Literally, the first fucking sentence of the summary says that "Snover's retirement comes after a brief sojourn at Google as a Distinguished Engineer, following a lengthy stint at Microsoft", specifically, the fucking article says "In 2022, Snover left Microsoft spent a few years at Google."

You really wrote "The drug does not suppress your appetite; suppressing your appetite is one of the things the drug commonly does" and said to yourself "fuck yeah, I got his ass!"?

Why are you still babbling that anyone is suggesting that you pay cash or that not paying your cards on time is giving you fraud protection?

People are suggesting a simple, two step process:

Step 1) Use credit card.
Step 2) Pay credit card statement on time.

Where do you see cash being used?
Where do you see a lack of "fraud protection"?

YOU. YOU'RE the dumb fuck spending $500 in interest when you don't have to.

No one said anything about pulling out $16K in cash, you fucking nitwit. By all means, put a trip on a credit card when you can afford to, which means when you can afford to pay the full balance of the statement during the billing period the expenses occurred on.

"I'm not burning $500 on interest, it's a service fee for fraud protection!" lol, holy shit -- this HAS to be a bit. No one's that fucking dumb

"poor planning" doesn't equal "liquidity."

You really shouldn't use words that you don't understand the definition of. Just because you get away with it when babbling to whatever dumbfucks are unlucky enough to know you in real life, that shit doesn't fly here.

What's truly incredible is that if you weren't so half-assedly burning money, you'd actually be able to afford to go on a $16K trip without having to finance it at absurd interest rates, lol

You can call it whatever you want, princess, the point still stands: if "not needlessly wasting resources" isn't one of your "values", your professional life must be conducted in similar manner as your personal life -- half-assed.

How do you not understand that in order to insult a person for being poor, they actually have to be poor for the insult to work? Like, you really seem to think you popped off some zinger there, but you're just further exposing yourself as not being just dumb, but being dumb dumb, but now with an added bonus of some weird contempt for the poor, lol

All those words from such a fussy little man, and yet none of them answer the simple question of how you're gonna get fucked by interest rates being capped at 10%. You'd think a guy who's this worked up over it wouldn't find it so difficult to explain wtf he's talking about, and yet here we are, lol

Holy melodrama, Batman! -- How on earth is this proposal going to fuck you?

oh my heavens! attempted price control? Can you pick up a fainting couch on one of your cards so we can all take turns giving a shit?

Man, do we even wanna know how half-assed you are at IT if you think "putting my $16k vacation on plastic and paying for it over a few months" is good, logical, decision-making? it's incredible how proud you are of such wasteful idiocy, lol

Oh yes, because your first reply was just a Master's thesis length rebuttal of "well argued facts." lmao.

The size of the facility has fuckall to do with the findings or relevancy of this specific experiment.

The age of the design has fuckall to do with the findings or relevancy of this specific experiment.

Like I said, you don't know what you're talking about.

This was not a "small lab environment." You don't know what you're talking about.

What a great story! Do you see what gets accomplished when American Universities are well-funded?!

Sorry, I'm being told and that this breakthrough happened in China and that the current administration completely slashed funding to our universities? That can't be right, that would've set back American research by decades and ceding the advantage to China. I'm gonna have to look into this deeper.

You'd have a point if my post was referring to anyone in the manufacturing chain, but it wasn't; it was referring to the consumers purchasing the TV at a store -- you know, the topic that the entire article is about? How much it costs you the consumer to purchase a television.

You'd get a C- for effort, but we gotta bump you down to a D+ cause you got snarky thinking really did something there, when all you did was show that you context cues are not your friend.