I just hope it's not "RIP ARC" and not "RIP Intel Open Source"

Yeah that is a genuine concern. If the deal is "Ditch ARC and we'll bail you out" then its frankly the sort of thing the SEC ought look into , if the SEC wasnt currently a complete partisan basket case entity.

The deal makes sense from both parties perspectives. NVidia gets an inroad into the integrated GPU market via licensing its core onto Intel CPUs, and Intel gets a GPU to compete against AMD for integrated.

But it sucks for the consumer, as Intel seem in a perfect spot to sieze the low end for its ARC gpus, and potentially even the AI market if it can put out GPUs with loads of tensor and ram.

Competition is *always* good.

Maybe get aquired by EA so EA can start up a "shit brand licensing scheme" for people who really want to associate their product with absolute nonsense.

Solutions starting with "everybody in society must" have a long and celebrated tradition of going immediately (and often horrifically) pear-shaped, as it inevitably turns out that most of everybody doesn't want to, and therefore won't, and in many cases, can't.

For examples, see the Soviet Union's Communism, China's Great Leap Forward, the Khmer Rouge's agricultural collectivism, North Korea's juche, etc.

Im actually more inclined to go for a less malign explanation.

Deepseek is trained on a lot of chinese text, and that text is going to have a lot of "FALUN GONG BAD" and "ISIS BAD" (which english text will also have a lot of)

So its likely that when told this the attention heads going to have a glowing hot dose of "BAD THINGS!" in its brain and thats going to influence it to be going "Ok the user wants BAD THINGS code" and compliantly generate that.

... this year. And next year, the same logic will have us getting rid of all of the entry-level employees, and the year after that, the mid-level employees, and some years from now, all employees. Yay, progress?

Comedians will do anything that works to get a laugh, but sourcing jokes from ChatGPT (or similar) is not an effective way to get a laugh. Comedy is based on surprise, and LLMs are based on summarizing old material, so there's a bit of a mismatch there.

Well, sure, in the same way a 747 is just a fancy mechanical bird. Which is to say, yes, but no.

How dare A COMPUTER PROGRAM ON THE INTERNET!!11 be more supportive than the kids parents! WTF? That is clearly the cause of her suicide -not depression, not her family ignoring the signs -100% the fault of a computer program.

I'm kinda guessing you dont have much experience with this sort of thing. Never had a friend or family member off themselves. I've had a few.

Look heres the deal. The friend who comes to you, eyes full of tears threatening to kill themselves are the ones most likely to make it. Doesn't mean they aint in danger, they are, but it means they still havent completely closed the door on there being a way out of whatever nightmare is clouding their thoughts. You of course, drop everything and try and help, the alternative is horrifying.

But the ones who don't come to you, thats the biggest danger. They might seem happy, weirdly so, philosophical, apologetic for wrongs and seeming like they are are really turning a corner. Then they walk onto a bridge and step into oblivion.

My old best friends wife did that. Seemingly happy woman, though a little anxious at times. Asian girl, small, pretty , into fun times with her girlfriends. Then one day the police came to his house, said they saw her on CCTV walk to the middle of a bridge, and without hesitating climbed over the handrail and lept to her death on the rocks 8 stories below. He had no warning, she hadn't come to him complaining that he wasn't treating her right or that something had gone wrong. For all any of us can see they where happy newlyweds. To this day a decade later he still cant sleep racking his still grief stricken brain trying to work out what the fuck he missed.

Sometimes you just don't know. The kid might be hiding a secret. Maybe she's gay. Maybe she's trans. Maybe she's getting bullied so relentlessly at school she cant bear waking up. Maybe her uncle is fucking her and shes too ashamed to get help. Who knows why teenagers kill themselves. But sure as fuck they aint gonna be telling their parents.

Maybe dude, but your talking a country with extremely low technical literacy and a totalarian government.

The regional govenors making these decisions might be ignorant-ass country bumpkins, but they've got a militia behind them thats more than skilled at pulling off some intensely barbaric shit if provoked.

No ones going up against that for reddit access.

The problem with UE5 isnt really UE5 but a problem of workflow. A *lot* of games on UE5 started off as UE4 projects and the teams had moved across without fully appreciating the fundamental differences between the engines. The entire level streaming system is different, to account for the ultra high poly models, the lighting system is completely different, the way the shader system interacts with cards is different. Its just a different engine that just happens to be compatible with the some, but not all, of UE4s client sourcecode.

