Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Who cares (Score 0) 71

Because it's not really Apple or Samsung that are suffering. It's us. The consumers who are literally paying for the benefit of stagnation and lack of choice.

Apple and Samsung like the weather in Hell just fine.

Um, what? Apparently you don't remember what passed for a smartphone in 2006. Apple completely revolutionized phones and deserves all the credit, everyone else just copied what Apple did, and Apple got tired of them copying. We were suffering in 2006, now we are living great with technology straight from Star Trek.

Comment Re:Automation and unemployment (Score 2) 602

So what's this "new economy" going to look like? I think we need look no further than Greece which has a thriving black market labor market. So here's how I see the future of US unskilled labor. Work will be done by robots, by part-time employees or whatever loophole status saves employers the most money, and by people working completely off the books. All which are already happening. I see this getting worse, unless we return to a saner employment policy.

Couldn't have said it better myself. US govt seems to doing all it can to make it more difficult for the middle class

Comment Re:Shrug (Score 1) 424

No, she doesn't. The person bringing the suit (the construction company) has to prove that what she said is false.

You are mistaken as regards libel. If she made an allegation on a matter of fact, she has to be able to show it is true. It's not up to him to show it was false.

Yes but it's so wide open it would be very difficult to prove she's lying. She says they damaged her house, he says they didn't. Good luck proving they did zero damage. Unless they have a signed affidavit from her stating everything was perfect and there was no damage then she can say there was damage. Only way they could possibly win against her is if they've never heard of her and they never did work on her house at all.

if this lawsuit worked then car manufactures could sue eveytime someone wrote a review saying a car interior felt "cheap". And how are they going to prove $750,000 in loss sales are directly because of her review? If she counter-sues they're screwed because she'll likely win

Comment Re:Chu! (Score 1) 305

It's so refreshing having a Secretary of Energy that actually knows something about energy and physics, rather than somebody who just knows how to dig carbon out of the ground.

Why is this sarcastic comment marked insightful?? Chu setup the impossible goals of 5x more energy AND 5x cheaper in 5 years! Clearly has no clue how batteries work and thinks by requesting magic to happen it will! That's +1 Funny! What's next, 5x more efficient cars for 5x cheaper in 5 years? ROFLMAO

5x more energy is possible. 5x cheaper is possible. 5x more energy AND 5x cheaper in only 5 years is so impossible that it is funny, but damn politicians like to make statements that rhyme or sound good together and idiots believe them: "it's my 555 plan!! 5x more for 5x less in 5 years!! VOTE ME!!"

Comment Re:What's up! (Score 0) 186

Because in 2012 the truth doesn't matter, only what can be proven. So first they had to figure out what evidence there was.

Then you'll be happy to know that Seagate bought Samsungs hard drive division in 2011, not the other way around, so I don't see how he could be biased AGAINST Samsung when Samsung lost their hard drive division to Seagate. If he hates Seagate, then he should feel sorry for Samsung for losing their hard drive division to Seagate, right? Maybe Apple should sue because the foreman was biased for Samsung and a billion isn't enough LOL.

Also isn't it the job of Samsungs lawyers to ask the jury members questions during jury selection to make sure they're not biased? Samsung should be suing their lawyers for missing this, it's not apple's fault.

Comment Re:Editors... (Score 1) 293

Yeah, I have to say. This is absurd. I've been here since '98, '99. This is the worst I've seen it. Come on, some basic checking would be a start.

Maybe it's time to auction off my userid.. Though I don't know why anyone would want it. There's just no prestige anymore.

I started 98 or 99, you must have started early 98 since according to Wikipedia slashdot started sept 97

Comment Re:Editors... (Score 4, Insightful) 293

So how did this get posted? Obvious fake is obvious, but whoever created the site could now change it to some spammy malware site and nothing can be done, it's already been linked to by /. and probably dozens of other sites, the fake site is probably top ranked on google now for dozens of search terms. This is not good /., things like this is why after 15 years I don't visit /. as much as I use to, and it's sad a site like reddit has better editors than /.

