End of an Era: Forum 2000 Closes 77
Ex Machina writes: "After nearly 4 years on the net, the great artificial intelligence project Forum 2000 has closed. For the uninitiated, Forum 2000's artificial intelligence constructs -- the SOMADS (who ranged from Tux the Penguin to Einstein) -- answered questions from 'drones' on the Internet. It is being reported on at: Fake Forum, True Meaning of Life, and Conversatron."
Damn Formless Void (Score:4)
Forum was so well written, one got the impression of almost a tailor-made cartoon strip. SOMADS (personas) were always creative, and the answers were sometimes helpful.
All of this was done, from my understanding, by a group of bored college students. If Forum2000 displayed the wisdom of the average college student, then the future of the world has nothing to worry about. I really will miss the wit and wisdom that was dispensed through the cold and heartless system which is the Internet.
Farewell, Forum, and good luck to its creators in whatever line of work they plan on persuing in the future.
Re:Artificial intelligence (Score:2)
"Using OSS defies Reason"
Ahh, the memories. (Score:1)
And do read the Hall of Fame [forum2000.org] before it goes away.
Re:Artificial intelligence (Score:3)
Well, I'm surprised that nobody's tried to create a SOMAD/Slashbot yet. It wouldn't be too hard to do one that could do the following:
et cetera.
Oh. Never mind, then.
Faking it (Score:2)
How Forum2000 Works (Score:1)
Corey's Last Request (Score:1)
[ simulated persona = "Corey Kosak", node #116, max search depth 32%, neural variance 19.664 ]
All I have ever wanted is to get a GIF of the shaved ass of spicy Latino Gnome hottie Miguel de Icaza.
Re:Gone, but for good? (Score:1)
Gone, but for good? (Score:3)
And I must say, the timing of this story was excellent. Had this been posted during a weekday, our humble internet connection would surely have perished.
Good luck Corey and Andrej! No hard feelings, I hope.
Conversatron High Command
Digital Magic 8 ball (Score:1)
I've got an advanced digital version of the magic 8 ball working called GAC. [mindpixel.com] Give it a try. It really thinks it's human. You can ask it things like:
I am working on bringing back all of the F2K personae, but this time, they will be real.
Is the Forum2000 a hoax? (Score:1)
It is in a comment the Einstein persona makes:
"My point is that you do not fully understand the notion of time, and it is no wonder that your mind, set to analyze everything into indivisible untis, cannot conceive of time as a geometric notion, just another dimension of the space-time manifold.
The 'Einstein SOMAD' incorrectly spells the words 'units' as 'untis'. There are more spelling errors if you care to take the time to look for them.
This leads me to question the fact that the Forum2000 is really a front end to an artificial intelligence computer. I have this creeping suspicion that human beings really type the answers to people's questions. The only real 'artificial intelligence' is the Cube. Have you noticed how when you ask a question, the Cube has a meaningless answer right away, whereas the other personas take hours or days to reply? It may be true that the Matrix needs that much time to come up with replies, but if it makes spelling mistakes (which a computer program at the level that the Forum2000 is purported to be should not make) AND takes forever to generate replies, in my mind can only mean that human beings come up with the answers.
Possibly the reason the Forum2000 got shut down is because everyone started running out of ideas for funny conversations between the SOMADs, or that the people running it are graduating from university and will not have time to keep it up? The oldest questions in the Hall of Fame [forum2000.org] are around 1200 days old, which is roughly four years, the time needed to complete university.
There are other issues, such as the fact that the SOMADs can change the font attributes of the text of their replies, and on rare occasions generate images to prove their points. But maybe they know HTML.
Of course, you could argue that the spelling mistakes are intentionally programmed into the Forum2000.
What do you think?
--Markus
BlackholeTV [blackholetv.com] - TV that Swallows
Re:Faking it (Score:2)
Too bad you can't use it. (Score:1)
The requested URL
You might consider fixing that.
----------------------------
Re:Is the Forum2000 a hoax? (Score:2)
"Hello? What part of trained on Usenet don't you understand?"
That said, it was, of course. a hoax... though an extemely entertaining one.
