What Computer Speakers Do You Use? 71
karnal asks: "Since we all listen to a lot of music (who doesn't), I wondered if anyone could help me on this. I've been looking to buy a new speaker system, after growing tired of my current setup. I've recently bought the Turtle Beach Santa Cruz and I'm looking for a good set of speakers. Should I go the 4.1 route? Personally, I think I'd be happy with 2.1. I'm looking for low noise, decent power, and excellent sound quality. I've looked at the VideoLogic Sirocco Crossfire, but at 449$ a set, I wouldn't want to be dissappointed. Anyone test any outstanding speakers lately?"
Why? (Score:5, Informative)
This is the best way (IMO) to get decent sound, and of course, this gives you things like radio, tape decks, equalizer and whatever else you want to add to it. Add a subwoofer to that. Heck - you can do surround sound if you want it (assuming your program supports it).
disclaimer: this is what I have done and it's worked well for me for years. When I heard the improvement for the first time, there was no going back. Thus - I have absolutely no idea how good today's higher-end computer speakers sound
Re:Why? (Score:1)
So, I figure I have a few options: One, try to get everything on the same ground. This would be nearly impossible, since my computer is running through the UPS, and I don't have access to my cable company's grounding. Second, buy a more expensive ground loop isolator. Third, get a sound card with a digital out and an amp that has a digital in.
If the original poster goes with the amp, instead of speakers, I recommend looking at amps with digital inputs. The info pages on his sound card says it has a digital output.
Re:Why? (Score:1)
Re:Why? (Score:1)
Not to mention the @ work situation, where I don't have my home stereo @ my disposal.
Just a couple reasons why computer speakers are sometimes useful...
And, to answer the question that was posed, I'm fairly happy with the speakers I have @ work, Altec Lansing ADA885, but I wouldn't recommend them, simply because they are too expensive for what they are... and they do funky things sometimes. But Altec lansing does make some fairly good speakers... I've had a wide variety over the years on different work machines, and they've always seemed ok.
Re:Why? (Score:1)
Get studio montiors! Great sound and they look great.
Take a look at the yorkville YSM-1p's.
www.yorkville.com
Re:Why? (Score:1)
As for my soundcard, I am still using the EISA SoundBlaster 16 card that came with my 486 6-7 years ago. For music listening, there is nothing wrong with it, and I'm sure they are very cheap these days. And Linux support for it is seamless.
Bookshelf speakers (Score:1)
These are the only computer speakers I would recommend:
Swans M200 multimedia speakers for $300:
http://www.av123.com/divaproducts.html
These are real bookshelf speakers with 5" woofers and soft dome tweeter (easier on your ears). The frequency response is 55Hz-18kHz which means they have enough bass as to not require a bass module.
Another option that you should consider is getting a small stereo - non amplified speakers, and a small integrated amplifier or stereo reciever. This opens up a lot more possibilities.
Well.. (Score:2)
My personal advice goes along these lines:
First, 4.1 speakers are only good for games and merely OK for DVDs. Eventually, DVD-Audio/SACD/something else will make 5.1 sound for the masses possible. Right now, unless you are going to be doing gaming, just get a 2.1 setup. 4.1 doesn't have the center channel required for a proper DVD movie experience.
Second, there are advantages to properly constructed computer speakers. Generally computer speakers won't mess with your monitor if they are placed right up against it. They also tend to be nice and compact.
Third, there are great price and performance advantages to using non-computer speakers. A good audio setup will be weighted with a flatter, more realistic frequency response and work especially well with music. And they are generally more boom-for-the-buck then the high-end computer speakers. You often-times get 5.1 out of them, instead of 4.1. This can be a good thing, especially if you can get everything to work together, because you can get the center channel along with the 4 corner speakers. You need at least three speakers in front of you, preferebly five, to be able to accurately position sounds.
Fourth, both cheap stereo equipment and most computer speakers are heavily tuned for specific sounds. They give you thudding bass sounds so that you feel like you are getting your money's worth, but, once you get past that, have a really crappy sound. And they'll say they have a 15Hz-30KHz or better frequency range, with 200 Watts of power, when you really are getting about 20-30 watts of power, with great response and clarity in the 15Hz-1KHz range, and muddy the rest of the way.
