Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:To be clear (Score 1) 296

If Ukraine goes north into Russia towards Moscow, I agree with you, Russia is likely to use a nuke. That will be an existential threat, which is the bar Russia has set for using nukes.

On the other hand, if Ukraine manages to take Crimea, will Russia use a nuke? It's not an existential threat, it's just a vacation spot. They might use it, but it's hard to know.

Comment Re:Modified capitalism (Score 1) 199

The big critique about capitalism is wealth inequality - it invariably leads to some people getting most of the money, and everyone else getting very little money.

It's not really about inequality. It's about a system where man abuses man. If we had a system where man does not abuse man, then the communist ideal has been achieved even if the state doesn't entirely own the means of production.

Comment Re:To be clear (Score 1) 296

We had air superiority in Afghanistan for 20 years. And Vietnam before that.

AND Iraq. None of those were military losses. The military did its job, what it was asked to do. The military is a tool, and America's is a sharp one.

Moreover, your explosions are not all powerful. Some things will be underground.

Yeah, it might take some boots on the ground. Some operations require that. But soldiers are part of the military. Look at the casualty numbers in this engagement to get an idea of what air superiority does for a military: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Comment Re:False optimism - no permanent tech advantages (Score 1) 296

All that has to happen is for Europe and America to get together and say, "It has been decided that Russia will not be allowed to annex any part of Ukraine." Putin is not insane, he'll fight Ukraine but not NATO if NATO gets serious. But he hasn't crossed any red lines.

That's not what happened, though. Biden told Putin, "If you invade Ukraine, we will sanction you." Putin said, "Good deal."

Slashdot Top Deals

Going the speed of light is bad for your age.

Working...