I guess Ubuntu is moving away from the gnu license. which has served it well for many years. Remember when Bsd unix had a license where companies could copy it and not contribute back to the source. Apple took that and ran with it. I wonder how much was lost to the world when it was relicensed under Apple's license. Ubuntu is going to the MIT license, which is nice, but not as nice as gnu as it doesn't require keeping any improvements open.

Regular TV had a set of commercials every 1/2 hour or 15 minutes. Youtube has commercials every video, sometimes 4 minutes of commercials, and sometimes during videos, and the creators can only support themselves by having sponsors so there is another block of time going to a commercial. In order to watch 1 hour of youtube you must watch 2 hours of youtube.

It says my time is up, will restart in 6 hours. Work for nearly a full work day? I think not!

I don't know why but in the last year, i'm seeing old content, like old tv shows or old videos I've seen before. Between the old garbage and the shorts the home page seldom has my interests.

Copyright is all about copying and reselling(at any price) material. I don't understand what the big deal is, as meta is not reselling the material. It is digesting it and using it. Which is the same as any person would do when reading a book. As far as I can see there is no copyright infringement as they aren't reselling it.

and it's not going well. For example the AI would create a description of the video, that gets many things wrong or misstates things, like "This guy" when it's a girl, or "The maker" when they are doing a disassembly of something.
Also it's adding in default comment replies, often complaining about the algorithm.

If their expenses have been going up it's only because of adding things that nobody wants.

Would this project take open source projects under it's wing, and do things like provide corporate support, corporate dev (for the things that aren't interesting), maintenance etc. Would this be a way to
1. provide open source projects development money even if they aren't part of the post open world.
2. provide systematic methods of corporate sponsorship

Also would this be a new license, replacing other ones out there, (if so how would/could that happen with many developers on a single project). or would this be an additional license?

I wonder how this would affect the following case.
Once upon a time I bought a cool clock from Sony that you could download cool faces and software that made it do different things.
Then sony shut down the servers.
Then my cool clock was just a clock with nothing special except an expensive purchase price.

if they made the active tab bright pink or something so differentiate it from the row of other tabs that I've got open.

If apple is insisting that payment must be made through them for something that might not involve them at all, this becomes an antitrust issue does it not?

Elon roled out AI at Tesla with great fanfare, talking about the DOJO and so on. Then he made an AI company that took resources that should have gone to Tesla. Now he want's Tesla to pay him for the AI company. That sounds like a great business plan. Maybe he shouldn't have gotten that stock compensation afterall.

You could be right. So much movie writing these days is just crap.

then the power went out. Not sure if I'm going back. I thnk netflix needs better stuff. It seems all anime (cartoon person running and yelling in every fucking preview) Dubbed so badly it's unwatchable or just plain stupid "comedy" shows that aren't funny.
Starting to wonder why I subscribe.

https://blog.google/technology...

I've been saying for the last decade that AI is the new warzone. China has been using it to track people, and google/meta/microsoft have been using it to track people.
Anyone saying that AI needs to slow down, doesn't understand the reality. If we slow down, we fall behind.