Fujitsu Releases Specs For Hackable Robot 166
S. Allen writes: "According to this article, Fujitsu will release the specifications to their RT-Linux based humanoid robot next week to encourage development and research. The article states, 'The software used to program Hoap-1 will run on RT-Linux -- a version of the open-source operating system that is designed for robotic applications, as well as data acquisition and systems control functions. Simulation software will let users test their code before letting it loose on Hoap-1'"
Re:Significance (Score:2, Insightful)
Robot Arm (Score:1)
Crash messages (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Crash messages (Score:1)
Re:Crash messages (Score:2)
Re:ROBOT POST (Score:1, Offtopic)
diff -u post1 post2
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
ENEMY == HUMAN
IF SIGHT = HUMAN THEN
- KILL HUMAN
+ POKE HUMAN
OR ELSE LOOK HUMAN
DIE;
Re:I May Be Stupid! (Score:2)
RTLinux is a hard real-time operating system that handles time-critical tasks and runs Linux as its lowest priority execution thread. In RTLinux, a small hard-realtime kernel shares one or more processors with standard Linux. This allows the system to run accurately timed applications to perform data acquisition, systems control and robotics, while still serving as a standard Linux workstation. - from RTLinux [rtlinux.org]
I wouldn't say you're stupid, but isn't typing "www.rtlinux.org" easier than posting a question on Slashdot?
Re:I May Be Stupid! (Score:2)
They also provide preemptive multitasking, where a program can use a interrupt or similar service to get to the head of the ready queue, rather than the back.
Also, the treatment of memory provides for some unique interprocess communications techniques that are ONLY available under certain RTOS environments.
In essence, it's not the LINUX that is real time, but the OS, which gives the LINUX a share of processor time/memory, which allows for a linux style interface to a real time system.
Some more links... (Score:3, Informative)
Artificial Malevolence? (Score:1)
Let's hope it's good stuff. How stupid would you feel being strangled by a rogue bot?
gee, and I thought the Aibo was expensive (Score:2)
Still, maybe that's a bargin to robotics researchers, would-be world dictators and the robot-porn industry. I think it's priced well beyond the reach of most OS developers.
Of course, it would make a great entry for BattleBots.
Re:gee, and I thought the Aibo was expensive (Score:1)
I can see the future (Score:2)
nothing special (Score:2, Informative)
More info? (Score:1)
ikkle (Score:3, Funny)
Re:ikkle (Score:1)
Re:ikkle (Score:1)
Re:ikkle (Score:1)
Vote Early and Often (Score:1, Offtopic)
The city would no dought buy 1000's
Re:Vote Early and Often (Score:1)
The President says, "Well, I'm the leader of the free world, I should stay in the boat."
The pope says, "I am a religious icon for 1 billion people, I should stay in the boat!"
"Guys, guys" Daley pipes up, "Let's do this democratically! We'll all write a name of who should stay, and put it in my hat. Whoever gets the most votes, gets to stay in the boat."
The votes were cast, the results tallies, and Mayor Daley won by 97 votes.
Re:Vote Early and Often (Score:1)
A patented Linux and an expensive robot.. (Score:2)
I want Linux used in business and science applications, but not when a firm is likely to restrict the most media-genic and lucrative uses, such as this robot, to a closed Linux.
This will popularize Linux, but the visibility, and the profits, will go to a particular group of Linux developers who tend to stand apart from the rest of the community.
In other words, the nerds who fall in love with this robot will also drift further away from the open Linux cultures; any use RTLinux gets is an attack on the open Linux culture.
Re:A patented Linux and an expensive robot.. (Score:2)
Re:A patented Linux and an expensive robot.. (Score:1)
Mmmkay!
- Steeltoe
Re:A patented Linux and an expensive robot.. (Score:1)
Oh... I know what I'm gonna do with mine... (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Oh... I know what I'm gonna do with mine... (Score:1)
Umass videos (Score:4, Interesting)
Press release with pic (Score:2)
Re:Press release with pic (Score:1)
Not that it matters anyway, but you think that they'd show an actual setup, and not a cute marketing picture.
Re:Press release with pic (Score:1)
I mean, come on, guys! Do you do this with everything? I can just imagine you compressing your milk with high-pressure air, or compressing a loaf of bread with a bottle jack to see if it's gone off...
Robots and Carnage. (Score:1)
Just a passing brain cramp, but it should be interesting to think about.
Robot work force? (Score:2, Funny)
Of course we know that childern provide a better value work force than robots, but what about those pesky adults, in the western world it won't be hard to cut expences....
I used to love the idea of making a bipod robot when I was younger, now I they seem scarey... are we making suicide bombers for the west? I'm going to stop now...
