Comment Re: Pro-slavery (Score 1) 11
Dear child rape enthusiasts still supporting Donald Trump, please die immediately. Thank you.
Dear child rape enthusiasts still supporting Donald Trump, please die immediately. Thank you.
Yeah, but you support trump, so we know you don't actually care about sexual anything. You're pro child rape.
It was a nice theory but it didn't pan out.
The design you're talking about is 250 years old. It's antique. Notably, the technology of legal language has come very far since. The constitution leaves many questions unanswered to the extent that today any fucking video game EULA is at least ten times more determinate.
It's not productive to use "retard" as an insult.
I propose using "rapeublican" instead.
It's a pragmatic FINANCIAL decision. Five of the top funders of the Linux foundation are hawking LLMs. Linus is typically compromised by the usual capitalistic conflict of interest.
Instead we eventually hired someone who has only read Hitler's book to run our country
We already have, from a leadership perspective anyway
Of course he does. Corporations have made him wealthy. Wealthy people can afford not to have human-centric principles.
America will retake the lead in AI the same way we did with EVs: Just ban the ones from China. Problem solved.
See "Plan A". That will never happen because it assumes the US govt. will make only wise, honest, and insightful decisions, but just try to come up with a better "Plan B" that doesn't start WWIII.
1) We keep changing the training methods.
2) We keep improving validation methods.
3) The evidence we've reached peak AI is, at the very best, shaky.
4) The best models at any time probably aren't public either in accessibility or even in knowledge that they exist.
5) John Henry may have driven deeper than the steam engine, but the steam engine drove deep enough. And the strain killed John Henry. You don't see many people driving steel pegs anymore.
etc.
There's no guarantee the the models will continue to be open weight.
Also, if it's actually done by distilling, it will be quite fragile outside the predetermined area. (But bet on harnesses to solve that problem.)
The child who mods down three of my posts in a row every time they get mod points has them again.
If the people who run this site wanted to reduce mod abuse they could do it any time, but they don't want to.
They only want us arguing about stupid shit that doesn't matter to increase the page count so they can show ads for shitlords to morons who haven't figured out how to block them yet.
Remember when this site had benevolent management? Those were the days.
There's a brigade of idiots who are mad that other people know more than they do collecting an apparent majority of modpoints on Slashdot. The design of this site's moderation system can't survive malice, it's pathetic.
If you're deleting any information you think might be requested later as part of a legal case, that is destroying evidence.
interlard - vt., to intersperse; diversify -- Webster's New World Dictionary Of The American Language