"We have no phone home or registration process, so it's always a guesstimate. But based on the same methodology that we came up with for the 2008 number, our present belief is that it's somewhere north of 12 million users at the moment," Chris Kenyon, vice president for OEM at Canonical, told InternetNews.com
Just in case you were wondering, Fedora still claims more — actually almost double at 24 million.
What Murdoch and the rest of the 'Content Kings' don't get is that content is no longer king.
These guys should be happy that they are getting my attention - that I'm literally paying them attention. You want me to pay money on top of me paying attention? Forget it. The whole world has a press now and there are millions of people out there - with interesting or intelligent or entertaining or titillating or whatever content - that would be just happy for me to paying them attention.
Murdoch seems to be attempting to hypnotise the public into thinking we need his stuff so badly we'll be prepared to pay for it. We don't.
China will never budge on these issues (at least not in my lifetime)
I think you're being overly pessimistic. The Soviet Union only lasted from 1922 to 1991. Everyone born during that period who's still alive today outlived it, including some people who were born before its inception. The People's Republic of China was only founded in 1949. Again, I think it's quite likely that a large proportion of people alive today will outlive it.
If you need a leaked document to know that spies are spying, you fail at life.
"you fail at life" -- What's with the juvenile hyperbole? The basis of empiricism is confirmation of hypotheses. It's good to get detailed confirmation of (an almost certain) suspicion. And the detail is what is interesting here.
p.s. It wasn't a leaked document. It was two documents released under a FOI request.
This reminds me of the original name for the Daihatsu Applause, before they did their complete model name reaction testing.
Unless I'm mistaken, in the comment I replied to, your name appears as plain text at the end of your comment. I have had signatures turned off since when I created my account (for so long actually that I'd forgotten that I'd even turned them off). But I still see a plain text signing off.
The reason I find your name (or anyone else's name) distracting at the end of a comment is it takes away from the pure content of the comment. I read it, process it, and then [thunk] your name momentarily derails my chain of thought as I move on to the replies. I want to just focus on the debate, or conversation. If I want to, I can see who wrote the comment in the comment title. Where there is also a place to link to your website or personal page.
Bruce, I've been reading your comments on Slashdot for the last ten years. Appreciate your input.
Now a small request. Can you leave off signing your name at the end of your comment? Your name is clearly spelt out at the top of your comment (as your user name). You and a few other people have this habit and it's quite annoying.
The two included quotes and your own comment are linguistic rubbish. Sorry to be so blunt. You have been upvoted because people love hearing these kind of stories about the 'mysterious' Chinese script.
Please have a read of The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy by John DeFrancis before you go spouting any more such stories.
I think there's a world market for about five computers. -- attr. Thomas J. Watson (Chairman of the Board, IBM), 1943