Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Louisiana has more foliage ... (Score 1) 174

Cape Canaveral is completely surrounded by wildlife refuge and national seashore. Heck, the tour bus I went on there had to stop for a while to avoid a bald eagle that was eating its breakfast on the road in front of it. There are exactly zero homes in that area that don't have a massive amount of "Plant leaves, especially tree leaves, considered as a group." between the homes and the launch area. The me actually being there to see for myself that I've seen confirm that the area _around_ that area you've seen pictures of is very much the opposite of devoid of foliage.

Comment Re:Just like in Texas (Score 1) 174

Oh, a whole year of wearing the tags! At least at certain public events, anyway. Definitely not at his political event appearances for some odd reason.... I mean, Jebus, how naive can you be (if this is indeed naivete)? Doing some choreographed PR designed to sanitize his public image after he damaged it with some major anti-semitism is obviously insincere on its face.

Comment Re:Bullshit detected (Score 1) 185

For all of that, it doesn't take into account the nightmare of working on them. BMW's vaunted engineers apparently cannot make their "high performance" engines kinda easy to work on. And while the parts aren't cheap, so much labor is involved in just getting to them. The question then becomes - is all of this fussiness and ready to self destruct worth it?

Oh, I don't personally think it's worth it. As I pointed out, it does pretty much nothing to help during regular driving and it absolutely makes them a huge pain to work on.

BMW engineers and management and bean counters appear to have determined that they control their customers. Now as for maintenance - My son's car didn't have any lack of maintenance issues. We got rid of his BMW before any such timing belt replacement was needed. What capped off our experience was a rear main seal blowout. That was going to require a lot of money, and I decided no sunk cost fallacy was going to happen.

There are a number of things that have caused that blowout, many of them related to the same emphasis on trying to squeeze out as much performance per unit mass and volume from the engine that leads to using interference engines. Reliance on turbocharging, for one, leading to more pressurized gas getting past the piston rings. Or just in general high rpms and other factors causing the crankshaft to get loose and wobbly after a while. Basically that same attitude that "engineering" means that you squeeze out performance in exchange for needing a lot of maintenance to stop things from failing.

Comment Re:Total BS (Score 1) 185

None of that invalidates the reasoning that certain integrated features might need it. I don't care much either way, just stating some of the reasons why the volume might use something other than a potentiometer on the radio itself to control volume. The simple fact of the matter is that there's generally not a separate set of speakers for every system in the car that the designers might want to be able to produce sound. So if you want to handle that, you need a unified sound mixing/volume control system. Ideally you want the sound system to be digital pretty much right up to the speakers. If you have a potentiometer that directly controls an analog signal amplification right on the radio itself, you're basically asking for an audio system with all kinds of hissing and popping from amplifying noise and with the potential for accidentally blowing out the speakers, etc. This is just a consequence of having a modern, integrated sound system.

Comment Re:Total BS (Score 1) 185

There is a reason not to have both - Because there's absolutely no reason volume needs to go anywhere beyond a pot inside the radio. The entire rest of the car doesn't need to know or be able to override the physical position of that pot.

A lot of cars now have features where they lower the fan speed on the HVAC system when a call comes in. They also override it for alerts from the car (like when it's trying to warn you that you're going to hit a pedestrian because the car is momentarily pointed at them on a slight curve, and even though they are on a sidewalk with a raised curb and everything). They can always find some reason that a feature might need that kind of control.

Comment Re:Total BS (Score 1) 185

What I really love* is the onscreen messages that some cars pop up, sometimes after the car has been started and underway, warning you to pay attention while driving and requiring you to hit something like "OK" at the bottom of the screen.

* Note sarcasm. In fact I don't love this since it is the sort of idiocy that gets people killed.

Comment Re:Bullshit detected (Score 1) 185

It all depends on what you mean by "engineering". Some people mean designed for reliability, and some mean designed for performance, for example. For example, pretty much all modern BMWs are interference engines, meaning that pistons and valves are physically capable of colliding. Packing them in like that gives a performance and efficiency boost. Not an absolutely massive one, but decent enough. It allows more power with a smaller engine, which means weight savings, etc., etc. The problem is that if anything goes wrong with the timing chain, the engine rips itself apart. It doesn't even have to break, just end up a bit too stretched or misaligned because some of the fiddly little pieces that hold it in place fail/come loose/crack/etc. Basically it means that you really have to take the maintenance schedule seriously about replacing the timing chain at the scheduled intervals. Except it also means that, when the chain is replaced, you (or the mechanic) absolutely can not mess up because you don't get a second chance.

So, basically, for BMW, for the interference engine situation, and many other things in the car, they have chosen the definition of engineering where everything is sacrificed for that little bit of extra performance/efficiency that mostly only applies if you're racing the thing. So, like you say overly complicated and fussy, and also strict maintenance requirements and strict requirements for expertise for the maintainer otherwise things go badly wrong.

