An Interview with JRR Tolkien and Other Tomfoolery 104
Lord of the Links writes: "These wackjobs pretend to interview JRR Tolkien with a ouija board as well as slapping together other nonsense, like photoshopped Ringwraiths from the movie doing bizarre things. I laughed once or twice, especially the diary by Gollum. The girls side left something to be desired, but the script revisions were kinda funny. If you feel like feeding into the Lord of the Rings hype, check it out."
Maybe he'd do an interview for slashdot... (Score:2, Funny)
JRR: Crazy Web folk...
About the movie... (Score:4, Interesting)
I wonder how they're going to deal with the transition between the first two books (at the end of the first movie.)
I had a mild feeling of resolution at the end of the first book, but it felt a little more like a pause in the tension, not an end of it.
When it comes to a movie, however, we'll have to see if they gimmick it up to make it more bite-sized.
Re:About the movie... (Score:5, Informative)
I mean i understand them having to leave him out for the sake of time, etc, but without the scene from the barrow downs, where does Merry get his sword from? That sword is important later in the 3rd book where he uses it to kill the leader of the Ringwraiths... That's what i'm worried about... Tolkien's writing was so interwoven that everything tied in with something else.
~z
Re:About the movie... (Score:1)
Re:About the movie... (Score:1)
However, I hear that the scene where the Fellowship is given their cloaks will be included on the DVD.
Re:About the movie... (Score:3, Informative)
This movie has always been an interpretation of the books, one man's point of view. As far as I'm concerned, the only things that will ever do the books justice ARE the books. I feel bad for the folks who havent read the books and are going to see the films...
Re:About the movie... (Score:2, Interesting)
My friend, who hasn't read the books, found the ending to be a very much of a cliffhanger and he couldn't wait to find out what would happen next.
Re:About the movie... (Score:1, Informative)
again, I don't think the shifting material is a problem.
In the introduction (this is the Houghton-Mifflin 50th Anniversary version)
that the story is one book, and the three volumes were
published separately for convenience. Tolkein actually had it
planned out as six books at one point.
Re:About the movie... (Score:1)
Why make it up? (Score:5, Informative)
Plenty of people claim to know what he thinks [bbc.co.uk] about the file.
Peter Jackson reckons he'd like it.
JRR's biographer reckons he'd have ignored it.
His son, Christopher Tolkien reckons he'd have hated it.
So there you have it
"phtoshopped" (Score:5, Interesting)
Is "photoshop" falling into common usage as a word meaning "to digitally modify [an image]" similar to the way "xerox" is now synonymous with "photocopy"? (Even if you're using, say, a Canon copier.)
Personally I'd rather hear them referred to as "gimped Ringwraiths".
TheFrood
Re:"phtoshopped" (Score:2, Insightful)
Indeed. This usage has existed for a good 5 years, anyway.
Personally I'd rather hear them referred to as "gimped Ringwraiths".
If I heard "gimped Ringwraiths", my first thought would be of Ringwraiths who'd had their ankles broken, or perhaps had had polio as children.
Anyway, "gimped" won't be replacing "photoshopped" any time soon. Gimp will have to break out of the Open Source ghetto first, and I don't see that happening. The serious graphics professional accepts no imitation for Photoshp. Period.
Re:"phtoshopped" (Score:2, Funny)
(emphasis added)
Except, of course, Photoshop.
Re:"phtoshopped" (Score:1)
All your base are belong to GIMP (Score:1)
Is "photoshop" falling into common usage as a word meaning "to digitally modify [an image]" similar to the way "xerox" is now synonymous with "photocopy"?
This has been true at least since the All Your Base photoshopping craze [google.com]. Read More: A Google search for "photoshopped" [google.com]
Yes, I say "gimped" instead.
Re:"phtoshopped" (Score:1)
Especially when they actually are using GIMP [gimp.org] in the film industry =)
"Rig and wire removal..." hmm, maybe Matrix postproduction folks could try this =)
Not at all. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Not at all. (Score:2)
Re:Not at all. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Not at all. (Score:1)
My personal guess is that if he got to see the joy and excitement the film is inevitably going to spread to kids and adults alike, he would feel it is a good thing. Of course he would still grumble about characters and plot details lost - all writers do.
Re:Hah! (Score:3, Interesting)
All in all the whole "Tolkien as a web-saavy ghost" schtick was pretty funny, and definitely worth the link.
Re:Hah! (Score:1)
Re:Hah! (Score:4, Insightful)
It depends on what their names are.