Garg
Re:With all Due Respect..... (Score:2)
Steven E. Ehrbar
Re:amusingly (Score:2)
This is not true. Yes, there is a 'real' peterb. Yes, I am he. Yes, the Forum 2000 SOMAD was based on me (or more accurately, on the entire output of my usenet postings and postings to internal CMU bulletin boards over 10 years ago). But that does not accurately reflect who I am, or what I do. The guys at Intelleq thought it would be cute to use my reviews as input to the matrix, and I agreed, but that's about the extent of it.
And while I happen to think Debbie Does Dallas is a fine movie, pornography is certainly not the only thing -- or even the majority of -- the so rts of movies I review [themestream.com].
While on the one hand the notoriety has been great, it's really kind of irritating when the SOMAD acts like a sex pig in public and then I get email from some strange woman wanting to know why I said those awful things to her. Trust me. Notoriety is overrated.
Re:amusingly (Score:1)
Hull breach (and, unfortunately, proof) (Score:1)
There's an amusing story about the time the MIT and CMU zephyr servers got linked up. Because of the different ways MIT and CMU use zephyr, all of the hardcore MIT zephyr-types immediately started seeing all of the sekrit forum2k zephyr discussion about how the questions were going to be answered, etc.
We Were Amused(tm).
The forum crowd proceeded to clue up (apparently after some paniced zephyrs to the class, though I don't have logs myself) and move their discussion somewhere a little less public.
Oh yeah, and for those of you who have never set foot at MIT or CMU, zephyr is the great-granddaddy of all chat/instant message systems, developed Way Back When for MIT's Project Athena (the same initiative that brought you things like X Windows and Kerberos.)
Re:What was this? (Score:1)
I heard about this thing about an hour ago. I am not completely sure whether or not it is fake, but I believe it is. First, he claims he could not maintain funding because his investors said it wouldn't pay off. There are millions of dollars invested in natural language processing. If this actually worked, we would probably be using SOMADS in our computers now, paying a monthly fee to intelleq(I think that's what his investor was called.)
Second, his paper appears to be entirely based on breaking down sentances and deriving meaning. He mentions nothing about image recognition, but on at least one occasion it shows his persona giving proofs about triangles with pictures demonstrating them in the hall of fame. If their primary information source is the text of newsgroups, these personas should be unable to tell what a picture is of. It might be able to assume the images content through contextual clues, but could not guarantee the content of the image was what they expected. Also it would take another step in programming to let the persona know that pictures can be used to clarify a concept. It doesn't seem to be covered in his paper.
It is also unlikely that a program that got all it's information from newsgroups would be able to tell what was funny and what was not based on sentance structure. I guess it is possible, but I doubt anyone has a clue on how to implement it.
Also, at one point, a new persona (Trinity) is appearantly created during a conversation by another persona. It would probably be fairly dangerous to give personas access to your database to personas, which, in tbe process of learning, could spawn hundreds of senseless personas.
There are probably work-arounds for most, if not all, of the things I said, but I don't think anyone is good enough to do them at this time.
When it is revealed to be real I will be very embarrassed, so I'm hoping it's fake.
Just what is a Finite State Machine, then? (Score:2)
I remember seeing a network TV magazine show (20/20 or Hard Copy or whatever those interchangeable network TV magazine shows are) about a guy who was told by his doctor to stop watching Seinfeld because this guy would laugh so hard it was messing him up. Hmmmm, I think I may have chuckled at Seinfeld a couple of times. I think I found f2k as hilarious as this guy must've found Seinfeld.
The ultimate for me was definately "What is a Finite State Machine?" It's in the hall of fame...it should be required reading for every programmer.
All good things...
Re:Artificial intelligence (Score:1)
Re:What was this? (Score:1)
Re:Doesnt anyone ever explain (Score:1)
Re:Artificial intelligence (Score:1)
Ryan
Re:Faking it (Score:1)
Also, look at "Portal" sites. They all grew out of Web search engines -- but their business success has nothing to do with the quality of their search technology. The biggest winner of all is Yahoo, which is hardly an example of cutting-edge technology.
Re:Too bad you can't use it. (Score:1)
nooooooo!!!!! (Score:2)
Re:Just what is a Finite State Machine, then? (Score:2)
Agreed... any post with Barbie in it was a great one...
Thinking hurts, let's go shopping!
