemetry problem because of a forum post that many people said worked great but it definitely pulled a pin high that was supposed to be low, which shut off an antenna.

Only diving into the spec sheet and some sample embedded code convinced me that the forum post was exactly wrong and after making a simple change to do the opposite did all the telemetry devices mesh up and start reporting correctly.

So ... how does 90% compare to human content?

A wrinkle is that everybody knows humans are flawed and too many people treaty the LLM as omniscient.

Why should anybody care if this drives electric bills up to $1000/mo for the typical household?

We have unlimited energy, no?

Dipshits aren't creating a global energy crisis right now.

The world economy isn't headed for a global depression.

Natgas should be burned for LLM hallucinations and cats driving motorcycles, not converted into fertilizer to stave off a massive African famine.

Western woke governments haven't spent the past fifty years blocking new energy generation at every opportunity.

Right?

Don't invite the guillotines, dudes.

Why not notify their electric company to cut their power to halt infringement?

Or their water company so the house is uninhabitable?

The Courts need to recognize that Internet has become a necessary utility and that the music companies need to deal with the individual directly through the Courts, not in a lazy clandestine way.

Grande seems based.

Well shoot, even the politicians jobs are not safe then!

I am very disappointed in Trump, there is no reason to give Iran and Islam in general credibility by labeling it a civilization.

Maybe we should just cool it with the guilt by association stuff. Yes Bill was friends with Epstine, and sure Malinda left and it looks likely because he a philanderer; but we don't really have any direct evidence he is a child molester.

There are lot of people who were and are important in terms of contribution to our society, who may at some point associated with an unsavory character or two. This is the trouble, where are lines. Why wasn't Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers disqualifying? He knew or reasonably could have know his opinions and involvement with terrorism, isn't Obama a terrorist by extension? How about everyone involved in Harvey Weinstein movie? His transgressions were ostensibly an open secret in the Hollywood community, some the victims were likely underage so we are in the same space as Epstein there, yet almost none of these people are considered untouchables now? why?

Epstine made it his business to get into the business of literally anyone with money or influence he could. I think there is a big difference between asking:

how is it the guy avoided the trip to Federal-pound-you-in-the-ass-prison for as long as he did?
Who was complicit in protecting him?
Why?
When will we bring them to justice for perverting justice as was obviously the case?

and this desire of some to try to tar everyone they don't like who happened to have gone to the same dinner party once.. One is witch hunt the other is not. Gates might indeed be abuser, but if we are going to treat him like one, even in the court of public opinion someone should be able to cite some harder evidence, than has been turned up so far.