Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Japan

Japan Restricts Chipmaking Equipment Exports as It Aligns With US China Curbs (reuters.com) 12

Japan said on Friday it will restrict exports of 23 types of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, aligning its technology trade controls with a U.S. push to curb China's ability to make advanced chips. From a report: Japan, home to major chip equipment makers such as Nikon and Tokyo Electron, did not specify China as the target of the restrictions, saying manufacturers would need to seek export permission for all regions. "We are fulfilling our responsibility as a technological nation to contribute to international peace and stability," Minister for Economy, Trade and Industry Yasutoshi Nishimura told a news conference. Japan wants to stop its advanced technology being used for military purposes and does not have a specific country in mind, he said. But the decision, coming ahead of a weekend visit to Beijing by Japanese Minister for Foreign Affairs Yoshimasa Hayashi, will be seen as a major win for the U.S., which in October announced sweeping restrictions on access to chipmaking technology to slow China's technological and military advances.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Japan Restricts Chipmaking Equipment Exports as It Aligns With US China Curbs

Comments Filter:
  • Until Europe joins the embargo. There is a lot of tech from Europe involved in chip making. Those guys are the photolithography equipment 800lb gorilla in that space.
      • by shanen ( 462549 )

        Not a bad FP branch, though I don't know about your premise. The real threat is that China develops local capabilities and this is just one more motivational factor from that perspective.

        For what it is worth, the story did get a lot of coverage on NHK today. Extremely shallow coverage, I'm sad to report.

        It should be remembered that many Chinese people have a long view of things. The "normal state of the world" is for China to be the leading, even top, civilization. China just went through a couple of bad ce

        • Premise is only that Europe is on board or getting onboard with the semiconductor sanctions and restrictions on China, which now with Japan makes a pretty solid line of "western" technology nations versus China.

          And yes, the risk is China developing local capabilities but I think the thought process is China is just doing that anyway so just letting them have all the tech is just making their lives easier? Now what that really depends on is how you view the Xi/CCP regime. If you think it's dangerous for any

          • by shanen ( 462549 )

            Not clear to me if your interpretation of the premise matches OP's, but that's the direction I was trying to tilt.

            However, as regards your last paragraph, I think there are two major reasons. (1) Number of engineers, and (2) China's relative lack of religious BS baggage and broader lack of general anti-scientific elements running amok. (Perhaps a local problem in America?) And you didn't mention India. That's a country that has potential to compete on (1), but there's also the strong likelihood that China i

  • This seems like it is at best a short term solution. If/when countries have tries this, other countries decide more needs to be done "in-house". China is doing that now and if/when they get more advanced, they too will restrict the flow of their new tech artificially slowing mankind's advancements for no real reason.

    It's a shame we can't see past all that and work together more. We are all still human. And we have one world to live on together.

    • When one country limits their economy for the humanities like restricting child labor, forced labor camps, and environmental concerns (whether justified or not) and another country undercuts them with the use of child or forced labor and throws caution to whatever is blowing in the wind that day, there needs to be a stabilizing force to in essence coerce one economy to play by the rules of another. Otherwise the prudent thing is for one economy to refuse to trade with the other. This also rings true of inte
    • This seems like it is at best a short term solution. If/when countries have tries this, other countries decide more needs to be done "in-house". China is doing that now and if/when they get more advanced, they too will restrict the flow of their new tech artificially slowing mankind's advancements for no real reason.

      It's a shame we can't see past all that and work together more. We are all still human. And we have one world to live on together.

      The US, tech powerhouse that it is, still can't replicate what the Dutch and Japanese have done. It's doubtful that the Chinese can do what the US has been unable to do, especially over the next few years. Well, at least absent industrial espionage. If developing this advanced technology were that easy, i.e., if it were simply a matter of money and manpower, then the US would have poured the necessary money into sidelining the Dutch and Japanese and dominating all aspects of global chipmaking. That the

      • "Chipmaking equipment manufacturing is far more complex, and it would be an unimaginable surprise to see the Chinese conquer that challenge by themselves, again absent industrial espionage."

        So the Dutch and Japanese could figure it out, but the Chinese with the advantage of knowing what can be done, reverse engineering, etc. would be "an unimaginable surprise" to figure it out?

  • Many of us graybeards remember decades when every western news broadcast and daily newspaper had prominent statements from the US trade representative (or similar) about the importance of this or that country opening up to "free trade." When I first read Orwell's 1984, I was incredulous that common news topics and general beliefs could be manipulated so thoroughly, without anyone noticing or objecting. This has proved to be mostly true. "We have always been at war with Eastasia".

"An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H.L. Mencken

Working...