Comment Re:A MOLD? with spores? (Score 1) 77

Oh dear... That synopsis... empty gas tanks almost immediately, all the plastic in the world eaten in a few days... I mean, the basic concept is interesting, but obviously yet another book on an interesting idea written by someone whose understanding of some basic concepts is essentially magical thinking or just cartoonish. I mean, empty gas tanks instead of being full of the microbe and its excretions? Probagating worldwide in days?

Comment Re:Knock me over with a feather (Score 1) 77

Well, the price certainly has the potential to come down. For one thing, a big part of it now sounds like its mostly in breaking down the plastic before the yeast eats it. The current process sounds like it's basically boiling the plastic while adding oxygen, possibly in a pressure cooker. There may be all sorts of ways to improve that. Scale, for one thing. Aside from that though, doing it at higher pressure, with added catalysts or chemicals for it to directly react with, etc. may make the pre-processing much easier. Same for then feeding to the yeast. Various factors like the structure of the containers it occurs in, temperature, ph, the exact composition of the matrix, and other conditions. Also, heat can be recovered from the previous batch to heat up the next batch so it uses less energy. Then there's the yeast itself. The current version is a proof of concept, but there's no reason to think that they developed the most voracious and efficient organism the first time around. They may be able to produce something vastly more productive.
As it is, from what I can find, the average price of cookies per kg is anywhere from about $8 to $35. So, let's put this into perspective using the lower end of that. We will ignore for the moment that the cookies are just a proof of concept and no-one is actually saying let's directly turn plastic waste into cookies. The point is just that we can turn it from essentially non-biological material back into biological material. So, these are $60 per kilogram, then they are 7.5X more expensive than regular cookies. Improving this process to make it 7.5X cheaper or at least somewhere in that range seems like it might well be possible.

Comment Re:So what (Score 1) 145

The requirement for submitting books has not been needed for copyright since the Berne convention. Technically, there is still a requirement for published works, except that it has been found unconstitutional on fifth amendment grounds, though it also would seem to violate the first as well. It is also insanely impractical in this day and age. As it stands there are millions of US published books not in the LOC, and of course, it's not like books published in the US constitute all of the books published anywhere. The simple matter is that some objects, though ownership does pass from person to person do have the aspect of a public charge tied to them. True, the owner can go ahead and use them as firewood and be legally covered (though not in all cases, since there are in fact cultural heritage laws around the world that might actually still make it illegal) people are also completely entitled to find that morally shocking and the people who do it to be scum.

Comment Re:Just like in Texas (Score 1) 174

You are spot on. Elon Musk literally wore a necklace honoring the Jewish victims of an attack for over a year and people still called him a Nazi.

Yes, that's kind of like how people who run someone over with their car and then go to an alcohol treatment program ordered by a judge still get called dangerous drunks. Or, in other words, you're skipping over the precipitating events to him receiving that pendant and making sure to to display it at public events. Those events involved him doing clearly anti-Semitic things. I hardly find a publicity stunt like that convincing.

Comment Re:Well of course they are focusing on AI. (Score 1) 98

Your example is great 20 x 14 is 10 x 14 x 2, which is precisely how I would calculate that in my head. 22 x 14 is (10 x 14 x 2) + (14 x 2). That's easy to do once you understand it, but the schools don't teach that, I can't explain the way they teach it, it's beyond me, it involved boxes, counting, colours, it was f'ing insane.

My understanding of the idea behind common core math is that their goal was exactly that students should develop an understanding of math that would allow them to easily spot all the different ways they could do such calculations easily. I think the problem was that a lot of their methods come from people who understand the concepts already and think that their methods are nicely illustrative of the concepts, but who don't grasp that they only illustrate the concepts if you already actually know what's behind them. Then you end up with the reality with the boxes, counting, colours, etc. where the actual students mind is reeling and they're saying to themselves "what the hell is going on here, why are we doing this!" even more than with the way it was previously taught. It's even worse when they expect the student to "show their work" with by drawing the boxes, ribbons, whatever for themselves. That's just adding 40%+ to the time of each problem when the student isn't thinking about math at all, they're drawing the same boring thing over and over on autopilot. It's not like that kind of thing is entirely new of course. I mean, thinking back, I wish I'd had a unit circle stamp and a stamp pad. Because, seriously, what was the point of drawing it over and over and over? Once you'd done it a few times, it was just a waste of time to draw it yourself. So, basically common core took that sort of thing and magnified it.

Slashdot Top Deals

The use of anthropomorphic terminology when dealing with computing systems is a symptom of professional immaturity. -- Edsger Dijkstra

Working...