If you are really wanting to blow some money, go to a musical instrument store and pick up a set of studio monitors. You will pay $500-1500, or maybe even more, but they will have a crystal-clear, completely flat, frequency response across the entire audible range. In today's computer-centric studios, they even make shielded monitors that won't mess up your monitors.
Best bet, get a good quality walkman and a CD with some music you like. Then run it through the various speaker systems in the store. Your ears will tell you what you should purchase. If you can't tell the difference between an $80 set and a $120 set, get the $80 set. It's probably the only way to do things.
Re:Well.. (Score:2)
"You need at least three speakers in front of you, preferably five, to be able to accurately position sounds." Hmm... I don't think so. Go listen to some Maggies [magnepan.com] at your local high-end hi-fi store. Two speakers will image far better than any 5.1 speaker setup costing anywhere near their price. They're beautiful. Imaging has a *lot* to do with phase, and most speakers put a filter smack dab in the middle of our most sensitive hearing range (we are most sensitive to 1kHz-3kHz, and most speakers put a filter at ~2kHz). With the exception of first order filters (which have tons of problems in their own right, and are rarely used), filters screw up phase horribly.
"...they'll say they have 15Hz-30kHz or better frequency range". I assume you mean amplifiers will be rated this way. Speakers will never be rated this good. Not even $70,000 speakers. Yes, computer speakers will exagerate claims. But not this great. Most computer speakers have a -3dB (half perceived volume) point of around 80Hz. A decent $1000+ pair of speakers will have a -3dB point of around 50Hz. Both will usually quote the -60dB point, which is around 60Hz and 35Hz accordingly. Most subwoofers will hit their -60dB point around 25-30Hz. Some extraordinary woofers will push that down below 20Hz. But that's very rare. However, most computer speakers will focus on the 100Hz-2kHz region. Most people perceive mid bass (around 100Hz) as deep bass, so this fools a lot of people.
"...but they will have a crystal-clear, completely flat, frequency response across the entire audible range". No. They won't. No speaker has anything close to a flat frequency response. Go do some waterfall plots of any speaker, regardless of price, and you'll see what I mean. Dips and peaks of 5dB or more are common, even on the most expensive of speakers. And once you go off-center on the speakers, the response gets even worse. To find a speaker that covers the entire audible range, you'll also be looking at a speaker system costing thousands of dollars. I'd look towards Hsu Research [hsuresearch.com] for budget subwoofers that can cover the lower end of the audible spectrum. High frequencies aren't as hard to produce. But, in any event, you won't find any speaker that approaches a linear response.
But, yes, I agree that you should use your own ears to test audio systems. If possible, test them in your own home, as the room in which they are placed makes a significant difference to the sound.
Re:Well.. (Score:2)
Creative Soundworks. (Score:1)
Re:Creative Soundworks. (Score:1)
Never EVER use computer speakers (Score:1)
(I myself use a 2x110W Sony amp with B&W DM601 speakers, really beats the crap out of a 'normal' setup!)
BA-635 Cheap and great-sounding (Score:2)
The price is almost too good to be true: you can find these for about $45 at PriceWatch [pricewatch.com] and Shop.Yahoo [yahoo.com] by searching on "BA635". But these sure as hell don't sound like $45 speakers.
Monsoon Flatpanel (Score:1)
If you want to stand out, along with having great sound, flatpanels are the way to go.
http://www.monsoonpower.com/ [monsoonpower.com]
Related note: these are also the speakers you'll find in Humvees.
Re:Monsoon Flatpanel (Score:2)
However these are not "the speakers you'll find in Humvees". They're sold under the same Monsoon brand, but the flat-panel computer speakers are designed and manufactured by a company called Sonigistix [sonigistix.com] in Richmond, BC, Canada. Last I checked, none of the Sonigistix flat-panel technology had yet made it into an automotive application.
The Monsoon speakers are based on planar-magnetic technology, partially licensed from a company called Eminent Technology [eminent-tech.com]. Sonigistix took the basic design, and adapted it so that the speakers could be mass-produced and sold at a lower price point. Note that there are several other flat-panel computer speakers on the market that do not use planar-magnetic technology, but instead use a "distributed-mode" technology developed by a company called "NXT". In my (biased, as a former Sonigistix employee) opinion, the planar-magnetic ones sound a lot better.
