Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:No doubt they want you to stay on them for life (Score 1) 162

"The drug suppresses your apatite."

It does not. That is not how the drug works but is, instead, a common side effect.

Can always count on you to lecture about things you do not know.

You really wrote "The drug does not suppress your appetite; suppressing your appetite is one of the things the drug commonly does" and said to yourself "fuck yeah, I got his ass!"?

Comment Re: Hand out (Score 1) 306

Why are you still babbling that anyone is suggesting that you pay cash or that not paying your cards on time is giving you fraud protection?

People are suggesting a simple, two step process:

Step 1) Use credit card.
Step 2) Pay credit card statement on time.

Where do you see cash being used?
Where do you see a lack of "fraud protection"?

Comment Re: Hand out (Score 1) 306

What kind of dumb fuck spends real money if they don't have to?

YOU. YOU'RE the dumb fuck spending $500 in interest when you don't have to.

Why in the fuck would you pull out $16k in cash, when you can pay a $500 service fee to have complete fraud protection?

No one said anything about pulling out $16K in cash, you fucking nitwit. By all means, put a trip on a credit card when you can afford to, which means when you can afford to pay the full balance of the statement during the billing period the expenses occurred on.

"I'm not burning $500 on interest, it's a service fee for fraud protection!" lol, holy shit -- this HAS to be a bit. No one's that fucking dumb

Comment Re:Hand out (Score 1) 306

"poor planning" doesn't equal "liquidity."

You really shouldn't use words that you don't understand the definition of. Just because you get away with it when babbling to whatever dumbfucks are unlucky enough to know you in real life, that shit doesn't fly here.

What's truly incredible is that if you weren't so half-assedly burning money, you'd actually be able to afford to go on a $16K trip without having to finance it at absurd interest rates, lol

Comment Re:Hand out (Score 1) 306

This isn't a logical argument, it's a value judgement.
The fact that you're too dim-witted to tell those apart isn't surprising.

You can call it whatever you want, princess, the point still stands: if "not needlessly wasting resources" isn't one of your "values", your professional life must be conducted in similar manner as your personal life -- half-assed.

I'm sorry you're poor. Do night classes. Degrees still have value. You don't need to flip burgers forever. I believe in you.

How do you not understand that in order to insult a person for being poor, they actually have to be poor for the insult to work? Like, you really seem to think you popped off some zinger there, but you're just further exposing yourself as not being just dumb, but being dumb dumb, but now with an added bonus of some weird contempt for the poor, lol

Comment Re:Hand out (Score 1) 306

$16k isn't a huge amount compared to a semi-high-end IT salary.

Man, do we even wanna know how half-assed you are at IT if you think "putting my $16k vacation on plastic and paying for it over a few months" is good, logical, decision-making? it's incredible how proud you are of such wasteful idiocy, lol

Comment Well-funded American Universities succeed AGAIN (Score 3, Funny) 37

What a great story! Do you see what gets accomplished when American Universities are well-funded?!

Sorry, I'm being told and that this breakthrough happened in China and that the current administration completely slashed funding to our universities? That can't be right, that would've set back American research by decades and ceding the advantage to China. I'm gonna have to look into this deeper.

Comment Re:Non-smart 50" TV's don't "cost less than $200" (Score 1) 109

For everyone in the manufacturing chain, there's a difference: - cost: what they pay to design and build, or procure a widget - price: what they'll sell that widget for. The difference between the two is their margin, ie the profit they made on the sale.

Did that help clear things up, or should I include some insults for you?

You'd have a point if my post was referring to anyone in the manufacturing chain, but it wasn't; it was referring to the consumers purchasing the TV at a store -- you know, the topic that the entire article is about? How much it costs you the consumer to purchase a television.

You'd get a C- for effort, but we gotta bump you down to a D+ cause you got snarky thinking really did something there, when all you did was show that you context cues are not your friend.

Comment Re:Non-smart 50" TV's don't "cost less than $200" (Score 1) 109

" increases the price"

Costs are not prices.

cost: the price paid to acquire, produce, accomplish, or maintain anything.

Guy 1: Hey man, I just bought a new 50" TV!

Guy 2: Nice! How much did it cost?

Guy 1: 400 bucks!

Guy 2: Oh wow. It only cost 400 bucks? What was the price?

Guy 1: Do you not know what words mean? I just fucking told you, 400 bucks.

Did that help clear things up, or are you so far on the spectrum that your socially inept brain needs it explained with sockpuppets?

Slashdot Top Deals

Them as has, gets.

Working...