"more than 340 million people live within 10 kilometers of data centers"
NOT ALL DATA CENTERS ARE FUCKING AI DATA CENTERS.
Living proof right there that using AI to think for you makes you stupid. The article was about all data centers, not just AI.
Exactly the same as the approach to the movie version of The Martian.
Yup, because those people intentionally looking to mislead or defraud others through the use of AI fakes are certainly going to follow this law to the letter...
Im sorry, but a whole load of those justifications are bullshit.
Yes, but 6.9m of those 27.6m don't have a car in the first place, and pretty obviously,
And how many of those 27.6m will have multiple vehicles?
and pretty obviously, those are more likely to be the households without the ability to park a car off-street.
No, thats very far from "obvious" at all. Very very far. So far, that its a reach.
Did you even look at the Google Maps link I sent? I'd say that under the current approach, a good proportion of the city of Norwich would not be able to charge their vehicle at home because they have no chance of off road parking.
- that still leaves at least 70% of cars / households able to charge at home offstreet compared to 0% able to refuel at home offstreet, which is a massive win for tens of millions of people, and obviously reduces pressure on the public charging network
The reason this doesnt matter for ICE is because refuelling ICE vehicles is a 5 minute matter and the infrastructure has been around to do that for what, a hundred years now?
Meanwhile, the infrastructure for charging EV vehicles anywhere other than very very specific locations right now is non-existent, and will consist of a MASSIVE build out which hasnt even started yet.
- tons of solutions for on-street charging are rolling out, from lamp-post to bollards to gullies
The problem is not that solutions theoretically exist, its that they are yet to be implemented on the scale required in order to achieve the switch over from ICE to EV that governments want to see.
Where is the funding for the roll out of those solutions? Wheres the wide scale planning for implementing those solutions?
- there's tons of other places to charge, including workplace charging
Laughable if you consider that most people don't have a parking spot at work and have to park either on-street near their work place or in a commercial car park. So the same issues apply here as well.
In addition to that, if EV charging spots arent excessively available in numbers then you are going to have an issue where someone parks up, hooks up and sits there for 8 hours while they work.
Once again its an issue of available infrastructure - 10 EV charge points for a road of 50 houses simply isnt going to cut it. You are going to have to have 50 charge points otherwise the shit is going to hit the fan at some point. And we both know that no government, local or national, is going to provide enough charging points for those that dont have off-road parking of their own.
- cars only need to be charged once every 10 to 14 days in the UK, given how much the average car is driven per day
Sorry but I want the ability to drive whatever distance I like at the drop of a hat, which means that my car would be plugged in whenever Im not using it to achieve that. My wife is a doctor who is regularly on call, so she *has* to be able to drive whatever distance she wants at the drop of a hat.
My problem is not EVs, my problem is the lack of infrastructure to support EVs and the timeline that governments want to have the general populace to switch over to EVs wholesale - there are deadlines in place, but theres absolutely fuck all funding at the scale required in order to build the corresponding infrastructure out.
People are used to the availability of "drive to the other end of the country and back again" at the drop of a hat in terms of infrastructure which supports that - for EV that does not exist right now, and its not going to exist a decade from now which is 5 years after the ICE ban in the UK - theres no mass roll out even planned yet, its all handwaving about "solutions exist for that". Great, put the solutions in place then!
Right now, successive governments have basically said "after 2030 you cant buy ICE vehicles - good luck!".
We saw more movement and planning around cable TV back in the 1980s and 1990s - this is so much more fundamentally important, and yet we arent seeing roads being dug up, or even being planned to be dug up.
That article is very nuanced - the exact wording is "18 million (65%) of Britain’s 27.6 million households having – or with the potential to have – enough off-street parking to accommodate at least one car or van".
Note the "or with the potential to have" - thats going to be peoples front or back gardens, with corresponding changes to drop curbs etc. Which still means significant investment at a property level to allow for that - who is going to pay for that?
Look at the streets here and tell me how these properties are going to fit into that report...
Theres still a lot more to it than purchase price, unfortunately.
When I was living in the UK, more than half the place I lived in would have had zero ability to charge an EV - the parking options were either on-road (and if you were lucky, within 3 streets of your house), or if you won the council lottery then you rented a garage within the local area. And no, you couldnt add an EV charger to the garage.
Where I live now, I have off street parking and the ability to add an EV charger - I fully expect my next car to be an EV.
But if I wasnt living here, if I was still living in the UK, then the problem of on-street parking and charging would still be a major blocker that I dont see being solved, properly solved, any time soon.
8GB ram will just eat swap and ware it out and you can't upgrade the storage as well.
My coming up to 4 years old 8GB Macbook Pro M2 hasn't. For daily stuff like media consumption, web browsing, document editing, light photo and video editing which is the bulk of what non-tech users do it's absolutely fine.
What is the purpose of these laws again? Has it been definitly proven that social media is bad for kids?
I don't belive it has, there have been studies suggesting it is bad, and other studies that find very little effect. Personally I don't think there's enough evidence to make a conculsion but I do know that passing laws based on moral panics is a very bad thing, and that appears to be what's going on. Also it's very obvious the laws aren't just about keeping kids healthy but also about surveillance, control and monetization of adults.
The Xbox has always been a PC-style architecture.
Xbox 360 wasn't.
One other thing we didnt have when the X Files (series or movie) came out was
The lack of a requirement to conform to a fixed schedule meant that your episodes can be as long as you want them to be - the last season of GoT ranges from 53 minutes to 81 minutes...
Series produced before the 1990s stayed fixed to a broadcast schedule - long episodes were two parters and few and far between. Which ultimately meant that writers wrote that way for a series - and now they are no longer constrained to a broadcast schedule, very rarely do two episodes in a headline series actually have the same runtime. They run as long as the writers and producers want them to run, as long as the budget holds out.
Make it myself? But I'm a physical organic chemist!
