So in this instance, you failed, because no one knows who the shit Rebecca Watson is, nor do they give a shit about whoever the fuck Rebecca Watson is, thinks
It could be freakin great though, if they adopted a bit of the Amazon logistics soup recipe. They have shitloads of pickup locations scattered about already.
/p>
Have you seen the size of a Gamestop? They're tiny and cramped, and don't exactly scream "large amount of extra storage space"
Musk said he was a "fool"
No shit?
During cross-examination, Savitt clashed with Musk over questioning. Savitt asked whether Musk had contributed $38 million to OpenAI, rather than the $100 million that he later claimed to have invested on X. Musk said he also contributed his reputation to the company and came up with the idea for the name, leading Savitt to ask Musk to respond yes or no to "simple" questions. "Your questions are not simple. They're designed to trick me, essentially," Musk said, adding that he had to elaborate or it would mislead the jury.
"Ladies and gentleman of the jury, asking me whether a statement I made is true or not is a devious question designed to trick me! Did I mention that I'm a fool? You've gotta understand that being associated with a fool like me has a valuation of 60 - 70 million!"
That's a really keen observation. You really got his ass with that one.
- Kurt Werle, for some reason.
I chat anonymously with Gemini because it can hold a philosophical conversation with me better than most people I know.
You should probably keep stuff like that to yourself.
You have a philosophy of having only what you need on the OS
He didn't say that. Before you reply to people with such surly condescension, you need to make sure you actually understand what they said.
it's still a fundamentally bad human interface and remains a solution in search of a problem.
I don't think you know what that phrase mean.
The problem is "we don't have a means of immersing a person's entire field of view into a three-dimensional virtual world."
CNET's web sites (which include ZDNET, PCMag, Mashable and Lifehacker) are even hosting a contest "to see which of our readers can make the best Apple predictions for 2026. Answer five questions in any of our three rounds of the contest to be entered to win [$applePrize] in September. [...] This first round of contest questions will run from today, May 19."
That's amazing news, crack CNET team!!! I can't WAIT to win [$applePrize] with my prediction that Apple will finally release an iphone that you control with your ass. I already shoved three of them up my ass to start practicing!
Now all these obsolete devices have to be landfilled instead of being used in retro computing environments. Everything is being trashed due to AI. I've also heard of many indie websites shutting down due to only getting views from scrapers.
You don't know wtf you're talking about. Why would these devices be upgrading to this kernel? And in the situation that they NEEDED to upgrade to this kernel, why wouldn't they just...compile a version of this kernel with the device drivers added back in?
Again, you don't know wtf you're talking about.
That's the entire point of a new version.
When was the last time a vendor released a new version and they're marketing team was all "Hey fam, guess what? New version is out, and it sucks sweet ass!"
Why does the crack
And after you find them you have to fix them No they don't. They're sitting on some bugs that are approaching 26+ years old. And yet they don't fix them.
There's a difference between "a bug that is a security vulnerability" and "a bug that isn't a security vulnerability", so unless the 26+ year old belongs to the former, you don't have a point.
1 Word = 1 Millipicture