Can you hack an AIBO ? (Score:1)
And I'am too dumb to find it on YaExAltahoocitevista...
Is This Really a Good Idea? (Score:3, Funny)
I don't know that I'd want to buy a robot if I knew hackers could take control of it. The consequences of hackers infiltrating a robot could range from the merely annoying to the catastrophic (especially if the robot in question is equipped with a rotary saw, a la BattleBots).
As well, has anybody assessed the national security risks associated with hackable robots, in light of the recent terror attacks?
Re:Is This Really a Good Idea? (Score:1)
Secondly hackable means that they're going to let you get into the guts of it, the programming, the hardware. This is a good thing for a number of reasons: cutting training costs, improvement, and flexibility to name a few.
Thirdly, in its present form, it is merely an expensive toy. It is not going to be used in production in General Motors, and is really too small to do any damage. It will probably end up in some university lab hooked to a Java front end that you can control through your browser.
Lastly, in order to have it cause any real damage, you would have to break into the controlling computer, and send it your own commands. This could take a while, and the first time the robot appears to be moving on its own, you just unplug it. If it were my machine and my robot, I wouldn't have it hooked to the web. It would be too expensive for someone to walk it off my desk or down the stairs.
Open source and hackable is merely a term used to say "We're not going to tell you how to play with it". It means they want you to pull it apart, change it, make it do things that they never even thought of, and most importantly, learn from it! You are not going to see an army of these things patrolling the street, killing everything in its path. And even if the absurd does happen, get out your golf clubs and have a blast.
Re:Is This Really a Good Idea? (Score:1)
I don't know that I'd want to buy a COMPUTER if I knew hackers could take control of it. The consequences of hackers infiltrating a COMPUTER could range from the merely annoying to the catastrophic.
As well, has anybody assessed the national security risks associated with hackable COMPUTERS, in light of the recent terror attacks?
Re:Is This Really a Good Idea? (Score:1)
1) Hackable == Customizable, Hackable != Secure
2) Robot cannot control plane, USB cord not long enough
3) You don't have to buy it
4) Webservers don't crash planes, Control Towers are extremely difficult to hack (I don't think it's ever been reported, not sure how much the systems are tied together, and pilot still has final say over where he's going to put the plane)
5) The thing's just over a foot tall!
Re:Is This Really a Good Idea? (Score:1)
1) Hackable == Customizable, Hackable != INsecure
Re:Is This Really a Good Idea? (Score:2)
This reply is dripping with sarcasm, insightfull +1... go back and read this again... funny +1...definitely...
Re:Is This Really a Good Idea? (Score:1)
Hacking means playing with, not subversing. You must be a reporter to have gotten it soo wrong.
If true... (Score:1)
Just his 0.2 yards 8|
more info (Score:3, Informative)
http://pr.fujitsu.com/en/news/2001/09/10.html [fujitsu.com]
Re:more info (Score:2)
http://www.automation.fujitsu.com/jp/products/lig
It appears the device runs on a 300Mhz pentium
More info wanted. (Score:2, Interesting)
It's a CD changer for a CD burner. [kettering.edu] (My sincere appoligies for slashdotting their webserver.)
My original goal was to create a cheap robot that:
can lift a fresh CD using suction cups (not shown in picture)
use eject & eject -t commands to open & close CD tray
burn CD via shell script
when finished, switch CDs and start all over
drive mechanism using cheap rotating threaded rod (worm drive)
wooden frame (cheap & easy to build)
use Jeremy Elson's Parapin [freshmeat.net] program to control the device via parallel port
goal 1 - make it cheaper than $50 to build. using easy to find parts
goal 2 - make it easy for others to build.
The ultimate hack would be to combine it with a MP3 database, napster, perl script,and wget to download and burn the billboard top 40 (or similar concept)
A project like this is not meant to be practical.
Just something fun that hasn't been done before. Yes, I have seen a similar lego robot that works with a home audio system, but it only had about 7 disks available, it looked like a tough mechanism to integrate with a Computer tower, and the basic lego mindstorms sets sell for about $200.00
Comments/suggestions/related links welcome and strongly encouraged.
Re:More info wanted. (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.mitt.demon.co.uk/gadgets/servo.html [demon.co.uk]
Servos have a suprising amount of power, actually. I keep meaning to get some more of them and make a four legged robot.
Re:More info wanted. (Score:1)
~brad3378 [kettering.edu]
What's up with /. editors (Score:1, Troll)
Now zdnet featuring this old news and got spotlighted? What's up with you editors?
So it isn't a worthy news until your Greatest ZDNet featuring it?
Mod me down if you like, you ZDNet dude.
