Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Less than 10% of plastic is recycled (Score 1) 35

Greenpeace found that no plastic meets the threshold to be called "recyclable" according to standards set by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation New Plastic Economy Initiative.

Once again, the environmentalist fringe has set standards so high that they are impossible to meet so that they can berate folks for not meeting them.

Meanwhile, PLA 3D printer output can be trivially mechanically shredded and extruded into new filament several times. It's hard to say that PLA isn't recyclable with a straight face.

Comment Re:"modified them to make free calls" (Score 1) 31

+1. In my home town, the pay phone by the high school was used for exactly two things: calling parents to pick kids up after away games and calling in fake bomb threats(*) to get out of tests. I would expect similar behavior from public phones today, sadly, minus the kids calling their parents part.

* When I was a freshman, this is what the seniors told me people had done in previous years. I cannot corroborate the story with any actual evidence. Also notable: this was in the early 90s, before school shootings and bombings were really a thing.

Comment Yes, but ... (Score 1) 34

the Aurora Driver, can detect objects in the dark more than 450 meters away

... can other pedestrians and drivers detect the truck in the dark? So the Aurora Driver can detect a pedestrian at 450 meters. But even if they step out of the landscaping strip in the median 15 yards in front of the truck?

I know where all the hobos hang out and I'm prepared for this kind of stupid shit. Same thing near bicycle trails. Are the trucks that smart?

Comment Re:You're really stretching the definition of meet (Score 1) 146

Maybe it's better to say you will never in your life notice a trans person. I mean unless a multibillion dollar propaganda Network goes out of its way to make sure you do...

Yeah, likely true. Also, if you're intentionally looking for them, half the people you think are trans probably aren't.

Comment Re:paper forms (Score 1) 146

I don't have a problem with filling out the forms by hand. The problem is that you need to know *how* to fill them out, which in the past, when I had to fill them out by hand, took hours of reading IRS publications. If you just worked at a job, didn't own anything, and had no deductible expense, not a problem. But if you own anything, whether stocks, bonds, house, or even a car, or give things to charity, lotsa luck reading all those publications. Or, if you moved for your job, or had expenses related to your job. Or had a side gig. Or any number of other things where it's not obvious how to handle them for taxes.

That's really entirely the fault of laziness by the IRS and/or Congress. We should have laws requiring all of those companies to provide the complete set of information necessary to file your taxes in a computer-digestible form. There's no excuse for having to manually change several *hundred* lines one at a time to tell TurboTax that they are short-term or long-term gains, or whatever the one random piece of information that it needs from my Edward Jones statement every f**king year on a third of the transactions because it is trying to parse a d**n PDF file.

What makes it a nightmare is that even though all of the forms theoretically have compatible fields, they aren't actually standardized in their formatting, layout, which fields are omitted, etc., and that's true even for the easy stuff like 1099-INT, much less nightmares like 1099-B. And they are provided in formats that are intended for human consumption, not software consumption, so they're having to do crazy amounts of interpretation to figure out what the numbers mean and how to correlate them with other things on a page. This is the stuff of nightmares.

Instead, these data formats should be standardized with a mandatory standard format (XML, JSON, etc.) and shared schema. Providing data in that format should be a hard requirement for all financial institutions, and if a financial institution's data is unparseable by standard tools or is wrong in any meaningful way, the company that provided it should be on the hook for the cost of any additional interest and penalties caused by the taxpayer relying on that data blob.

Once you have that sort of strict data portability and interpretability codified into your tax code, tax filing software *should* become easy, because it's just shuttling data from one strict standard format into another strict standard format. This would be very easy for the financial institutions to do, because they already have the data. It's hell on earth for TurboTax to "Intuit" from human-readable PDF files. (See what I did there?)

Comment Re:It's cricially important to me because (Score 1) 146

I think you're understating the odds a bit. The average person meets 80,000 people in a lifetime. If your numbers are correct and trans women are 0.35% of the population, then on average you will meet 280 in your lifetime, which is a far cry from it being easy to go your whole life without meeting one.

This ignores social aspects, where in some parts of the world, you may go your whole life without being aware that you've met one because they all go out of their way to hide it, or where in some places you might not meet one because they've all left because of persecution, but that's a rather different statement.

Slashdot Top Deals

"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll

Working...