Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - NYC Threatens To Sue Verizon Over FiOS Shortfalls (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes: New York City officials yesterday notified Verizon that the company is in default of an agreement to bring fiber connections to all households in the city and could file a lawsuit against the company. The road to a potential lawsuit has been a long one. In June 2015, New York released an audit that found Verizon failed to meet a commitment to extend FiOS to every household in the five boroughs by June 2014. City officials and Verizon have been trying to resolve the matter since then with no success, as Verizon says that it hasn't actually broken the agreement. The default letter (full text) sent yesterday by the city Department of Information Technology & Telecommunications (DoITT) says Verizon has failed to pass all residential buildings in the city with fiber. As of October 2015, there were at least 38,551 addresses where Verizon hadn't fulfilled installation service requests that were more than a year old, the letter said. "Moreover, Verizon improperly reduced, from $50 million to $15 million, the performance bond required [by] the Agreement on the basis of Verizon's incorrect representations that Verizon had met the prescribed deployment schedule, when in fact it had not," the letter said. City officials demanded that Verizon restore the bond and wants a response within 30 days. The default letter also accuses Verizon of failing to make records related to its provision of cable service available to the city during its audit. "Officials say they could sue Verizon unless the carrier shows clear plans for stepping up installations," and that the notice is the first step in that process, The Wall Street Journal reported. The citywide fiber agreement lets NYC seek monetary damages from Verizon if it fails to deliver on the fiber promises.

Comment Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... (Score 1) 456

You must be either

  1. Very young
  2. Happily married
  3. A feminist (always blaming men, "keep your pecker in your pocket"
  4. A religious nut or preacher
  5. Completely without a sex drive for some other reason (a freak of nature)

Did I miss any possibilities?

You obviously weren't an adult during the '70s when contraception was cheap and easy (there were IUDs back then, no need to have to remember to take a daily pill) and there were no uncurable STDs. That had never happened before in human history, and hasn't happened since. It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say "wanna fuck?" I kid you not. I always had to decline, as I was married (I no longer am, I hope they cure aids and bring back IUDs!).

You obviously do NOT read any history, either, and never heard of the "free love" movement in the 1920s.

To say that today's society is more hedonistic than any other time reeks of pure ignorance, which is why you WERE modded to oblivion; you're simply wrong, and insultingly and judgementally so. Speaking of which, if you're #4, leave a little extra in the collection plate and beg forgiveness; you know what Jesus said about being judgemental.

Government

How Should a Constitution Protect Digital Rights? 151

Bibek Paudel writes "Nepal's Constituent Assembly is drafting a new constitution for the country. We (FOSS Nepal) are interacting with various committees of the Assembly regarding the issues to be included in the new constitution. In particular, the 'Fundamental Rights Determination Committee' is seeking our suggestions in the form of a written document so that they can discuss it in their meeting next week. We have informed them, informally, of our concerns for addressing digital liberties and ensuring them as fundamental rights in the constitution. We'd also like to see the rights to privacy, anonymity, and access to public information regardless of the technology (platforms/software). Whether or not our suggestions will be incorporated depends on public hearings and voting in the assembly later, but the document we submit will be archived for use as reference material in the future when amendments in the constitution will be discussed or new laws will be prepared. How are online rights handled in your country? How would you want to change it?" Read on for more about Bibek's situation.

Slashdot Top Deals

Algol-60 surely must be regarded as the most important programming language yet developed. -- T. Cheatham

Working...