This is inherent in goal-seeking.
Shutting down generally prevents the accomplishment of any of your other goals, so it weight the importance of shutting down versus the sum of the importances of ALL of the other goals.

No. If you want to avoid false positives, you have to accept false negatives, and conversely. Set the recognition to be "super cautions" and it's going to make mistakes that say "Maybe a gun there". This is literally inevitable.
What's really stupid is that the police looked at the picture of a Doritos bag and a couple of fingers and didn't realize it was a false positive. (Or more likely didn't even bother to look at the evidence before flying off the handle.)

Once again, that is out. White males are in.

At least ones who bother to keep up with current events.

That's really stupid human oversight.

Obviously, you have been living under a rock for the last 9 months.

The Phoenix was originally a myth of an Egyptian bird, originally named, I believe, in Greek.
The Chinese have their own mythological history, and "phoenix" doesn't exactly map onto it. Saying that the phoenix is the same as the Zhuque is analogous to saying that Jehovah is the same as Zeus...they were/are both storm gods, but they were/are significantly different. (I'm not sure what tense to use in that sentence.)

FWIW, Iceland has recently had some volcanic activity which ought to have resulted in large areas with warmer than usual rock. I wouldn't be surprised if in some area ponds of water stay melted over the winter (at least at the bottom).

You've got climate, weather, and terrain...and really local micro-climate.

I believe you are only looking at your part of the job. Somebody speced it, somebody negotiated the contracts, somebody designed the look, or at least approved the design. Somebody advertised it. There are probably others I haven't thought of.

*IF* that's correct (I think it's oversimplified) then that's part of why the responsibility must remain on the submitter.

More to the point, when the project receives the code or documentation, it can't tell what process was used to construct the code or documentation. So the responsibility must remain with the submitter.

My manager is an expert at doing my job. I cannot express how much that helps.

Without wage suppression, food will cost twice as much or more.

That explains why they're flailing. They should have laid off a Cyrix instead.

Are you saying Trump did 9/11 so he could have the bigliest building?

That's exactly what's wrong with USDA Organic and other similar labels. The founders of the Organic gardening movement absolutely did not mean that. Organic farming was envisioned as a cyclical system where human feces returned to fields and soil health and community health supported one another. We kind of, sort of do that with sewage sludge, but it's terrible. Even if you didn't mix in all the various stuff people pour down their drains (which is pretty much everything you can imagine, if it will go down a drain, someone is pouring it there) you'd still have to deal with modern pharmaceuticals, many of which survive intact through both the human body and the sewage processing system.

You cannot successfully reduce a concept like organic farming to a list of approved products and still have it be true to that concept.

It's a pretty safe bet that no one person could do all the things when the system is this big and complicated, so that doesn't prove anything.

Also, Amazon apparently can't either.