Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Long-term costs (Score 5, Insightful) 294

already has significant training procedures to accommodate big processes (like, say, a government would have),

HAHAHA! Thanks for the laugh.

I speak from experience when I tell you you're dreaming if you think government has training procedures. We have a training group and my area (the IT side) does more to train end users than they do. We keep wondering why we're paying these people when everyone comes to us with training questions.

Comment Re:Opt-in though? (Score 4, Insightful) 131

As long as the feature is opt in...

The "opt in" was more like "we're making you an offer you can't refuse." It was pushed as an update to an existing add-on. The page with the terms was deliberately confusing. The privacy policy was originally missing. Some users reported that if you refused the tracking, the add-on then blocked major sites such as Flickr.

I was amazed that got past Mozilla's approval process. They've sold out.

Comment Too much remote control (Score 4, Interesting) 487

Tesla is about to push an 'over-the-air update' to its vehicles' air suspension that will create more ground clearance at highway speeds.

Now that scares me. The suspension can be updated remotely? What could possibly go wrong? Just how good is the security on that? Who has access to the keys? Are you sure? How are the download servers secured? Is the update system protected against cut-and-paste attacks?

That kind of update could be used as an assassination weapon.

When Tesla was talking about automatic driving, I suggested that there must be a second processor, with completely different software, checking the main system for sanity (like "not approaching obstacle at high speed") and able to force a stop. The backup system should have its program in ROM, and changing that program should require breaking seals and physically plugging in a new program module.

Flight control software for airliners works like that. For the Airbus line, the backup software was written by a different team for a different kind of CPU in a different programming language, to avoid any possibility of a common mode failure.

Comment Mozilla does that too. (Score 4, Interesting) 131

Mozilla allows that, too. There's a slimeball company that takes over abandoned Firefox add-ons, adds spyware, and puts them up on Mozilla's "store". They did this to BlockSite. Users were very angry.

Mozilla's reaction? Mozilla's add-on policies prohibit this: "Whenever an add-on includes any unexpected* feature that ... compromises user privacy or security (like sending data to third parties)" ... "These features cannot be introduced into an update of a fully-reviewed add-on; the opt-in change process must be part of the initial review." The spyware was just fine with Jorge Villalobos, Mozilla's add-on project manager, who wrote "That's outdated, since we don't enforce that policy."

You can't trust the Mozilla Foundation any more. That's sad.

Comment Of course. They're dispatched. (Score 1) 409

Of course police cars should be tracked. They're dispatched centrally, after all. The dispatchers need to know who's where.

Traditionally, the approach used is to put cops in small patrol areas ("beats") so dispatch knows roughly where they are. But this is an ineffective use of resources. Dispatch should be moving cops around as necessary depending on the level of activity and coverage.

Comment I would opt for a different method (Score 1) 191

Between radio SETI and optical SETI, new technology is inevitable, technology that can be patented or sold. Isolating data from a planet orbiting a star is going to require variable interferometry of a sort we don't yet have. New algorithms will be needed, as you can't sift through billions of channels for information content efficiently with what we have.

This means you can have a well-defined ROI even if nothing is ever found. And that means you can value SETI in terms of that ROI, which means you can float SETI on the market. Make it something with worth defined in terms others can understand.

Just as importantly, make it something the government regrets ignoring. They can talk all they like about the benefits of private enterprise, but they have legal restrictions on buying foreign technology or using the services of people without clearance. Signals analysis is signals analysis, meaning Russia and China will likely be involved in any open research, meaning the US will have all kinds of legal hoops to jump through. That or buy the shares in some way, thus funding the work and keeping sigint stuff out of the hands of imagined enemies.

In short, use the obsession with private funds to back Five Eyes against the wall. Give these nations no choice but to give SETI the money needed.

Comment Re:How about NEW cars? (Score 3, Informative) 487

Yes.... but typically a Tesla has no gasoline on board. You'd think that a lack of chance of fire would be a Tesla selling point.

Accelerating a car takes energy. That energy has to be stored on board the car. Whenever you store a lot of energy in a small space, there is a risk that the energy could be released. Gasoline is not uniquely dangerous in that respect.

Doing 70 on the freeway and running over some debris is neither high speed, nor a collision.

70 miles per hour is high speed. The car collided with the debris.

Comment Re:More TSA thinking (Score 0) 487

This is probably all a stupid kneejerk reaction.

An excellent description of the remainder of your post. Unless you've actually talked to the people involved in making that decision, or conducted your own equivalent investigation, you have no idea whether it's justified or not. Your knee is jerking because you've found an excuse to grind your favorite axe.

Comment Re:People are bad (Score 2) 487

If Tesla gains enough 'momentum' and mainstream acceptance (industry is large enough to gain its own power brokers), you will start seeing sensational articles about how great the Tesla is.

I hate to ruin a beautiful theory with facts, but we've already seen plenty of sensational articles about how great the Tesla is.

Comment One big difference (Score -1, Flamebait) 487

How many cars are on the road compared to how many Teslas?

If you have tens of millions of cars and trucks (pickup trucks) on the U.S. roads, you are bound to have many fires for various reasons.

When you only have a few thousand of a specific car on the road and several catch fire, you need to ask questions and investigate.

Slashdot Top Deals

A large number of installed systems work by fiat. That is, they work by being declared to work. -- Anatol Holt

Working...