Re:With all Due Respect..... (Score:1)
A few simple questions:
Honestly, from the perspective of most of us, we can niether know hwether it was or was not a hoax, but mearly look at what we are told, hope it is accurate, and use our best judgement to try to weed-out false information and choose between conflicting reports. (Some demostratably working code, however, would argue against a hoax.) The Forum certainly has the "ring of truth" -- i.e., it looks realistic. However (1) it is admittedly fun to believe, and (2) your claims sound believable. So, if it is worth telling us about, do you have any evidence?
(I hope that Forum 2000 will see the accusation, and put a confirmation or denail statement on their web-site.)
Re:nooooooo!!!!! (Score:2)
Re:The sad state of AI (Score:1)
This was a fascinating project. It was, of course, also hliarious. However, I think there are more important things than just the humor value. Seening the way it could or could not answer questions reasonable was fascinating, as were the times it could or couldn't keep the replies geared toward human (vs. machine readers) and the ways it would sometimes break down.
I, for one, have several question types that I think would have been cool to see ask. These include:
Questions involving implicit reasoning and problem solving, such as found in the book Five Minute Misteries. Specifically, things that involve looking at evidence, picking up on the right cues, and making a good educated guess rather than a straight logic puzzel or general oppinion / generalization question.
Questions involving inferring based on comparisson, particularly judging whether or not two web-page whose authors have the same first name prominently displayed are by the same person. (Ayn might say "A is A" though the name be similar by coincidence alone.)
Questions on more divers topics (and reviews of web pages on such topics). For example, mythology, medicine, art displays, human-based gaming, and so forth, to see a larger variety of responces. While questions on interpersonal relationships and such were both very amusing and informative of errors, it was also quickly obvious that these algorithms couldn't answer these in a way resemble human understanding. I would be incredible to look at the responces for some other such things.
The ability of these SOMADs to sometimes give intelligent sounding and useful answers to non-personal problems certainly the most interesting. (E.g., Shakespears detailled historical explanation of the origin of the word "pants," Rand and Einstein's debate over relativity, the times when some SOMADs actually wrote short but coherence and quasi-intelligent sounding essays, etc....) There ability to insult and wisecrack at some questions was also interesting.
This obviously has a lot of potential. First it has obvious entertainment value, especially when unusual or socio-emotional questions are asked. Secondly, being able to use such algorithms to add a "pannel of experts" feature to more serious softwares (notably, encyclopedeas and other reffence apps) or to be able to feed it a other source a drive (or use web access) would be great. Such a system could be used to search and get to useful information, summeries and discuss it, and give link to the sources used, could be very handy. (Such a system could also be entertaining, if off-the-wall questions were fed to it for fun.) Of course, user judgement would be required.
It is truly sad that this project is going down. It was obviously more than your typical A.L.I.C.E.-type "chatter-bot." The simulation of some actual reasoning and inferrence finding was amazing. This was not artificial intelligence like the common chatter-bot, but appeared to have some real artificial intelligence.
If Forum 2000 is going down, then they have nothing to loose with GPL'ing it along with a HOWTO and a tutorial on the theories embodied. (What better way to keep the algoriths running than to let them proliferate, much as "a seed must fall to the ground and die [sic]" to yield a good harvest.) This is a sad day in the history of AI, but this could also be a good time for SOMADs technology to to take steps toward growth and and spread to a larger and more diverse teem of developers and researchers.
GPL Definitely (Score:1)
If Forum 2000 is going to be no-more, they really ought to release their algorithms. They will not be loosing anyting, after all. Prefferably, technical and theoretical explanations for the algorthms, the code used to prefform the algoriths, and perhaps a practical HOWTO and theoretical (non-technical, warm-up) primer. I know that is a lot ask for, but is would be great; simply releasing the code would do. GPL, I think would be an ideal liscense.
Of course, I'm not sure how well this would work on a since PC -- the processing demands, I suspect, would be outrageous (based both on the results and the number of nodes). However, this would really be "neet" to have, and may have some very significant practical uses.
Wow... (Score:1)
I guess the big question now is whether any other sites going to be carrying on Forum2000's memory. We recently saw ION Storm pick up the defunct Thief series to continue; would something like that ever happen to the Forum2000 project? It would certainly be a waste to have all this research and development vanish into nothing.