Re:Hah! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I know what I call them (Score:2)
Re:I know what I call them (Score:2)
Re:Hah! (Score:3, Insightful)
Trouble with adding "token blacks" is that LotR is set in a medieval-type world. So there's not going to be a multi-ethnic Shire, any more than Britain in the Middle Ages was. The only way to cover this would be to make one of the major tribes black - elves, Riders of Rohan, whatever. But then note that black skin serves the single purpose of protection against sun, and the whole of LotR takes place in a cold-temperate area. For the sequel "Sauron does Africa", blacks certainly would feature. But for LotR, the only place they appear is amongst Sauron's crew (the Haradrim, IIRC).
Grab.
Re:The actual LOTR ring (Score:1)
I have a better idea (Score:1)
If a real interview did occur... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:If a real interview did occur... (Score:1)
Tolkien was a genocidal maniac (PC LOTR) (Score:5, Funny)
Sincerely,
Gorbag,
The Orc Liberation Front
Re:Tolkien was a genocidal maniac (PC LOTR) (Score:2, Funny)
vicious in-fighting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H winners.
They're not wackjobs... (Score:1)
Wait a second....
Re:Avoid LOTR -- it is RACIST (Score:1, Insightful)
All stories have baddies that can be distinguished in someway from the protagonist. It's human nature, not racism. Racism is when this is taken to extremes.
Sounds like Screwtape is up to his usual tricks?! (Score:1, Insightful)
Good Tolkein Books (Score:3, Insightful)
The Inklings
and
The Personal Letters of J.R.R. Tolkein
both by Humphrey Carpenter. I read Inklings this summer and found it fascinating (includes stuff about C.S. Lewis and Charles Williams, too). Letters is a bit harder to plow through, but good sampling reading.
Incidentally, anyone know when those animated "Hobbit" and LOTR films were made? (late 70's? Early 80's?) I'll bet people had some bad things to say about those. I remember orcs singing cheesy songs like "Where there's a whip ! There's a way !"
Re:Good Tolkein Books (Score:1)
Ralph Bakshi's [ralphbakshi.com] rotoscoped "The Lord of the Rings" [msn.com] (which covered "Fellowship..." and the first half of "The Two Towers") came out in 1978; the same year as Rankin-Bass' [rankinbass.com] made-for-TV version of "The Hobbit." Finally, "The Return of the King" (also made by Rankin-Bass) came out in 1980
that was terrible (Score:3, Insightful)
Hype? (Score:4, Insightful)
George Lucas promised to film the prequels back to back and release one each year for three years. What's fat minivan dad up to now? Five years until he does another prequel? What? Lucas doesn't want to produce a piece of shit and needs to take his time creating special effects and developing plot which still falls far short? Effects in TPM were no better than what was seen in Harry Potter, the plot was non-existent despite Lucas' PR making spoof posters of "Plot Does Matter". Peter Jackson has created an awe inspiring movie with a richly textured plot which effectively conveys themes of friendship and sacrifice incorporating fantastic visuals and effects which enhance the movie without taking center stage or obviously being computer generated.
Lord of the Rings is news for nerds, whether on film or paper, and it still doesn't have a topic devoted entirely to this phenomenon. Lord of the Rings is highly deserving of this, and in light of 1999, moreso than Star Wars.
LotR (Score:1)
Boycott the MPAA! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Boycott the MPAA! (Score:2)
Okay - this *is* on topic because a movie story is the only place this thread makes sense.
I'm just going to point out that I *will* gladly boycott the MPAA... but not WETA, Peter Jackson (whise "Meet the Feebles" is great), Iam Holm, Cate Blanchett or even that windbag (gotta love 'im) Ian McKellen. I am *not* a studio, and thus I cannot boycott the MPAA. I *am* a musician with one album from a prior band - my next one (which is admittadly an "if" prospect) will *not* be associated with the RIAA, but I will continue to buy albums... I like James Taylor, and I'll pay him... I like Lords of Acid, and I'll pay them. I know that some (even a good chunk) is going to a orginization that I think is neigh organized crime, but it's their problem, and they are bound in contracts. Same for movies - I have an even worse view of the MPAA, since I've followed and read the actual subpoenas of Valenti vs. 2600 and read transcripts of several interviews. They guy really is both a prick and a crimelord operating just on the inside of the law, quite possibly by buying the law.
But that dosen't mean I won't support Peter Jackson and his cast and crew's effort to bring one of my favorite books to screen. I know that part of that ticket is going to a crappy originization... hell, for all I know, one of the actors is a Scientologist (a group that I personally abhor) and will tithe some of his income, but that does not mean that the work as a whole is not to be supported.
--
Evan
OT: Boromir casting (Score:2, Insightful)
Well, having just finished reading Two Towers, I'd like to point out that Boromir himself was jealous of Aragorn's status.
The casting seems appropriate then, doesn't it?
damn pop-ups (Score:2)
How many time do I need to tell them I don't want to go to tas vegas.
Re:damn pop-ups (Score:1)