I do as far as you know.

They are a well known product compared to camera phones? GTFOH with that clown shit

It's a reasonable assumption given the things we know about Facebook

Will the old trick of outlining your license plate with a bunch of high power IR LEDs obscure your plate from the camera, while still allowing human eyes to read them....?

"Public companies are beholden to their stock price."

Wrong. They are beholden to their charter.

Do you know ANYTHING except how to get italics?

You barely need computers for nuclear weapons.

How much of Putin's cock do you suck?

No, since you don't care who knows you're ignorant and can't Internet.

If the concealed cameras you are talking about were sold at Costco then more people would be concerned.

Oh look it pretended disguised and non-disguised cameras are equivalent again

It's a DISGUISED camera. Your other examples aren't disguised. This is an obvious difference which you are pretending doesn't exist.

Pretending doesn't change reality.

You can't just pretend the malicious users don't exist. But that's exactly what Meta is doing.

Maybe we're just not ready to have certain things in our societies because there are too many shitlords.

That kind of thing is insane but nowhere near peak insane waste of money.

I used to do database reporting for a tribal casino. The biggest customer had dropped over $10M in there. There were more than ten others in the multi million dollar losers club.

More like 99.99%. Maybe need some more nines in there. Large C codebases without regular critical CVEs are basically nonexistent.

It's not the assorted employees' faults. It's Congress' fault since it's their job to solve it.