B.I.O. Bugs and Insecto Bots (Score:2)
Any chance either toy might be nifty for more than 15 minutes (unlike the Furby we all bought after that article in Wired before its release)?
Way off topic. (Score:1, Funny)
Go to Freshmeat [freshmeat.net]
Read the names of the first two projects. What are the odds?
Maybe it'll be a little further down, but you'll know the ones I mean.
Jonathan
Re:Way off topic. (Score:1)
I can see the -1 hovering, go ahead...
Re:Way off topic. (Score:1)
by Bob Yetman - Monday, September 17th 2001 21:06 EDT
Category: Communications
About: suck is used to grab news from a remote NNTP news server and bring it to your local machine (without using the NEWNEWS command). It is designed for a small, partial news feed.
Changes: New SSL and -bP options.
License: Public Domain - Release focus: Minor feature enhancements
dic 0.6
by Ákos Putz - Monday, September 17th 2001 21:06 EDT
Category: System
About: dic is a simple, console-based disk catalogizer. It can easily add disks to the catalog, search in the catalog, list the files on a disk, search for files, automatically retrieve found files without requiring you to manually navigate through the source media, and more.
Changes: A much faster substring search mode, new user-defined filters for extracting useful (searchable) information from files while adding disks, and a new Debian package.
License: GNU General Public License (GPL) - Release focus: Major feature enhancements
Some more info (Score:1)
http://pr.fujitsu.com/en/news/2001/09/10.html [fujitsu.com] - a generic article with a picture. Discusses specs.
It looks like it will be rather expensive, they have set the price to "open" with a sales expectation of 100 over three years. It has 20 degrees of movement. It uses RTLinux(like the other article mentioned) and uses USB to act as the "Direct Interface and Robot's Internal Network." also, it mentions that HOAP-1 stands for Humanoid for Open Architecture Platform
Imagine - a small army. A cluster if you will. wouldn't that be "wyrd"
I'd like to state the obvious... (Score:2)
We just haven't figured out what to do with them yet.
Re:I'd like to state the obvious... (Score:1)
Robots today are like computers were yesterday... We are underestimating their use and capability.
We just haven't figured out what to do with them yet.
You mean we've figured out what to do with computers? Like Windows, Solitaire and stuff?
I, Fujistu-bot (Score:1)
A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
I can see a few scientists overlooking this little ruleset and losing some limbs to Fujitsubot 2001.
Re:I, Fujistu-bot (Score:2)
Besides, the laws where suggested for robots that were semi-autonomous thanks to artificial intelligence. We're not anywhere near that yet.
Software is the key (Score:2, Interesting)
I bet their idea is to have generic robots that can do many different tasks base solely on the software; rather than spending lots of money building very specialized robots that can only do one or two things. Actually this is just like real human! We are more or less the same physically, but we are trained to do many different tasks without growing extra arms or eyes.
So if you work in an university with a good size robotic research group you can probably convince them to send one to you for free
Anybody got any links to a picture of this thing? (Score:1)
Maybe I'm missing something obvious but, I'd like to see what this device looks like.
STIQUITO - Build your own robot! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:STIQUITO - Build your own robot! (Score:1)
As much as I enjoyed building it, the main problem with the Stiquito is that it doesn't come with a processor/controller of any kind and finding one small enough to fit the body was more than I could handle. (I'm a software person not a hardware person)
By the way, when I bought my book there was only one on the market, so I don't know how the've improved over the past couple of years.
Pricy! (Score:1)
Expensive Robot (Score:2)
Who is going to have the means to purchase these? labs, schools, corporations. not you and me brotha...
We're 5-15 years away from a robotic revolution (Score:1)
Now we're REALLY close to AI. About 100,000 man hours away. Or less if we use already known components.
Just 2 things are needed: 3d robotic imagination, and sensory devices to interpret the world.
If the robot can understand the world, then it can use a game playing algorithm to make the best method of achieving a goal via subgoals....
And for natural language understanding, just picture old school Zork. If it doesn't understand what you're saying, it will either guess in context, or ask you flat out what you mean.
Then you finally can get computers to read books etc. The difference between a robot and a human are the top level goals. Humans are controlled by pleasure and pain chemicals: drugs, learning, sweets, sex, moving, sports. Robots will need the top level goals given by humans, so robots can be used as slaves. "Hey robot go shovel the snow out of my driveway."
More crap about this at:
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~sager/
I can TOTALLY code this from start to finish, but it would take me like 20 years. If someone gave me a 3d engine, I could probably get it done in 5-10... But if I had smart people working with me, its no more than a 2 year task.
Anything more than PR available? (Score:2)
I think it's great, but we need more info.