Comment May I see it? (Score 1) 80
Chalmers: Uh... Aurora borealis!? At this time of year, at this time of day, in this part of the country, localized entirely within your kitchen!?
Skinner: Yes!
Chalmers:
Skinner:
Chalmers: Uh... Aurora borealis!? At this time of year, at this time of day, in this part of the country, localized entirely within your kitchen!?
Skinner: Yes!
Chalmers:
Skinner:
No, the argument was that the secret never gets stored on the server.
With a password, even if it's hashed it can be recovered with a dictionary attack or just brute force. And that's assuming they did the hashing properly - better to just remove the possibility entirely.
Passkeys only require a public key to be stored.
Another advantage is that it eliminates password rules and the possibility of them being weak.
Thank you for the explanation. But adding a passkey to an account without removing the password just increases the attack surface. So many services keep offering to do that.
Yeah...I made that word up. Dunno what else to call it given it's a graphical (writing) error but it doesn't involve typing anything given you're using a glide keyboard.
I like "glidographical", but maybe chirographical error would fit too... https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki...
Are there any definitions of 'open' left for them to violate?
Not many! I guess they could stop using TCP/IP entirely.
We could fix this tricky programming issue by regularly adjusting the earth's orbit....
The time-honoured approach: fix the software problem in hardware. I like it!
" The scientists didn't permanently remove the subjects' moral sensibilities "
I think they mean " The scientists
Perhaps the scientists tried it out on themselves first... The magnetism made them do it!
Those settings are complicated And even now I can't hide 1) my friends list from the public
Just for reference, I think I managed that one based on these instructions: http://news.cnet.com/8301-19518_3-10416524-238.html
> Real physics is cool, but it doesn't often make for good arcade games.
He wrote *physics* based, not *astronomy* based.
And, just to clarify, I'll settle for unreal game "physics" - I just want to see asteroids bouncing off each other instead of passing through.
Modelling light-speed propagation, quantum mechanics and/or quantum gravitation are strictly in the nice-to-have basket.
The mods sometimes do mod a good joke "Informative" or "Insightful" to add more fun to it
It's true. It's unfortunate when people don't "get" satirical moderation.
Two wrights don't make a rong, they make an airplane. Or bicycles.