Comment Re:The solution (Score 1) 58
This is actually a legitimate solution to some classes of problems - you have an overseer AI for your natural language interface that delegates tasks to subordinate AIs using LLMs tuned for specific tasks.
This is actually a legitimate solution to some classes of problems - you have an overseer AI for your natural language interface that delegates tasks to subordinate AIs using LLMs tuned for specific tasks.
It's worse than authoritative - it's kissing your ass.
You: "Hey, AI, I think the world is flat and rests on the back of an infinite stack of turtles"
AI: "That's a great, here's how that works: [blather]"
People love having their ass kissed. If you don't have control over your ego, you're going to accept AI hallucinations more readily.
"Brain fry" makes it sound like the workers are failing, but it's not them. There are ways AI can augment your job - I use it as a quick way to search and compile relevant results into something I can use, and occasionally to produce simple snippets of code.
If you're a low-skill coder trying to be an expert because you have AI to 'help', then your manager did an awful job of understanding both AI's capabilities and yours. If you're a high-skill coder and your manager expects 10x the output from you after firing all your supporting coders to be replaced with AI... same deal.
On the other hand, if you're an occasional low/mid skill guy usually working solo like me, AI will make your life a lot easier once you learn to spot the hallucinations.
> All in all, it was just
My father often said that if you want tits and explosions to watch with your brain turned off, you watch American. If you want something that doesn't spoon feed you, watch British. If you want to commit suicide, watch something Scandinavian.
Things have evolved a bit since those days, but it's not the worst general rule to start with.
And that the 'Newtonian' physics of Gravity wasn't.
I'm a huge buzzkill. I can watch Pacific Rim with a smile on my face, but tell me you've made something realistic when you haven't and it nukes suspension of disbelief for me completely.
For attracting venture capital, about 10 years ago.
Every time Hollywood sells a movie as 'realistic', it's turned out to be bullshit. The trade mags and entertainment reporters repeat the lie, but that doesn't make it true.
I'll be watching this movie soon, it looks fun. I will not expect them to get physics anywhere close to correct enough that someone with a decent high school physics class under their belt won't see where they got it wrong.
If speed limits were enforced, they would be abolished tomorrow. They only continue to exist because most people can break the speed limit for years without getting a ticket.
If drivers received a fine every time they broke the speed limit, politicians houses would be burning down the next day and the law would be abolished the day after.
You know why encryption is legal despite Bush and Clinton's best attempts to prevent it?
Because Gen-X kids risked a decade in jail for breaking Federal law to ensure the code got out there and everyone had it. It simply became impossible to regulate because anyone anywhere in the world could download the code and run it.
Today programmers won't even say 'no' when governments demand they ID all their users.
Because it's not about age. It's about eliminating anonymity online.
There were laws requiring that escaped slaves were returned to their owners. I presume you would have obeyed those laws, even though they were immoral.
> You live in a country with laws.
A country with laws, yes. A country with law, no.
It's ludicrous to tell people they should obey the law when none of Epstein's clients have been arrested and probably at least half of the business owners in the country would be in jail if the laws on employing illegal aliens were enforced.
If an escaped slave had turned up at your house in the 1800s asking for help, would you have followed the law and sent him back to his owner? From your post, I'm guessing you would have.
I know a few Christian Nationalists. None of them are pushing for "Age Versification" and most are against it because it's clearly just another step toward The Mark of the Beast where people won't be allowed on the Internet unless they bend the knee to Satan.
This push is coming from the communists and WEF-bozos who want to eliminate anonymity on the Internet. Literally everyone who's been following this for long knows that.
Which is why you see support for it from both "left-wing" and "right-wing" governments. They both have the same hands shoved up their behinds.
I just bought a new fridge. I really would have liked a big tablet on the front and the interior camera to play with... but the manufacturers insist on using their custom Android you can't do much with, and it must always spy on you and feed you ads.
So my new fridge was a lot less expensive and doesn't have a built-in screen.
Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket. -- George Orwell