Re:Klipsch = Bad Sound (Score:1)
The way I heard it (from a Klipsch guy, incidentally) was: "No Highs, no Lows, it must be Bose".
cheap speakers (Score:2, Insightful)
I can tell if they sound really crappy, but paying more than $10 filters out most of the really crappy speakers.
What I look for is everything is individually connected and disconnectable. Ideally speaker to speaker wires are disconnectable on both ends, at the least it should be disconnectable on both ends.
If I wanted good sound, I'd use digital out to a real speaker system, but i don't care
digital in on HI-FI amp (Score:2)
why ?
because of all the noise (electrickery noise) that your computer + monitor keyboard
then get yourself a decent amp with 5.1 out
why ?
a decent pre/power amp alows much more to be hooked up
I have a seperate DVD player and TV and I like digital radio and analoge tapes
so this way my needs all come out of the same high quality speakers (which tend to be quite cheap £ wise)
get yourself a good amp is my advice
they dont cost that much if you dont go for a sony (-;
look around their are bargins to be had
(the cost of valves is low so why not make your own
regards
john jones
Headphones (Score:2, Insightful)
I quit using speakers long ago. I still have them, but 99% of the time I wear high-quality, comfortable headphones. Why? I live in an apartment, so I can't run speakers loud enough to satisfy me without pissing off the neighbors. But neighbors aside, I might wear them anyway while playing 3D games. You can hear little things so much better, and it's easier for me to tell the direction of a sound. YMMV.
Re:Headphones (Score:1)
Does anyone have any recommendations for a pair that will keep the sounds in, but won't totally dissociate myself from my surrondings? The lighter the better, too.
Klipsch ProMedia (Score:1)
http://www.klipsch.com/products/promedia/ [klipsch.com] for the ProMedia product line.
Re:Klipsch ProMedia (Score:2)
Re:Klipsch ProMedia (Score:1)
for my computer (Score:1)
So, I went out and bought myself a pair of sennheiser [sennheiser.com] headphones.
Let me assure you, these things rock. If you get a descent model (i've got the HD200) the sound is awsome, and you dont disturb anyone else around you.
Headphone are great (Score:1)
Headroom [headphone.com]
I have about $1000 worth in headphone gear so I'm qualified
Re:Headphone are great (Score:1)
It depends you want toys or audio (Score:3, Interesting)
That is what I consider a bare minimum for acceptable audio, but It'll cost you $3200.00.
Do this if you are mixing music and/or doing non-linear video editing and audio work. Buying that so you can play Quake III or listen to limp Bizzzkit is completely insane. If you want decent quality buy a small amp and some decent speakers. Bose 301's or 201's sound very nice. and you can get a small 50 watt crown amp for around $450.00 including a pair of 201's this would be acceptable audio for home use but still way too much overkill for usual computer use.
As for a subwoofer, a decent speaker system has no need for a subwoofer and they are only used for special effects or to make up for a crappy stereo system.
Not bose (Score:1)
Re:Not bose (Score:1)
Re:Not bose (Score:2)
Me? (Score:1)
Audiophile 24/96 sound card -> ART DI/O digital analog convertor -> NAD C340 integrated amplifier -> Axiom Millenia M3Ti...
Cost you over $1000 though but will whomp ANY multimedia speaker in existence.
Also try the Acoustic Energy Aegios 1 (sp?), they are by far the BEST multimedia speakers available.
Klipsch Promedia 2.1 in Canada? (Score:1)
I'm just trying to get them to Toronto, Canada. It seems klipsch.com only ships to the states, and all the regular sites (e.g. outpost.com) say "not for export". Also, I can't find a local dealer here. Anybody have any leads on these things in Toronto?