Comment Re:Put badge in microwave for 10 seconds. (Score 1) 743

Isn't that what school is? Conform to what we want you to know?

In theory, the purpose of a public school system is to benefit the public and to break aristocracies (whose power is often maintained by a continued and exclusive access to quality education). In practice, the purpose of school is to babysit children while their parents are out working, because in today's world it is too dangerous for children to run wild in the streets (according to some). Brainwashing and teaching conformity are just unintended consequences of poorly thought out policies by the sort of bureaucrats who think scantron forms are a way to measure student aptitude (don't kid yourself: the people who are paid to educate children are not clever enough to develop a grand strategy for brainwashing them, and neither are the major party politicians who control school budgets; metal detectors, surveillance cameras, bars over the windows, etc. are just easy and lawyer-friendly ways to address the symptoms of broader problems).

And someone please explain what expectation of privacy a child should have on public property

How about the right to go to the bathroom without being watched?

Does she complain about security cameras too?

I would have. Considering that at my high school, holding a blank postboard in front of a security camera resulted in the guards running to the camera to see what was happening, while an actual fistfight (a rarity at my high school) didn't result in guards coming at all, it is pretty clear that the cameras have nothing to do with student safety (and neither do the guards).

Unless she plans on flipping burgers she better get use to badges and logins.

Or, people could learn to stand up for themselves and fight back against these sorts of things. I am a graduate student, and when my department was moved into a new building where our student ID cards were used as keys to our offices, and our doors could not be propped open without horribly loud alarms going off, we fought back. Eventually we got a compromise -- we could prop open our doors 9-5 on weekdays, so only the first person to come to the office would have to swipe in. There is a broader problem here, and your response is a symptom of it: people have no desire to stand up for themselves, and they just let themselves get trampled by this sort of thing. This is where we come full circle, of course, since school is where people learn to be trampled -- unless they are wealthy and go to a school that teaches them how to trample others. So really, our public education system is failing to meet the goals it was originally created for (but we are too busy complaining about the UFT and about test scores to even notice that).

No one is watching them use the bathroom, you're being ridiculous. They know if a student is in a bathroom or not, which is no different than if a teacher watched a student enter the bathroom.

Badges like these have huge benefits: access to computer labs or other secure areas, instant login to computers, evening and weekend access to school property, reduce theft, vandalism and bullying, etc. These badges are so full of win i wish i had them when i was in high school. She's very fortunate to be going to a school that offers such nice stuff and her parents want to fight it on religious grounds?? What's next, sue the school for offering free wifi?

Comment Re:Simple Science (Score 1) 305

She have chosen to fight the problem directly instead of playing a cat and mouse game with the school first. Our society is currently built in a way that makes this preferable so I can see why she decided to do that.

Judge is probably just doing it to clear the air, so a legal ruling can come out saying "Yes, the school has the right to know where every student is at all times while they are on school property." That seems so obvious I don't know how anyone can argue against it. Who wants the school to say "We don't know where your child is. They are not in class and we called over the intercom and they didn't come. Sorry"

Badges like these could have huge benefits: Access to computer labs or other secure areas, instant login to computers, evening and weekend access to school property, reduce theft, vandalism and bullying, etc. These badges are so full of win i wish i had them when i was in high school

She's very fortunate to be going to a school that offers such nice stuff and her parents want to fight it on religious grounds?? What's next, sue the school for offering free wifi?

Comment Re:Simple Science (Score 1) 305

And get expelled for destruction of school property, great idea.

yeah because no one has ever accidentally left their badge in their pocket and washed the clothes.

but she might want to hang on to that badge, if they actually use the badges for security they could have certain rooms that might require the badge to gain access like computer labs, etc.

it's funny to watch people fight the progression of technology though, 20 yrs from now we'll look back and think "wtf how did schools function without smart security badges?"

Slashdot Top Deals

After a number of decimal places, nobody gives a damn.

Working...