I linked to one below

Yes, my blog is terribly written. :-D

But the rest of what you says is utterly wrong.

Have a look at the paper I pointed earlier in this thread on patients kept alive using his protocol.

The basis of Dr. Seyfried's work is that the 'nuclear DNA mutations cause cancer' theory is wrong. It's the mitochondria. This is shown by research where nucleus from cancer cells transplanted into normal cells resulted in a normal cell. And when mitochondria aretransplanted from a cancer cell to a normal cells, that gave rise to a cancer cell.

You can't fault a man for who he happens to talk to, otherwise you'd be condemning Jesus too. I don't know what he told Mercola; maybe "here's a smarter way to think about this"? :)

Have a look at the paper I pointed earlier in this thread on patients kept alive using his protocol.

The basis of Dr. Seyfried's work is that the 'nuclear DNA mutations cause cancer' theory is wrong. It's the mitochondria. This is shown by research where nucleus from cancer cells transplanted into normal cells resulted in a normal cell. And when mitochondria aretransplanted from a cancer cell to a normal cells, that gave rise to a cancer cell.

Here is one:

https://www.frontiersin.org/jo...

Kiryttopoulos and colleagues (2024), "Successful application of dietary ketogenic metabolic therapy in patients with glioblastoma: a clinical study," Frontiers in Nutrition, vol. 11, article 1489812. Seyfried is a contributing author.

Thanks for the tip!

Yes, that's because I put some useful cancer info there. Don't let this upset you - I earn no dime from that blog.

One of the most important info there is on Dr Seyfried work. His approach has kept patients alive - one pancreatic cancer patient alive for 6 years and a glioblastoma patient alive for a couple of decades. His approach relies on continuous glucose and ketone measurement. I've calculated my GKI using a glucose meter, and it can get complicated pricking yourself twice, running two test strips, doing the ratio, etc.

Here's a good overview on Dr. Seyfried's work:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...

I am promoting Dr. Seyfried. I am not Dr. Seyfried.

Dr Thomas Seyfried's work on dietary approaches to treating cancer uses Glucose-Ketone Index (GKI) -- a simple way to track how effectively you're shifting away from glucose metabolism toward ketone metabolism. The cancer patient makes dietary decisions to drive their GKI numerical value in the low single digits.

GKI Calculation:
GKI = Blood glucose à Blood ketones

Target Ranges:
General cancer management: GKI 2-3
Active treatment: GKI 1-2
Advanced/aggressive cancers: GKI below 1 (temporarily, with medical supervision)

Normally, you test fasting glucose and ketones upon waking. But continuous measurement provides a lot more insight.

I wrote a blog about GKI and other 'self care' approaches here:
https://enconsed.blogspot.com/...

The screen that matters is the windscreen. Nothing should compete with it

A related phenomenon is, Holocaust survivors live(d) longer. There is no good explanation and repeating the experiment is, thankfully, quite impossible...

Simply the Forbes link was enough to confirm this point

Nope. One link is not enough — from the very beginning I asked, that each citation consist of two links: one to the prediction being made, the other — to confirmation/discussion of it coming true. Another rule was, the two links must be at least 5 years apart.

The purpose is easy to understand. A person can privately record 20 predictions of, say, an average temperature somewhere changing from -10 to +9 degrees. Five years later one of them will have made a precise match, and Forbes will write about him. If you didn't know about his 19 other predictions, you'll be impressed... This is why I insist on the prediction to have been published — prominently — ahead of time.

you purposely ignore the arguments

Because I was not asking for arguments — I was asking for citations...

We now have a NUMBER for the value of these data breaches. Time for the Lawyers to use this metric to go after every single data breach.