I'm not questioning you. I'd read it just on the author if it was available around here. Rather you should file it as among my personal problems. First, I'm trying to get rid of all of my books, not buy new ones. Second, I choose to live in Japan where the libraries basically treat English books as an afterthought. (By using lots of libraries I'm able to find enough good stuff to read, and I'm reading more and more Japanese books these years.) Third, my second and final Amazon purchase was decades ago...

Windows is crashing because users are doing things that cause crashes.

This issue needs to be investigated in MUCH more detail.

I don't have crashes.

So I ran the narrow search and got zilch, even in Japanese. Then on my mistake with Levy's book I ran that search, too. Still nothing. The broad search on "house" overflowed, but not just with some silly book about a prairie...

So now I'm off to search for Steven Levy books.

I use a meta-search that covers about 25 local library systems, and couldn't find any. (However I didn't fully expand some of the libraries that I don't have cards for. Depends on the local rules.)

Whoops. I should check but I trust you and know I've read that book, too. My bad.

Not an excuse, but the explanation is that both books were years ago and both authors write well. (But not difficult to write much better than I do.)

Actually I think you should have been more explicit. I'd guess the later Chamberlain, part of the appeasement thing, but I'd have to websearch and expose myself to AI to find out.

At this point I think the only way I would donate money to support Mozilla is if they promised NOT to change and break anything for some period of time.

And I think the only peace we're going to find around this world may be the peace of the grave.

This story is obviously a red herring. What they are worried about is the screens getting used too much and burning images into them.

Why would they care about burning out humans. Pesky nuisances whose main virtue is how cheap they are. But what do you expect when they are mass produced in such quantities but such unskilled labor?

Didn't dislike the FP, but the Subject was vacuous and should have at least hinted if you [Junta] were going for serious or funny. I'm definitely going for Funny, but it's funny I should say that when that trick never works. But I'll still check the Funny comments on the theory that finding the jokes was part of the moderators' job.

Trick that never works.

But I am personally offended by the original sloppy and vacuous Subject, apparently motivated by the lust to FP because of something Colbert said that made the rest of us laugh. Probably at the actual Insight, to be contrasted to whatever idiocy that motivated some moderator to designate such an FP as insightful.

A hug? Thanks? Or no thanks? Mostly seems like it's too late for that trick to help much.

I'd propose a solution approach, but the moderators have already declared this a no-Funny zone.

Congratulations. You have fed the troll and propagated its vacuous Subject. You can collect your prize... In Canada!

Japan's postal service uses lots of electric vehicles, both vans and motorcycles. Seem to work well enough, so I'm not really getting the target of your Funny. The YOB appointed a guy with a vested interest in destroying the postal service, and he seems to be accomplishing his mission.

Solutions? On Slashdot? ROFLMAO.

But what if we used email to make postal mail more convenient? A user-controlled linkage between email and physical address? Naw, that trick would never work.

And this is the only comment moderated Funny on the rich target story? Seems to be evidence that your joke is too true to be funny.

I actually have a funny idea about a solution, but it wouldn't be funny to waste much time on it given the current state of the Slashdot. But going for brevity, I think much of what ails us is confusion between "free" in the monetary sense and "freedom" in the important sense of allowing for new and innovative thoughts. From that perspective, the First Amendment needs a rewrite. Something to distinguish non-profit free speech from for-profit free speech with the profits subject to taxation. Dare I say progressive taxation? Or how about a higher tax rate if the profits are based on proven lies? Some of the tax revenue could even be used to compensate victims when the lies hurt people... Then consider it in light of copyright... With a higher tax rate for plagiarism? And what about persistent liars who aren't in it for the money? Religious fanatics come to mind. Already lost in the complexities. Yet another simplistic solution joke "trick that never works" in here somewhere.

Oh yeah. About the story. Reddit must be making money somehow or it would have gone away by now. But I've never found any value there, even before the AI slop arrived. I've looked the website many times going back many years, but I am unable to remember any examples of good or useful information that I got there. Some of it sounded interesting, but generally the more interesting the less plausible.

But at least it wasn't used for welding.

I concur and still remember many details from The Soul of a New Machine many decades after reading it. Makes me feel used up to hear that he's gone. And my age now feels too close to his...

Most recent of his books that I read was called Mountains Beyond Mountains about Dr Paul Farmer, another great man who died relatively young... Turns out I haven't been able to find any of his other books locally, which surprised me.

Regulators back then were understood to be particular type of highly accurate clock that was used as a baseline for time keeping: other clocks were set and updated based on the Regulator. The root word was also contemporaneously used in a medical context; e.g. regular bowel movements, regular heart beat. Later, it was applied to devices which control gas pressure.

Does that mean the government, (or the king, since the root of regular is Rex from Latin) had authority over those clocks, or was particularly concerned with his subjects intestinal health, or the pressure of their gas? Of course not.

I think that Subject was an artifact of a lust to FP. Care to explain? Most obvious candidate was "Only?", but I don't see how to fit it to the context. Maybe you mean that OpenAI should discontinue something else?

But I did have a funny idea. Another simplistic solution approach for the big problems (and of course doomed to fail for that reason among others). I'm a big believer in free speech, but here's a funny idea:

Should there be a tax on the profits from for-profit free speech?

Of course you should be able to say anything you want for free as in "no money involved", but once you start cashing in... And double the tax rate for proven lies. Then triple the rate for AI-generated drivel and hallucinations.

As they ramp up the AI we'll be able to pay off the national debt. No problem, except that all the money will be worthless.

(But my problem is that I think too slowly. Evidence that I'm human, not an AI. By the time I have an actual idea, it's the next day and the Slashdot discussion has already died... Dupes don't count, but I do think a solution approach would be for "good" stories to move more slowly down the top page.)