I worked as a programmer at a medical billing company back in 2009, and let me tell you it was eye opening. We had radiologists working remotely (in 2009!) with mutliscreen setups that would show an original image on the left of one screen, a computer-enhanced version on the other side of the screen, with a computer generated opinion pre-generated at the bottom of the image (again: 2009 already had this). The other screen, usually rotated 90 degrees, would show minimal required relevant patient history/demographic on the top and offer a place to enter the radiologists opinion below, along with a button to copy over the computer-generated opinion.
Let's game out their options.
Let's say the agree with the computer, and they're right. No extra reward, they're just doing their job.
Let's say they agree with the computer, and they're wrong. Well, that must have been a hard case. Oh well.
Let's say they disagree with the computer, and they're right. Again, just doing their job./
But now if they disagree with the computer, and they're wrong, that is a world of malpractice lawsuit about to drop on their heads.
That is, every incentive this person has is to just always agree with the computer. There is no great bonus for doing better, and potentially huge consequences when they disagree. (And, by the way, this is now the training data for more recent AI options).
And it's this context we had at least one doctor billing $300,000.
Per month.
So, in this case at least, yes please bring on the AI. Because it's already doing it, and I'm sure the AI won't have to cost as much.