I asserted that Stern was an international communist,
Indeed you made that claim.
and produced research proving such.
No, you provided no such research. Perhaps you meant to and forgot to include a link? I'll give you a chance to provide one now.
You haven't offered one fact throughout any of this.
Then apparently you are not reading what I write. I can't fix that for you, you will choose to read what you choose to read.
.You just show up and wag your finger and lecture me about my "behavior"
Show up? I started this thread. I have pointed out many times before how hard to the right slashdot leans. You can pretend otherwise if you want. As for your behavior, you haven't provided any facts - while launching into one baseless attack against me after another - so it is about all you give me to reply to. If you would care to provide an actual fact, we can discuss it.
and pretend that your delicate sensibilities have been violated somehow by my "tone".
I never once claimed to be "violated", for whatever you think that means. You have, however, claimed more than once that I or others did that to you.
Try and add the FACT that temp data is being manipulated and corrupted to a conversation on global warming; see how that goes. http://realclimatescience.com/...
Where does the data come from? The blog claims it exists but offers no source whatsoever. Why should I believe them when they have a very obvious agenda?
Try to contradict a Black Lives Matter activist by giving proof that there is no such thing as "Driving while black" (at least in New Jersey) http://www.city-journal.org/ht... and see how that goes
First of all, that is from 2002 - it's well over a decade old. Second, it is discussing speeding on a stretch of freeway and it is discussing the rates at which drivers are pulled over for it - it is impossible to actually say how many people are speeding over a course of time as it is impossible to examine every one of them. Third, the "driving while black" pertains as much to driving through the city as anything, and more specifically is about being pulled over for a trivial - or even wholly fabricated - reason.
How in the world would you know if Slashdot was leftwing, if you've never offer a rightwing opinion?
That makes no sense whatsoever. Slashdot routinely shows itself to be hard-right. Why would I want to offer up a voice to the choir - especially when it contradicts my own beliefs?
For virtually every article on Slashdot where there is a leftwing opinion, try adding a rightwing one.
I don't have time to wait for "leftwing" articles, they show up extremely rarely here. I comment on generally 1-2 a week and I'm not going to hold my breath for the needle to fall into the haystack.
That's how lefties roll; they "moderate away" anything they don't want to hear.
You've shown repeatedly how you earn the poor karma score you have. Try discussing matters in a mature fashion, using actual facts, and we'll see what happens. Sitting around crying about your imagined conspiracy does not help you at all.
In other words, it doesn't happen. I thought maybe you'd be able to provide facts to the contrary, but you have so far completely and utterly failed to do so. Care to try yet?