Okay, "open sourcing" Iridium didn't made a lot of sense, but Forum2000 sounds like the perfect project to open source. If the creators aren't interested in carrying it on anymore, why not like other members of the community carry on the torch? Guess this will end up being yet another example of how open sourcing a project could have saved it.
Your submission has been rejected!! (Score:1)
Gay Ken (Score:1)
Oh well... (Score:1)
Question: Are you better then Forum 2000's AI?
The soul says: Can we change the subject please.
Hall of Fame (Score:2)
Re:Gone, but for good? (Score:1)
Main Entry: kudo
Pronunciation: 'kü-(")dO, 'kyü-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural kudos
Etymology: back-formation from kudos (taken as a plural)
Date: 1926
1 : AWARD, HONOR
2 : COMPLIMENT, PRAISE
usage Some commentators hold that since kudos is a singular word it cannot be used as a plural and that the word kudo is impossible. But kudo does exist; it is simply one of the most recent words created by back-formation from another word misunderstood as a plural. Kudos was introduced into English in the 19th century; it was used in contexts where a reader unfamiliar with Greek could not be sure whether it was singular or plural. By the 1920s it began to appear as a plural, and about 25 years later kudo began to appear. It may have begun as a misunderstanding, but then so did cherry and pea.
Re:Your submission has been rejected!! (Score:1)
Re:nooooooo!!!!! (Score:1)
The real meaning? (Score:2)
adamp@andrew.cmu.edu
Re:Oh well... (Score:1)
Re:The real meaning? (Score:1)
The sad state of AI (Score:2)
With all Due Respect..... (Score:1)
The questions posted on Forum2000 are all piped to the Carnegie Mellon CS-side Forum2000 Zephyr Class. The Questions are then answered by bored CS Grad students and other miscellaneous Geeks, who assume personalities to fit their response. Kosh, for example, is usually played by the Printer Guy at CluServ here.
Still, I will admit that this project deserves recognition for one of the biggest Net-Hoaxes ever performed. Cheers to CMU!
What was it? (Score:1)
Have some respect for the dead for god sake! (Score:2)
(from the current running personae on the Forum)
[ simulated persona = "Corey Kosak", node #28, max search depth 63%, neural variance 14.571 ]
Jesus fucking Christ we're getting Slashdotted again
[ simulated persona = "Corey Kosak", node #54, max search depth 50%, neural variance 27.972 ]
This is NOT how I wanted to spend my final few minutes before death
-Earthling
Doesnt anyone ever explain (Score:1)
Often wrong but never in doubt.
I am Jack9.
GPL it? (Score:1)
- A.P.
--
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad
Re:no! (Score:2)
Re:Your submission has been rejected!! (Score:1)
--Siva the lost
Keyboard not found.
Gotcha, Corey (Score:1)
Your blatant misspelling of "this merely provides a" has tainted the Matrix and your question is therefore REJECTED!
Re:What was this? (Score:1)
Re:Requiem (Score:1)
I need to be held.
[ simulated persona = "quonsar", node #613, max search depth 69%, neural variance 274.561 ]
Perhaps Mr. Kosak will place his hand in your crotch.
"I will gladly pay you today, sir, and eat up
Re:amusingly (Score:1)
So many conflicting reports, who to believe?
Re:I know you're a troll, but this a bad attempt (Score:2)
Why do you simply assume anyone who thinks this is "troll"? The site is more than well enough done to give people not familiar with it the impression that it is real (the incongruent stuff actually enhances this effect to a degree). Further, the story doesn't say a thing about it being a humor site, and at least as many replies to the story say its real as that its a hoax. In other words, it is a perfectly understandable that those not familiar with Forum 2000 might think it was real (even for a lot of them). Just because you know its a joke doesn't mean everyone else does.
It seems to me that some people are being a bit paranoid (and harsh to say the least) in assuming anyone who thinks the Forum was real is a "troll." Even a very bad troll could come up with something better than that. Methinks a lot of thoughtless folk are flaming nieve innocents, and jumping to unfounded conclusions about "trolls." (Ignorant != troll, troll != gulible.)
