Comment Re:Are not hidden cameras illegal in California? (Score 3, Interesting) 42
He had permission from the building manager. Think about it: if it was illegal, how could any businesses or homes have any security camera?
He had permission from the building manager. Think about it: if it was illegal, how could any businesses or homes have any security camera?
Right.
It takes both money and asserts power and control against states specifically. The compliance policy, the nanosecond it's enforced, breaches the 10th. The conspiracy to breach the 10th would be mooted.
And yes, it's mob boss shit. And what he's done to universities also breaches numerous US Constitutional Amendments, but because universities are at the nipple of federal dollars, they dare not move. This is the universities' problem, the subservience and fealty to new royalty. That they don't litigate effectively shows the strength of their spine.
The MAGA governors in lockstep with The Executive are now losing battles, viz Indiana's rejection of redistricting for gerrymandering purposes.
Look where DOGE is today, disbanded and debunked, leaving only damage and disservice in its wake, many battles in the courts lost, and no happiness left behind.
There are ways to prevent a race to the bottom. Law with spine, rather law with genuflection will turn the tide, as it has in the past.
Ah, we disagree. Read the 10th Amendment. We can add the Commerce Clause, and add a side dash of grab-and-go (read your law books).
Thanks otherwise for the kind and thoughtful words; I know they took a lot of effort.
It's PR and fodder for the fan club. It's plainly illegal, and yet another slide into corruption as the AI movement loots treasuries and pockets, while producing nothing but high-wattage goo.
Hahahahaha you think nationalists care about people other than themselves hahahhahahahahhahaha
You mean unlike a congressional parasite, or a PPP parasite, or a CEO parasite?
Use preview.
No, every day now.
More people fail every day.
Unsustainable means it fails eventually, not on a specific day.
I wouldn't call plant-based meat alternatives "healthy" unless your idea of healthy is dying of salt poisoning.
Meat is delicious, but a vegan diet is perfectly healthy.
I'm talking specifically about the meat substitutes that try to taste like meat. There are ways to have a healthy vegan diet, but a lot of the plant-based burgers and fake meat tend to be loaded up with large amounts of sodium salt. So switching to those because you think they are healthier may actually be way worse than not doing so.
"the proper solution is obviously to have a formal, controlled, actually viable work visa system for economic migrants"
Yes, we should definitely formalize and legalize our tampering with other countries to produce cheap labor we can abuse.
Wait, what?
Typically, for people with low vision, the serifs significantly degrade legibility.
This isn't actually true. For screens with low resolution, because of the way scaling works, serifs can degrade legibility, but because of the way human brains and eyes do superresolution with micro-eye movements to compensate for poor visual acuity, serifs should not degrade readability even if your vision is blurry.
More to the point, I have to scale up sans-serif fonts a lot more than serif fonts to work well with my eyesight. So I'm saying this from personal experience.
Serifs are _only_ for ease of reading if your printing technology is not very good. As soon as you do not have that problem, sans-serif fonts are significantly superior.
You actually have it entirely backwards. Serifs require a higher resolution to render, or else thin lines can disappear entirely. That's why some people incorrectly think that sans-serif fonts are more readable on screen; their screens simply aren't good enough to render serifs properly. (Pedantically, this means that sans-serif fonts are more readable on crappy screens.)
But if you have a screen with a high enough resolution to render them properly, fonts with serifs significantly increase reading comprehension and speed of reading for large blocks of normal-sized text. (citation, original book) And while it is possible to reduce the difficulty of reading sans-serif fonts through careful design, IMO, there's no good reason to believe that a version of Calibri with serifs would not still be more readable.
To be fair, some serif fonts sometimes need 600 DPI to prevent lines from disappearing entirely because of poor font scaling software.
But the flip side is that assuming the serifs don't disappear because of scaling deficiencies, they are way more readable at small font sizes, particularly for people whose vision is not perfect. It is dramatically more legible to me than Calibri.
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income. -- Errol Flynn Any man who has $10,000 left when he dies is a failure. -- Errol Flynn