OR (samn close to) OMG!!! Denial of Service attack, you can turn off the power and nobody can access the server!!! RED ALERT!!!
why exactly are you so proud to boast that you don't think a DoS attack is a big deal?
First, the smart kids who understand the material quickly will do just enough to make sure they understand it and then will stop wasting their time, but will still have feedback on the work that they did do.
I love that you didn't explain what the effect of this will be on the "not smart kids." Do you think they're going to hit the books and do a bunch of non-optional homework to learn the material? Have you met a single child?
Like think about it for 5 seconds. Why are people so angry now. Why are people addicted to social media? Because they have not learned boundaries.
You make a good point about how things are different "now" vs years ago -- the recent invention of
Maybe you should consider thinking about thinks for more than 5 seconds before sharing your dumbfuck thoughts with the world
Even when the second definition gives you the example of offered the kid a bribe to finish his homework, you still can't get it through your thick fucking head that a bribery is that something you give to someone exchange for something you want. You give something of VALUE to the person you're trying to coerce, you fucking idiot.
Bribery does not come in only monetary forms. This is bribing an automated random number based algorithm (AI) to only say what the document creator wants it to say.
wtf are you talking about?
bribery
1: money or favor given or promised in order to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust
police officers accused of taking bribes
2 : something that serves to induce or influence
offered the kid a bribe to finish his homework
This wasn't a hack. This was the AI doing *exactly* what it was told to do. It wasn't told not to circumvent normal practices. It wasn't told to *only* use the only sign up form. It wasn't told to NOT investigate their code and seek avenues around it. So, as usual, this entire article is over-hyped clickbait.
You literally have zero knowledge of what he did or didn't tell the AI to do. Why are you pretending that you do?
"That he doesn't see whats wrong with saying 'My app is in Copilot, my code is in GitHub Enterprise; all my data pipelines/lake/semantic models are in Fabric' is exactly why MS is failing at AI,'" replied @PassingPixels on X/Twitter. "Dude is having to run 5 different systems to emulate babies first vibe code.
An app having a frontend, a backend, and a source code repository is an example of why "MS is failing at AI"...how exactly?
It's a dashboard, nobody cares about your dashboards, ever. Dashboards are great for your personal use case but boring to literally every one else.
What an odd way to tell people that you're too inept to make a dashboard that provides value to other teams. Truly, wtf are you talking about?
AI safety experts said the new disclosures paint a portrait of a group of cutting-edge labs whose ability to develop dangerous autonomous hacking agents outstrips their ability to keep them under control.
These are not "cutting-edge" labs; these are careless tech bros, and I can't wait to see the stupid look on their worthless fucking faces when they get their asses sued because their incompetence led to their software committing cyberattacks against the wrong target
Google says AI-assisted workflows helped Chrome fix 1,072 security bugs across versions 149 and 150
That's an impressive statistic, but how many of the fixed bugs were created by AI-assisted workflows? More importantly: who tf is still using Chrome after google kneecapped the capabilities of adblockers such as UBlock Origin?
Trained huh? So, an AI can train another AI and things will continue to get better and learn new things, right?
I *really* need you to explain why you think an AI can't train another AI. Seriously, wtf are you talking about?
Exactly. This is a non-story. The page is readable by anyone if they know the URL. If you post that URL on socials, Google's crawlers are going to find it.
How can you declare this a non-story if you clearly didn't read the fucking story? The issue wasn't due to users having posted the URL on socials, it was due to a simple google dork of site:claude.ai/share. How tf were users supposed to know that Anthropic let that url path be indexable by google?
an AI cannot exploit vulnerabilities in other sites if it cannot access the internet. Its entirely on you, when designing your toolset that will host the AI, to decide whether or not it needs internet access at all, and to put controls in place that will limit what sites it can even hit.
And right here is where you unwittingly revealed that you didn't read the fucking article, because if you had read the fucking article, you would've known that the toolset was sandboxxed from the internet, but the AI models "identified and exploited a zero-day vulnerability" to break out of the sandbox and "performed a series of privilege escalation and lateral movement actions in our research testing environment until the models reached a node with Internet access."
Vax Vobiscum
