Battlestar Galactica was a great example of a great 1st Episode.

When #6 showed up at the neutral station, and asked "Are you alive?".

Perfect Hook. Hot Chick, Menacing robots, existential crisis ....

They will fail to compile.

That's not what you want Lint to do. You don't want it to say "This is proven unsafe," but "This can't be proven safe".

If the code isn't clearly safe, then it should be rewritten so it is.

There is no Nobel Prize in computer science, but you would get a Turing Award, which would likely be renamed in your honor since you proved Turing wrong.

You can't pick and choose features if you're working on code you didn't write.

4/5ths comes from radioactive decay in the crust.

The other 1/5th comes from radioactive decay in the core and mantle.

Most heat is created in the crust because uranium, thorium, and potassium generate the most heat and all form oxides rather than dissolving in iron.

Goldschmidt classification

The watts don't matter much because there's a six-sextillion-tonne thermal buffer.

If the decay stopped tomorrow, it wouldn't matter for a million years.

It should be more accurately called a conspiracy hypothesis. At least until there's real evidence backing it.

How does being manipulated relate to that? Conventional wisdom is that the party ahead in the polls stands to lose the most (and gain the least) from a debate.

The framerate also seems choppy. This movie definitely didn't win because of the graphics.

Do you think Ne Zha 2 is going to win academy awards? Maybe best picture.

"In the aether I appear in fiery forms, And in the aer I sit in a silvery chariot; earth reigns in my black brood of puppies." -- Porphyry knows what's going on.

I wouldn't accept an entire rocket from Bezos or Musk.

If you can't treat other people well and can't allow free editorial expression you're just a scumbag.

Bringing up lobbyists is just a rhetorical technique here, it means nothing.

If you want to claim that milk is bad for the health, bring the evidence. Everything else is a distraction.

The CDC doesn't need profit. If you want to allege that they are doing something improprietous, it could be true but you need a thing called evidence.

"A chorus of natural beings who live ineradicably, as it were, behind all civilization and remain eternally the same, despite the changes of generations and of the history of nations." --Nietzsche. Ever do people make allegations without evidence.

It's not entirely clear what you were trying to say. For example, Nakamura beat an engine (a good engine) in 2008.

Smart people spend time correcting themselves, not other people. That is why they are smart. You are not.