Those aren't communications. Communications protocols assume you have read up until the latest message.

As you're not currently in charge of any social media companies, we can just keep things how they are.

On a Mac? Apple Mail works great even with 365 email. Thunderbird is not bad and definitely functional, but it is still not a polished UI after all this time.

Because you've already read it. You might have even been the one to write it. New information goes at the very top. Reverse chronological makes perfect sense if you need to trace backward at a point of confusion because the most recent is the most relevant.

But I want to maintain friendships with people who would otherwise annoy me and at least keep up with the actual important stuff as verified algorithmically by other people interacting with it. And to be honest, most people would annoy me if I had to see the unedited feed.

Yikes, no. Some people just post too much. I'd rather just let an algorithm lower the priority on parts of the firehose a bit. Otherwise it would just be a feed of whoever talks the most.

What about it? The only thing that was ever in question was whether certain Americans were knowingly complicit. It definitely happened.

I didn't even realize the newer digital cinema cameras added microphones. But it makes sense even if the quality is terrible for the reason you said.

I didn't even realize the newer digital cinema cameras added microphones. But it makes sense even if the quality is terrible for the reason you said.

However, the time code data probably includes the shot and take numbers to link them together, though it might as well end up in the file names.

Although the film cameras and audio both have time codes captured now, they aren't a single file. Likely not even captured to the same storage. A lot of intake workflow that can probably be and already is automated in a traditional way, though.

The most boring part of filmmaking is matching up picture and audio from a dozen or more takes in line with the storyboard. I think it would be great to see AI take raw footage and build a skeleton project file with all of the different takes matched up with their respective audio and cut to fit the rough storyboard. Then you spend your time and resources on the actual creative parts. These are already the lowest paid people involved in a film anyway and they probably don't exactly enjoy the work.

The latency of the actual processing is way higher than the latency of network distance. Why are these being built where water isn't plentiful? They could literally build a combination hydro plant and data center in one and use the same water for cooling as they do for power generation. It's the way of the original industrial revolution to build along rivers.

There's literally a driver at the front of the bus right by the entrance. It would be just as easy to use this facial recognition to show a potential match to the driver on a screen along with a name so the driver can verify.

Even safer!

That they did, but SpaceX at least achieved some success compared to other commercial space attempts.