Comment Re:I Wonder (Score 1) 90
"I wonder if" - now that was an honest mistake.
Are you sure you're not an LLM?
"I wonder if" - now that was an honest mistake.
Are you sure you're not an LLM?
The fact that LLMs are tripping over themselves trying to be "Honest"
I think this is the result of their trainers trying to reduce hallucination. And hallucination *has* been reduced, so it's probably been largely successful, but it has produced this era of versions that are concerned about honesty, that claims of honesty or apologies for lack or honesty, are pervasive in their output.
But this is basic, basic, basic stuff. It's been committing things to git ever since it was built, and yet, it keeps tripping over itself.
My iron rule is that Claude is not allowed to modify git state, not even to stage or unstage, and definitely not to commit. As long as that rule is followed, any mistakes can be cleaned up easily.
Paying attention to stick shifts is something done by people who only very rarely drive them. For people who drive stick shifts daily they don't think about them at all, it's just a natural reaction.
And even people who don't drive stick regularly (but know how) quickly stop having to pay attention. I haven't owned a stick shift since the mid 90's, but I often get them when renting cars overseas. It takes a day or two of paying attention, and then it just becomes automatic and effortless.
there was no clutch. I just kicked the footwell for no reason.
BTDT when coming home from a trip where I'd been driving a manual for a couple of weeks.
Just about every motorcycle rider has intimate knowledge of manual shifting. If they are included, 60 percent could be about right.
About 3% of registered road vehicles are motorcycles. When you include dirt bikes the number of riders is higher, but it's still very low compared to the number of automobile drivers. I don't think motorcycle riders are likely to shift the overall numbers very much.
I wish it were that simple.
It is.
The problem is that you, the brave and the free of today are like the putin subjects - whining all the time that 'it ain't my job to watch over democracy' - so your politics gets more and more corrupted. And you get fucked.
Deservedly.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, I see.
Sometimes I wake up and start doing new science. But usually I just roll over and go back to sleep.
> The White House has strict ethics guidelines that we expect all staffers and officials to follow
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Good one.
The guideline in question is "Gotta kick up to the big guy". If you don't pay your "taxes", you're gonna have a bad day. And, no, I'm not talking about the IRS.
isn't even clearly defined
The definition is literally in the clause - the president gets a salary for being a president and nothing else.
Crystal clear.
I wish it were that simple.
First, note that there isn't one emoluments clause, there are two. And they're quite different.
The Foreign Emoluments clause prohibits any officer of the government, which would include the president, though that's not specifically stated, from accepting a "present" from any foreign government. The problem with this is that it's not clear how it's supposed to be enforced with respect to the president. Traditionally, presidents have treated gifts as gifts to the country, and when they wanted to make an exception they asked Congress to authorize it. Mostly. George Washington famously kept a painting the French gave him. Trump, er, took a different approach, simply ignoring the Foreign Emoluments clause, which the Constitution says isn't allowed... but then what? Congress never passed any law defining how exactly the clause was supposed to apply to the president (there are laws about not accepting gifts for pretty much everyone else in the executive branch)... so, how it might work is undefined.
During Trump's first term, a bunch of Congressional Democrats sued Trump for violating the Foreign Emoluments clause, and their suit was dismissed for lack of standing. Courts ruled that individual legislators (much less individual Americans) lack standing to sue over it, only Congress as a body has standing, and Congress as a body hasn't been interested in acting. There were also some suits by DC hospitality businesses claiming economic injury because foreign visitors chose Trump's properties to curry favor. The district court said they didn't have standing but that was reversed on appeal.. but never decided because it was mooted when he left office. The DC and Maryland governments sued and courts went back and forth on their standing, but that was never decided either, then mooted when he left.
So... at present there is no enforcement mechanism unless Congress creates one, or unless the courts decide that someone (and it's not clear who that might be) has standing. And we also have no idea what the remedies might be.
The Domestic Emoluments clause is more precise, but very narrow. It says Congress can't change the president's salary during their term, and that the president can't be paid by the federal government (other than his salary) nor any state government. That says nothing about Wall Street bros buying insider info, people paying for pardons, hodlers buying crypto to get a sit-down... none of that.
There's nothing wrong with storing some things *also* in cloud services.
But when it comes to copies of important things, two is one and one is none.
These platforms are starting to let people bet on wildfire activity. What a fun way of incentivizing arsonists.
"The algorithm to do that is extremely nasty. You might want to mug someone with it." -- M. Devine, Computer Science 340