"Sounds like a dumb IT manager who is both begging for more money, and desperately trying to cover his own ass. Anyone with half a brain could see this coming a mile off.
demonstrates that you're a condescending prick that doesn't know wtf he's talking about
"the general fact that people are energized by working with people"
"fact"? lol. lmao. this fucking fuck fucking sucks!
There are a hundred places on the internet where you can find out how to make a Molotov cocktail. It isn't terribly hard.
You completely missed the point; it doesn't matter that the instructions for making a Molotov cocktail are available elsewhere. The article explains:
While NeuralTrust was developing its jailbreak designed to obtain instructions, and succeeding, on how to create a Molotov cocktail (a common test to prove a jailbreak)
I.e: The point was to demonstrate that the guardrails can be bypassed, which means that those same guardrails that are supposed to prevent the LLM from generating information that's more harmful than a Molotov cocktail, e.g. CSAM, could also be bypassed.
You might as well be arguing that an EICAR test file isn't a real virus, so it doesn't matter if a virus scanner failed to detect it
First, it does not reliably work.
That sounds like a skill issue, and you a sign that you shouldn't be giving people security advice
Instead, I tell people to select the Text or Phone option.
You tell people to use the methodology that can be attacked?
Yeah, you DEFINITELY shouldn't be giving people security advice.
Trump is clearly trying to end the war in Ukraine.
"Trump is clearly trying to let Russia win their war against Ukraine" is really valuable insight. Thank you.
At this point it really does not matter the origin of COVID does it? What would it change?
What kind of question is this? If we want to prevent a similar outbreak from happening, of course we would want to know the origin of Covid.
What would it change?
If we understood the origin of Covid and whether it was preventable, you don't know what would change? The steps that could be taken to prevent this from happening again is what would change. Again, what kind of question IS this?
Such snafus have not dented Excel's dominance. Might artificial intelligence (AI) steal its crown? With whizzy new tools powered by the technology promising to make data analysis easier, the familiar grid of numbers and calculations could soon feel outdated.
You literally can't trust the output of "A.I." to be correct. Ever
I'm unclear on why it needs to go 13,000 feet down. You would think a couple of thousand feet would be good enough to get you some boiling water.
Heat rises and due to the square-inverse function, they lose a LOT of it if they don't drill deep enough. A little back of the napkin math shows that their break-even point is somewhere between 4000 - 6000 feet. But once they get past 6K, they can start drilling WIDER (picture a reverse funnel) which mostly undoes the loss. They could probably stop at 10K, but I can see why they'd want an additional 3000ft as a "buffer"
I took a look at that article. The article pointed out the stupidity, the cost, the lack of accessibility, etc. But it didn't say that the cars actually failed at the self-driving, which is what you seem to be implying.
The fact that the cars all have paid drivers in them, instead of being self-driving, wasn't a tip-off to you that they failed at being able to self-drive?
Normal people figured out long ago that Elon Musk isn't a real-life Tony Stark, he's a real-life Lyle Lanley
Any article title that starts with the words "Elon Musk" should only contain variations of the words "worthless" and "fraud"
I am not an Economist. I am an honest man! -- Paul McCracken