There's a difference between "a bug that is a security vulnerability" and "a bug that isn't a security vulnerability", so unless the 26+ year old belongs to the former, you don't have a point.

The summary says that Fog Data is providing the police with historical location data that was collected from apps such as Google Maps, and your genius solution is "I'll simply put my phone in a faraday bag. Surely, my map app will still work like that!"

Did you seriously just share with the world "Feminism made me unfuckable"...without being prompted to do so?

Wait, if negotiating a treaty with Iran is a bad idea that will surely go wrong, then why is Trump trying to negotiate a treaty with Iran?

How would that accomplish anything since the FBI would've already told Clod "don't let us be hacked"??

I am shocked -- SHOCKED -- to hear that a company has announced that the latest version of their product is better than the last version. Usually when company's release new versions, they're all "Hey guys, we're excited to announce that Gooch 2.8 just released. Unfortunately, it's slower than Gooch 2.7, we removed half the features, and the other half simply don't work anymore."

Kudos to the ./ editorial team for bringing us this breaking news.

What's pretty cool about reading is that you don't have to presume anything. Like, imagine a world where you could've been assed to read just up to the second sentence of the summary where you would've learned "Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin ""announced this week that it had developed a reactor that could successfully release oxygen from lunar soil by using an electric current."

You could've spared us from you proudly proclaiming how lazy you are

...with completely made up directions along with an incorrect walk time?"

I'm not an expert, but I'm pretty sure one of the things blind people appreciate about seeing-eye dogs is that a dog isn't going to hallucinate whether it's safe or not to walk across the street, and they don't have to worry about getting run over by a truck, exclaim "What the fuck!", and have to listen to a dog reply "It appears that you had a 'Don't Walk' sign, and you're right for calling me out on that..."

Thanks for explaining that the thing I said wasn't a loophole wasn't a loophole.

SSD prices have gone up due to demand for SSDs from the AI industry; the demand for them has nothing to do with the shortage in RAM. Who the fuck writes this bullshit and thinks "yeah, that makes sense"? And then who edits it and says "yeah, that makes sense"? And what exactly do /. editors get paid for to read this and go "yeah, that makes sense" before posting it?

Words have meaning: a loophole in a law is when the intent of the law can be evaded due to things such as ambiguity or an omission within its text.
...this article is just about a law that expired and didn't get extended. How has /. not replaced their crack editorial team with an LLM yet?

Just to be clear, you:
1) Think RMS didn't understand that an adult having sex with a child causes harm to the child was due to a "lack of social skills"?
2) Take issue with RMS being "cancelled" for having said shit like "child pornography" might be [...] an image of a sexually mature teenager that any normal adult would find attractive. What's heinous about having such a photo?

Good job on broadcasting that you've got some fucked up shit on your hard drive, champ

wtf are you talking about?

Wait, you're upset that they weren't super-supportive of RMS, as in this RMS: "Many years ago I posted that I could not see anything wrong about sex between an adult and a child, if the child accepted it. Through personal conversations in recent years, I've learned to understand how sex with a child can harm per psychologically. This changed my mind about the matter: I think adults should not do that." ?

Cool hero, bro

Ah yes, you're right -- people are having less children because of that new invention: porn.