Re:Klipsch Promedia 2.1 in Canada? (Score:1)
Also available: Klipsch Promedia 2.1 Speakers - $299.95
Flea Market or Yard Sale (Score:1)
I'm using a 1975 Harmon-Kardon receiver which was once sitting outside on someone's porch. It's not the loudest thing ever, but it makes my Boston Acoustics bookshelf speakers (made well before they got into the "computer speaker" business) sound sweet.
speakers on my pc (Score:1)
Re:speakers on my pc (Score:1)
My setup (Score:1)
The FPS1800 gives good sound all around. My 12's give a nice bass thump, and the 8's make for a good center (although I had to put them behind me.....) Oh well, you can only do so much in a dorm room.
Philips A.3500 (Score:1)
Just bought a set of those today. Not earth-shattering, a simple subwoofer and 4 satellites, analog input only, but sound quality is excellent.
Unless you are a real audiophile, this might just be a set worth looking into. It cost me only HFL 399,- (somewhere between $175,- and $200,-), and it is definitely worth it. Here is the link in case you're curious: A.3500 Speaker Set [philips.com]. They also have more upmarket stuff using the same technology.
Hope this helps,
Martspeaker choices (Score:1)
hope this helps. (Score:1)
First of all good call on the Santa Cruz, it's a really decent part; It costs much, sounds fantastic and it takes up far less resources on Windows boxes (lay off you bastards, I like ALL the games).
I just built another game box using the SC and pulled myCambridge Soundworks DTT3500 [creative.com]s (5.1 digital) off the other box that was using the SoundBlaster Live! Platinum. Even without the optical out the versa jack/din digital worked great and really sounds magnificent. I would hazard to say that the DTT3500s sound better for music and games on the Turtle beach part then did on Creative Labs part.
Now the other part of the story... so since Klipsch is releasing 500watt ProMedia 5.1s, the 400 watt 4.1 version is much cheaper, so I lit out to BestBuy (of all freaking places) and picked up a set. The Klipsch ProMedia 4.1s are the best speakers I have ever heard for the money. Yeah, you can get some Polk Audios or B&Ws or whatever and spend $600 per speaker and have sound engineers come over and dance a little audio geek dance or whatever...
But I am telling you this; find a store that has a good return policy on Klipsch ProMedia 4.1 [klipsch.com], after listening to them you will not be taking them back. Or you could wait and check into the ProMedia 5.1s that, from what I understand, take the product to an entirely higher stratum.
My kick arsen setup! (Score:1)
Aiwa Mini System (Score:1)
also in my plans is to hook up a crossover and a pair of 12 inch subs to my system so i can make DVD watching much more fun
if your just needing some decent speakers...i recommend the Harmon/Kardon's that come with dells...they sound good for their small size...
Let me guess... (Score:1)
If so, WHY BOTHER with getting $500 worth of speakers? You're sacrificing sound quality right there with the media you have chosen, so why get some outrageously expensive computer speakers or even worse, a dedicated amp/component stereo system?
Just head down to your local computer store, try out a few 'good' speaker systems, and buy what you can afford. My Altec-Lansing ACS54's have worked fine for me.
Computer speakers ALL sound like crap (Score:1)
The quality of the speakers is limited by the (Score:1)
Try iZotope, a WinAmp plug in. It will take your speakers to places your sound card is not allowed to go.
What Computer Speakers Do You Use? (Score:1)
If you insist on top notch sound but don't want headphones, then you'll need to get a quality external amplifier and monitor speakers. Previous writers have mentioned NAD and Crown amps. I've used these brands and there are others which are good too. From the price range you mention, I don't think there's any danger of you falling into the clutches of the tube-snobs. Any good quality solid state amp of adequate power will do. Speaking of power, inefficient personal equipment rated at 500 watts is silly puffery. Up close and personal, one (1) watt of radiated power is LOUD. My first career was in music and early on I formed a preference for the efficiency and response of JBL speakers. Used (not abused) equipment will be fine here, and save you a bundle.
Setup Instructions (Score:1)
Any thoughts?
Re:Setup Instructions (Score:1)
Computer Speakers (Score:1)
I don't work for any of those outfits, but thanks to a Scottish heritage, I do enjoy a good buy.
Good luck on your shopping and let us know what you finally get.
Tannoy Reveals (Score:1)
http://www.tannoy.com/product.cfm?D=2&ID=47
Married a musician (Score:1)
My friend has the Harmon Kardon sound sticks and subwoofer for his iMac. The sound very good. But my set up will kill small animals at 50 yards.