Comment Re:Manufacturing is back but not the jobs (Score 1) 67
Eventually, almost all jobs will be gone. Then who will the one percenters sell their products to?
Eventually, almost all jobs will be gone. Then who will the one percenters sell their products to?
But this just means people's donations don't get to where they wanted them to go. Everyone should demand their donations be returned now, so they can send the donations in by another means
And what does PayPal do about all those false chargebacks?
The people that would shoot the executives in the head do not need PayPal. They have their own money methods.
And I stopped using EBay (and dumped my 300 shares stock holdings in it) mostly because of PayPal. That was years ago.
Demand your money back from PayPal today. When they get more than $45k worth of donors demanding their money back, then what are they going to do? What if ALL donors demand their money back? What if people start suing PayPal to get their money back (all individual lawsuits)?
The government should have shut them down years ago.
Did you actually demand your money back from PayPal? I think people should do exactly that now
Looks like I don't buy things from you.
What if the donors start demanding their donations be returned to them
It was bad and unethical back then. It's worse now.
They should have designed OpenID so that people can run their own identity servers. They sorta did, but it still requires going through a big provider that can track you. That was stupid.
An alternative idea still requires a big provider, but at least logins do not need to go through them so there is no point of tracking you. That idea is to use signed certificate identities. The service you login into only needs to trust the CA that signed your identity.
Or just don't worry about having a like identity, and just have web sites do a standard registration process that a browser module/plugin uses with your secure key ring that you put these identities (can be different at different sites) into. This can work better by having identities that work like those on StackExchange.
Nobody said it'd be the user of the device that employs those circumvention methods.
It doesn't matter how secure the key exchange is, if the hacker has access to your keys, for instance by having a backdoor into the OS or app that uses the keys.
Or in other words, a public key from a key pair isn't worth shat if the private key can be compromised.
I think this very much depends on where the trial happens, UK or US. IANAL - but my understanding of US copyright law - you generally can't copyright lists of things like facts. For instance - from a lawsuit a very long time ago - you can't copyright the information in a phone book. So - if you can get away with the argument that a compilation is merely a list of songs - that is a winning argument for Spotify. I have no idea what the take on this is in the UK - so your mileage may vary considerably.
Agree with first sentence, second and third sentence make me wonder just how psychotic you really become when you see someone in a tie. Is it like triggering the hulk? Or is it like a cartoon bull seeing something red?
It's more the feeling of seeing a cockroach.
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
