Comment Re: wtf is JPEG-XL (Score 1) 48
oof, you really think you wrote quite the zinger there, eh?
Comment Re:Good luck with that. (Score 0) 69
Then they figured out that every 4 self-check registers requires 1 human employee to watch it and handle all the alerts it pops up. Pretty sure that one human employee could scan groceries 4 times faster than people doing it themselves, so those self-check registers are saving them... absolutely nothing.
You just explained how they were able to eliminate 3 positions, i.e., they eliminated the cost of 3 salaries + benefits, but your awesome understanding of math deduced that they saved nothing? wtf is wrong with you
Comment Re:wtf is JPEG-XL (Score -1, Troll) 48
Imagine a world where you 1) didn't have to suss out (and fail) what a post is about because the editor did their job, and 2) didn't find it SO controversial that someone suggested that the post could've used like two extra sentences of explanation
Comment Re:it's all about sex (Score 1) 169
in other news, just checked and yandex is working fine for me
Why are you under the impression that the story is that the yandex search engine was down completely?
Comment Re:Good for the US as well... (Score 1, Flamebait) 169
I bet you consider yourself a really deep thinker
Comment Please share what you're smoking (Score 4, Interesting) 58
I expect Mark is right there is no need to stop, just a need to do it right, which Meta/facebook can
Ah yes, if there's one thing Mark and Meta/facebook are known for, it's "doing things right" -- they're TOTALLY not known for massive privacy and data security failures.
Truly, wtf are you talking about and why are you subjecting the rest of us to it?
Comment Re: wtf is JPEG-XL (Score -1, Flamebait) 48
Thanks for sharing that you don't understand what an editor's job is, or what the purpose of an article summary is.
Comment wtf is JPEG-XL (Score -1, Flamebait) 48
"Oh look, a submission about Firefox supporting JPEG-XL. Before I post it, should I, /.'s top editor, edit the summary and explain wtf JPEG-XL is along with why anyone should give a shit about it? Nah."
-- BeauHD, Editor-in-Queef
Comment Re:AI Argression is Not A Vulnerability (Score 1) 14
AI is doing exactly what it was designed to do: gather money and information at any cost.
that's cool, but wtf does that have to do with this post? did you just read the word "AI" and jump to the comments to share your deep wisdom?
Comment Re:Adversarial patterns FTW! (Score 1) 100
Sick burn, bro
Comment Re:Adversarial patterns FTW! (Score 1) 100
The more you type, the dumber everyone else gets.
Comment Re:Adversarial patterns FTW! (Score 2, Funny) 100
I'm not suggesting that as a way to specifically avoid detection; rather, as a way to poison the data with 99% irrelevant matches.
Your plan to "absolutely wallpaper the front and back of our cars with bumper stickers that look like faces and license plates" just makes your car even more uniquely identifiable. You're a complete fucking idiot.
Comment Re:Misanthropomorphizing (Score 1) 121
You realize it's just predicting tokens, right? It doesn't "feel" anything.
You realize that it's possible that people aren't being literal in their use of the word "feel", right? It's not complicated.
But thanks for letting us know it's just predicting tokens -- that's very insightful. Anytime anyone talks about an LLM performing an action, I'll be sure to share the deep insight that the technology that performs actions by predicting tokens did so by predicting tokens.
Comment Re:Worth keeping in mind (Score 1) 38
OR (samn close to) OMG!!! Denial of Service attack, you can turn off the power and nobody can access the server!!! RED ALERT!!!
why exactly are you so proud to boast that you don't think a DoS attack is a big deal?
Comment Re: Not only that but very very very soon we're al (Score 1) 64
Why he should *he* leave? You're the one who sucks
