Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: The climate is going extreme (Score 1) 58

Firstly it's very funny that you acknowledge the thing I said is real, then you declare "except when I do it" and then you do the exact thing I described and act smug like you're being clever. Well potato brains, you're not, you're just another old man yelling at the kids on his lawn about how their music sucks.

Second for you to take any creed in what that guy is describing and then support the social-media-Presidency and the destruction of education institutions is also very fucking on point for you.

But what am I saying, you don't believe any this, it's all a bit.

Comment Re: The climate is going extreme (Score 1) 58

I could take what you wrote and apply it to the Baby Boomers just as easily with their lack of empathy and their parents and grandparents thought the same of them.

Or Gen X who went "MeMeMe" this past election.

Every older generation thinks the newer ones suck, this isn't new or really grounded in reality.

Also I've seen plenty of parents or people who have had kids that lack empathy and sympathy just as much. It's not a miracle "become a good person pill". I mean how many deadbeat or piece of shit parents exist out there?

Comment Re:We already know ice is there... [Re:Finally!] (Score 1) 91

Right. Those are some of the hot topics in lunar science. So if someone lands a couple of rovers there with a bunch of cameras, penetrating radar, spectrometers, etc. finds water, and analyzes it, they'll be at the forefront of lunar science.

Define forefront. I define it as the leading or most important position or place.

Can you tell me the other lunar science that exists? Or what science that is going to be eliminated as the leading edge?

Or is this just pop culture or nationalistic outlook, and not actually science based?

How about a challenge - since there is a present forefront of lunar science, what is it? One does not announce a new king without knowing the old king is dead. As Geoffrey.landis notes, we already know that there is water on the moon, and have known for quite a while. The prospects of an exploitable amount of it at the polar south pole is intriguing. How much and how any water is presented - my money is on water mixed within regolith. But there are other possibilities.

One of the strangest is the possibility of underground lakes of liquid water. Now there's a discovery if they exist!

Comment Re: Lies about Datacenters (Score -1) 34

YOU'RE THE ONE WHO'S WRONG. You're pathetically ignorant and brainwashed by the radical, anti-technology left. The new data centers don't use much water, are quiet (if they use gas turbines to generate power, the noise is shielded/insulated from the outside), and are designed to add more energy to the grid than they consume. They also create good tech jobs. ***GET EDUCATED***

Comment U of M should buy land elsewhere for data center (Score -1) 34

Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti, Michigan are liberal/progressive and Communist Democrat SEWERS that are reflexively against anything that advances technology such as AI/Nuclear Weapons research data centers. They actually don't use much water, they are quiet, and are designed to generate and put MORE energy into the grid than they consume. They also create good tech jobs. OF COURSE the lefties & commies are against it.

Comment Re: This isn't the EU. He's going to win. (Score 2) 242

I didn't word that carefully. You're not "denied" entry. In my experience they give you the option to turn back. If you insist you are legally allowed to enter the country and still refuse a search, then they will detain you and your devices until you comply.

Slashdot Top Deals

egrep -n '^[a-z].*\(' $ | sort -t':' +2.0

Working...