Comment McRib (Score 1) 126
When you have a product made from leftover rejected parts the supply is guaranteed to be limited.
So you hype it as "for a limited time" and people go hog wild with FOMO.
coming soon: "The Neo is Back."
When you have a product made from leftover rejected parts the supply is guaranteed to be limited.
So you hype it as "for a limited time" and people go hog wild with FOMO.
coming soon: "The Neo is Back."
Yeah, "LLM's are gods" and "statistical ML networks are good at finding defective code patterns" are extremely different claims.
The people who are True Believers on both extremes look pretty silly.
I appreciate really good closed captioning while having no use for chatbots. Both ends get to call me a heretic!
Just watch the patches and CVE's trickling out.
It's not like OpenBSD is going to sit on a vulnerability for 90 days or whatever.
Issuing a patch doesn't give away the details about how it was found.
To be fair I just wasted a week tracking down a radio telemetry problem because of a forum post that many people said worked great but it definitely pulled a pin high that was supposed to be low, which shut off an antenna.
Only diving into the spec sheet and some sample embedded code convinced me that the forum post was exactly wrong and after making a simple change to do the opposite did all the telemetry devices mesh up and start reporting correctly.
So
A wrinkle is that everybody knows humans are flawed and too many people treaty the LLM as omniscient.
Why should anybody care if this drives electric bills up to $1000/mo for the typical household?
We have unlimited energy, no?
Dipshits aren't creating a global energy crisis right now.
The world economy isn't headed for a global depression.
Natgas should be burned for LLM hallucinations and cats driving motorcycles, not converted into fertilizer to stave off a massive African famine.
Western woke governments haven't spent the past fifty years blocking new energy generation at every opportunity.
Right?
Don't invite the guillotines, dudes.
Why not notify their electric company to cut their power to halt infringement?
Or their water company so the house is uninhabitable?
The Courts need to recognize that Internet has become a necessary utility and that the music companies need to deal with the individual directly through the Courts, not in a lazy clandestine way.
Grande seems based.
Count the number of emails between a company founder and Epstein before you install their code in your Browser or put your data on their platform.
I mean, spies were spying on you?
Not to mock the victims, but c'mon, Nancy, don't be naÃve.
Copilot becomes an evening contributor on a self-proclaimed "for entertainment purposes only" network, bringing "fair and balanced" news, opinions and information
"It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don't rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk."
..which doesn't support 486s, so the OP's statement that OS/2 still supports 486s is still not true.
Yeah, Via made a clone that was similar not-quite-i586 fairly recently too.
I have an old embedded box with one that has SATA 6Gbps ports on it that I thought I would use zeroing out old hard drives.
I tried Puppy, DSL, SystemRescueCD, and a bunch of others and none would finish boot. FreeDOS is fine.
It's either eWaste or I need to dig out an Infomagic CD from the attic to get Redhat 9 pr whatever. Probably need to look up when the jump from 3 to 6 happened in SATA land.
But Linus is correct that actual distros don't supoort it. There's one project for composing embedded images that I might try before it hits a shredder. Or NetBSD maybe.
"Entertainment purposes only" Note that they don't say *whose* entertainment.
"Support", not "in use". IBM sure as hell doesn't support OS/2 any more.
No, they only found the cow tools.
The Privacy Act of 1974 technically restricts what personally identifiable information (PII) a federal agency can collect and retain.
Is that just directly or does it include data that can be purchased through third-part brokers? 'Cause some agencies seem to be using the latter.
Aside from it just being a scientific research project, in practice even if they were produced in combination it's almost certain that they would be refined and purified for medicinal use.
But it would be much easier to not have to separate them and do one molecule per plant/field.
That aside your monoamine oxidase would prevent all but the psylocin from being orally active. Maaybe if the tobacco were very carefully dried and not fermented you could smoke it.
Now if they were to engineer in some harmaline/telepathine and put it into a tomato you could make some very special marinara sauce. The acids would act like a 'lemon-tec' and heating could perhaps be doing some decarboxalating. I have no idea if people experiment with mushrooms and ayahuasca simultaneously.
I can't wait for the Epstein Class to start raiding pasta shops to protect their black markets.
One of the most overlooked advantages to computers is... If they do foul up, there's no law against whacking them around a little. -- Joe Martin