(see subject)

Oh, all you'll get is funny looks? Really? You must not follow the news much. Teachers who were porn stars in former careers get fired from their tapes being found, even when it's 20 yrs ago. People get driven out of communities. My parents faced an angry mob because my dad threw away fucking playboys he found when they moved into their 1973 house. Literally an angry mob of neighbors. And this is 20 miles from the nation's capital. You are utterly full of shit that all anyone will get is a look. A 17 year old black kid gets a blowjob from a 15 year old classmate: He goes to jail and has to register as a sex offender. They're trying to make it illegal to film yourself without using a condom in California. The Obama Administration is still trying to throw people in jail for obscenity for publishing straight porn. Kids who take naked pictures of themselves are being labeled sex offenders. People still fight to stop strip clubs (let alone gay clubs). Straight sex only gets a few looks? bullshit.

I was unaware that straight people could post all the sex tapes they want without repercussion.

By the wall, bullshit comparison. No sex tape was released in this case.

You don't seem to understand the role technology plays in transforming how societies work.

You are basically giving extra protection to some people - but not all. I'm not cool with that. It doesn't matter what somebody else thinks. If baggy pants are demonized compared to khakis, and I tell the world you wear baggy pants, is that somehow more evil than telling the world you wear khakis? You're reaching way too deep. A 3rd party's reaction to information does not turn information from acceptable into hate crime.

This 30 day sentence is the right amount. Smart judge, for once.

Or just use TOR. And don't say "tor can be compromised". That's only true if they are already monitoring you. if you're doing something you've told nobody about and not already being monitored, you're fine.

You do realize being a garbage man or taxi driver or farmer is more dangerous than being a cop, right?

this article would seem to indicate 98% is closer to what actually happens, tho law only mandates 75% in Vegas.

Because they revised their numbers before the IPO, but didn't give those revisions to the people buying it. That's fraud in some peoples' minds. It's mis-representing. It's not buyer beware, it's give buyer something different than you said you were giving them. Your standing is being sold something on false pretenses.

That's because slot machines don't mislead on the odds. They have regulations and have to have specific odds - 98% payback for Vegas slots for example. They are regularly inspected to ensure that. You lose 2% playing slots in the long run, basically. The odds are known. They aren't presented as different numbers than they actually are, and are public knowledge for all casinos.