Re:With all Due Respect..... (Score:1)
Way to any unanswered questions to leave a trace belief in my mind.
However, if this is a hoax - The largest congatulations to those who implemented it. A grand feat of mischievious trickery and fun!
Re:The real meaning? (Score:1)
--
Re:What was this? (Score:1)
Re:Gone, but for good? (Score:1)
Re:The sad state of AI (Score:2)
Garg
Re:With all Due Respect..... (Score:2)
Requiem (Score:1)
"I've underestimated you, Misters Kosak and Bauer!"
The world is diminished by its passing. Thus, A is A. *sniff*
Damn, this is like Slashdot closing. I need to be held.
If it closed... (Score:1)
What was this? (Score:1)
Re:With all Due Respect..... (Score:1)
Brutal... your statement does not even approach humour.
I cannot believe that people would waste their time on something as inconsequential as forum2000. Pathetic.
unix may suck, but... (Score:2)
All I have ever wanted is to get a GIF of the shaved ass of spicy Latino Gnome hottie Miguel de Icaza.
Re:Doesnt anyone ever explain (Score:2)
The slashdot effect is a nice way to kill off web site, as well, but I don't think that gets classified as 'good'.....
enjoy
Re:How Forum2000 Works (Score:3)
Assuming that this isn't just smokescreen to conceal the hoax, it seems to be pretty good, if brief, background on how Forum2000 works.
If you bought into that load of obfuscated technomumble, you must feel right at home on AOL. :-)
And if you had actually read Andrej's page instead of the how it works page, you'd have noted that Forum2000 is listed in the 'entertainment' category (as opposed to his 'work' links...)
"I will gladly pay you today, sir, and eat up
Rats! (Score:2)
The Forum was one of the great advocates of the Unlambda [eleves.ens.fr] programming language I invented. The Matrix's program, initially written in C++, had been entirely rewritten in Unlambda for efficiency and clarity. Now what will I do without this precious illustration of the power of that programming language?
Not to mention how useful the Forum's advice was (though it must be said that The Cube was the most sensible and reasonable SOMAD, the rest being, well, a bit artificial in their manner of speech), and how cute Andrej looks - ahem, well, I'd better be going.
Re:Faking it (Score:2)
At first I thought that this again was a hoax, or that perhaps the knowledge tree was so carefully defined that it couldn't really be intelligent. So, seeing as it's knowledge tree is pretty much geography orientated, I'd thought I would try and trip it up. If you ask what the capital of Holland is, it correctly identifies that Amsterdam is indeed the capital of the Netherlands. A subtle, but valuable trick.
The real info on how all this works is given here [mit.edu] by way of a paper written by Boris Katz. No, BORIS Katz.
Read, enjoy, realise that f2k could be a reality seeing as the cpu cycles are there. Oh and if you're really interested in "chatterbots" from a semi-academic point of view, I'd reccomend highly Simon Laven's homepage [toptown.com] which links to several sites discussing bots from Eliza to the John Lennon Aritifical Intelligence Project. It doesn't however cover the f2k and meaningoflife.com type of bots (perhaps because they're fake?
Re:Faking it (Score:2)
Since START seems to have a lot of geographical "knowledge", I tried the following queries, all of which failed. We have a LONG, LONG way to go.
What did Ankara used to be called?
What is the name of the English town from which New York takes its name?
What is your favorite country?
Which countries share a border with Poland?
Of which country is Clinton president?
Disillusioned (Score:1)
wasn't really an Oracle either?
And that Santa Claus is really a irc bot gone
horribly wrong?
And that there are no dogs on the internet?
And that Al Gore did invent the internet?
Re:Artificial intelligence (Score:1)
This would work really well with all of the long-running oft-revisited debates (e.g. anything about Napster, the RIAA, DeCSS, Microsoft all have the same 4 comments explanations of what's going on and why this is "bigger than it seems", why this judge or that judge doesn't know what he's doing, why the microsoft breakup is good/bad/unimportant to linux, etc. )...
With a bit of tweeking (say, ignoring articles that don't seem related to each other through some heuristic) you could probably get a fairly good karma-whoring success ratio out of this.
Too bad I don't feel like it.
Re:The real meaning? (Score:2)
no! (Score:4)
Artificial intelligence (Score:3)