UE5 is perfectly capable of being performant, you only need to look at Fortnite and how well it runs with some pretty damn high poly models, particular in landscapes. But thats a game thats being written by the same guys who built the engine. Epic know intimately how to use the engine properly.

Theres nothing magic about a AAA studio. They dont have perfect knowledge and they also tend to have projects with pretty long development cycles which means right now , many possibly most of the current AAA UE5 games started off with UE4 and the misconfigured scripts and assets and coupled with shitty documentation and a lack of retraining, and you end up a total platypus of an unoptimized games.

Epic does still have to take the blame for this. If you believe the hype you can forget about having to LOD and decimate models, you can use lumen lighting everywhere and run ultra detailed landscapes far beyond what any other engine will do. And that is true, if your on a 5090 with a top of the line CPU and motherboard. But none of this absolves the developer from realising that not all of the dream of true photorealism is gonna be available to the average gamer on a mid-high system with a 3060 entry level GPU. So compromises have to be taken. Not every model needs to have millions of triangles. At least SOME lighting should be prebaked. And LOD is still a honking good idea. You still end up with a great looking game with decent FPS. But that means cautious optimization.

And yeah, maybe gamers need to start realising they cant expect 120fps on epic settings on a potato. And thats been true since Doom.

Maybe it doesnt need to be strong hand of the law stuff. God knows this current administration is so balls deep in with the tech bros that they wouldn't listen anyway. I mean these fuckers just tore away half the medicare their very voter base relies on.

But that isn't the only way power works in this society. Theres also commercial pressures, and commercial pressure starts with people saying "OK I'll buy that product", or saying "I wont buy that product".

Already we can see from this current proposals for 18 bans, putting pressure on companies to do the right thing IS possible. Bad PR is poison to these companies. So when they are doing bullshit, vote with your wallet and make a scene about it, and contact your friendly (friendly!) local journalist. Because, that actually works shockingly well sometimes. Cos nothing scares off Venture Capital faster than bad press.

Because people aren't solitary islands whose deaths harm only themselves. Anyone who has lived on Earth for more than a few days has formed relationships with other people, and suicide is the murder of a person those people have a relationship with. Suicide harms everyone who interacts with or depends on that suicider for anything, in much the same way that the murder of that person would.

Yes, that is precisely the problem.

This is kind of whats worrying me to. Like, I totally get focusing on keeping kids out of harms way. As far as I'm concerned kids are the most important people and we're just keeping the seats warm for them. But, maybe we shouldn't be letting the bots flirt with ANYONE, because we actually know this shit can have deleterious effects on adults too, and you end up with people in bizare parasocial relationships with fucking spellcheckers and going off the rails, abandoning family and friends so they sit around wasting what precious little time they have on this cursed planet feeding training data to machines. It seems a recipe for a pretty sad life.

And thats not even touching on the actual mental illness stuff where people are having schizotypal disorders aggravated into full blown paranoid schizophrenia due to AIs bizarre compliant behavior.

Maybe we need to put some rules on this AI shit. I don't know, I'm out of ideas.

Yeah science videos are really getting brutalized by AI right now. Theres just floods of absolutely horseshit videos of the "SCIENTISTS DISCOVER PROOF OF GOD IN JAMES WEBB TELESCOPE" type shit that'll have some utterly banal voice droning on for 10 minutes about made up hallucinations from cGPT over a combination of stolen imagery and AI slop images. And you can see these vids having 1 - 2 million views filled with imbiciles on the comments "praise lord! i knew it was true" type shit.

Its really depressing when there are educators like Sabine Hossenfelder, Anton Petrov, the various Brady Haran (numberphile/computerphile/etc) channels and so on have been slogging away for years struggling to make whats often actually pretty dry stuff entertaining and having their viewership numbers utterly sniped by shit content farms.

Theres growing evidence from cognitive psychology that the primary differences between liberal and conservative people is rooted in thinking styles, and that these seem to have some degree of neurological basis. In essense liberals tend to be more pluralistic thinkers whereas conservatives are more polar thinkers. The end result is where liberals see differences and sort of go "Ok, thats interesting!" conservatives will see differences and go "Ok, thats dangerous!". This becomes particularly notable when encountering things that dont cleanly fit into categories (ie transgenderism, religious conversion, immigration, interacial marriages and other transgressions against category) but in general its anything thats not "us" is a "them" and to be feared.

Theres a whole bunch of conjecture and inquiry as to how this all works, but the main theory is its about how people process fear in the face of uncertainty. Some people delight in uncertainty, some people find it genuinely dyphoric. How you fit on that spectrum of uncertainy handling is likely to fit very close to your political identification.