Correct. Breaking is entirely irrelevant to this discussion.

If something breaks, it's on me. This is about companies being able to take something away that isn't broken at all, at any time they choose, without any refund.

For any other item that'd be theft and would land them in jail.

You see, there is one thing that is called "propaganda". It is what you have eaten up. Then there is another thing called "reality" or "actual intent". It is something entirely different.

Seems they cannot even get basic things done reliably now.

Actually, I like watching the stunt men and special effects.

Nah, they're just jealous that other people's fuckups have been dominating the news, and they want some of that old-fashioned media love too.

I haven't been to the cinema since 2917, because everything was already too boring and predictable to watch. Let alone pay for.

I'm a busy man. I'm also a lazy man. Could someone tell me if this is cheaper or more expensive than a desktop gaming PC with the same stats?

I guess they have to do this. But it will slow down adoption. You can probably get a Linux-capable and about as powerful system for a fraction of that from the Win11 hardware apocalypse...

There are obviously tons of people offering services like that, because there are tons of "students" that do not actually want to learn anything. Most just never get caught. Also, obviously, the students graduating this way will find their "expertise" to be worthless.

Fortunately, there are still (and probably always will be) enough students that actually want to learn and evolve their skills. We educators owe it to them to separate them from the dross though.

You must be somebody that watches porn for the character development and the story...

It gets a bit better when you systematically do "do not recommend channel" on all the YouTube slop, but it is still bad. In particular, channels pushing complete fabrications vor views are apparently totally fine for YT these days. Personally, I just have a small number of people for whom I look at content, and apart from the (rare) doom-scrolling, I ignore the rest.

Seriously, were are we? In kindergarten?

Funny how inhumane scum like you always thinks you are in the right. FYI, you are one of those that make large-scale evil possible because you understand nothing.

Have you ever considered that pointing out that "x is bad" does not in any way imply "y is good".

No, they do not demonstrate any "expert level capabilities". Experts always understand the "why", not just the "how". LLMs are incapable of that.

I do agree that review effort for LLM output is probably what kills their use in most application scenarios.