It could be upper-lower class.

A cynic might suggest that the threshold was chosen in part to make the numbers work out for a pre-determined conclusion.

It could easily be converted to generate frustrated messages, and that would be useful.

It would very convenient as a macro binding in development environments. A real time saver.

If by "punish", you mean "stop subsidizing" then yes; I suppose so.

Kneel before your Masters, pleb.

There doesn't seem to be much to this story. As far as I can tell, they haven't done any scientific or even casual tests to clone open source or closed source. It's vapor ware.

Then why is the Kim family still in power in North Korea?

The types of neural networks used in these classifiers are not LLMs. The expense and difficulty of collecting an image set is going to far outweigh the compute time used to train them.

We are questioning whether the AI is creating something new, or whether it's just copying the original.

It's a question because the AI was trained on the original. Clean Room Design is a well-known engineering technique. It's not a problem when cloning closed source if the AI wasn't trained on that closed source code.

It's relatively easy to setup VPN over SSH, that might work if you need it at some time in the future.

OK, so your viewpoint is a little more clear now. You don't have a problem creating and killing animal life.

What about stem cell embryo research? Or sperm research? Does that bother you?

Sounds like you are having trouble with neomodern life and post-morality.

Just remember that human life is fungible dogshit and that we need to serve our Masters!

You'll be ok.

That's what you do every time you eat. Are you monstrous?

Only Jainism opposes it.

The issue is now settled.

The users will not be compensated.

Any more silly questions?

"I don't recall saying I'm sorry."