Sorry but no, both you and the bbc need to realize that the USA is not the UK. This is a privately owned American company that does not do any business in the UK.
We are held to US law, not UK law or whatever made up law you're wanting.
If what they are doing is also illegal in the USA then they can be extradicted and be prosecuted. If international law worked on the principle of "well we did it from our country, not in yours" then nobody anywhere would ever be able to be prosecuted for financial fraud, theft etc. Fortunately for people like you it is a founding tenet of international law that you cannot direct harm in another country from your own and escape justice.
If you are using 4 digit PIN limited to the numbers 0-9, that's your own fault, and is not a strong PIN.
It's my fault that the service provider or software company only gave the option for using a 4 digit PIN?
Why didn't she take the bus?
Maybe there wasn't one? In my town there is one an hour in each direction that only goes in the direction of the major towns to the south or north, nothing going west and they only run between 6am and 8pm. If I need to go anywhere else than those places or I need to go at a time other than the scheduled time then public transport isn't an option. Welcome to living in a rural community.
These companies selling petroleum would stop selling petroleum if people stopped buying. If you bought petroleum then you share in the blame.
But making fuel for vehicles isn't the only thing that crude oil they drill and refine gets used for though is it? Many of the components in products in your home, things like the plastics your food comes wrapped in and even the device you posted your comment from also are made using oil.
That was different, that's "think of the children" , this is common citizen privacy, where you can expect much less enforcement.
Well ICO has just fined 23andMe £2.31m over their data breach in 2023 that exposed sensitive personal information, family histories, and health conditions. They also fined Facebook £500,000, the maximum fine at the time, back in 2018 for the Cambridge Analytica scandal just because Facebook had given app developers access to people's data "without clear consent". So yes we do carry out enforcement when it involves citizen privacy.
It's a chat app. The cost of running that core service is basically zero. (As evidenced by the number of free chat apps, IRC servers run gratis, etc)
The IRC servers have nothing remotely like the user count that Whatsapp does, nor do they offer anywhere near the same functionality nor uptime.
Which of those technologies do you think had the same rapid adoption as recent Gen-AI technologies like ChatGPT? Many of them were released at a time when less than 5% of the world's population had a personal computer, so how could they possibly have the same level of adoption as a technology released when over two-thirds of the world's population has access to the Internet?
CD-ROM. You don't need a computer to use a CD-ROM and the CD-ROM pre-dated the invention of the WWW by a decade. The primary use CD-ROM dwas audio in hi-fi systems, portable devices like Walkmans and Ghetto Blasters, car stereos.
One tech executive recently told me his company had stopped hiring anything below an L5 software engineer — a midlevel title typically given to programmers with three to seven years of experience
2030...."Technology sector in crisis due to a shortage of skilled and experienced programmers."
Posting anon for obvious reasons.
You're the one who's full of shit - I am a literal, recent example of OP's point.
I recently pirated the entire series run of a show that ended several years back, that I'd never seen, because it was shown on one of the American premium cable networks.
I *did* check the price to buy it - anywhere from $80 to $120, depending on format. To me, for a show that ended more than 5 years ago and was wildly popular, (which means it was profitable in first run,) that's not just unacceptable, it's unconscionable.
You're just confirming what they said. You could have got it legitimately but chose to pirate instead because you didn't want to pay for it and all the excuses that you're trotting out is you trying to justify to yourself that you're still an upstanding law abiding person.
That's not entirely correct. Here's a real life example. Almost all of my top 50 favorite movies and TV shows are spread across no less than 8 (eight) streaming services. 41 of them have no option of pay-per-view, forcing me to pay subscriptions to watch them. 21 of them are not available in my country through any legal option due to geofencing, exclusivity rights, other bullshit (to me, as a customer) reasons.
Worth mentioning none of those are actually ultra-rare, as a matter of fact they are all well-known movies and TV shows. Some of them could be considered "cult classics" in their genre.
Just a few examples, no point in getting the whole list: Jericho, Serenity, Firefly, Dogma. I can't watch any of them legally.
F1TV isn't available in my country. I still subscribe to it and pay for it using a VPN. So I'm sorry but the claim that 21 of them aren't available in your country as a justification for piracy is just bullshit especially given that you'll already be using a VPN to hide your piracy. There is nothing stopping you using a VPN to connect to servers in the country where these services are available and subscribing to them.
Ethically, I won't give money to Rupert Murdoch.
Murdoch hasn't owned Sky for some time. It's owned by Comcast.
The price is typically less than a quarter of what you'd pay for roughly the same crap from a US manufacturer, but it will be in metric units.
I'm quite sure that the 192/195 countries of the world that use metric will manage to cope somehow.
Or just hit control C on the console and shut that shit down.
Did you miss the part of the article where it said that in some cases the AI re-wrote the kill command so it wouldn't work anymore? AI redefines CTRL-C and you're not closing it down.
ASCII a stupid question, you get an EBCDIC answer.