How I wish I had mod points ...

Don't feed trolls.

Parent deserves a +1 Funny upmod ...

Swilden opined:

Seconded ...

... and I move the previous question.

Fly766 noted:

Upmod +1 Informative, please ...

FTFY ...

Retired Chemist opined:

We never went back to Luna because Nixon hated the manned space program. It was strongly associated with JFK (whom Nixon also hated), and Nixon's telephone call to the Eagle's crew while the world watched the original Moonwalk on live TV didn't change the public perception that the technological triumph of the 20th century was Kennedy's accomplishment, not his.

Since the manned space program was important to the defense industry's bottom line (and their contributions to Republican lawmakers made them politically indispensible), Tricky Dick couldn't afford to simply choloform it, so he directed NASA to concentrate its manned spaceflight efforts on LEO missions like Spacelab and publicity stunts like Apollo/Soyuz. A fresh programe of manned missions to Luna was thereby relegated to "nice to have, maybe someday" - and, gradually, the voters forgot it had ever seemed important ...

The mice refused to use them, because, in order to do so, they would've been forced to sign up for Meta accounts ...

DarkOx lied:

Except that, due to generations of gerrymandering at the state level, very close to 2/3 of state legislatures are firmly in the claws of the Republican party, which would guarantee permanent GOP control of the Senate, with a large enough majority to allow the them to amend the Constitution at whim.

What was that about "frankly anti-democratic behavior" again ... ?

Posting to undo accidental downmod of parent.

(I meant to mod it +1 Funny ... )

ShanghaiBill blathered:

Nonsense.

It was the defense industry-style cost-plus project management mindset, and Chicago School MBA management principles that killed them, not SpaceX's engineering team.

There's a good reason that Boeing's C suite has decided it wants no part of fixed-price contracts in the future: those idiot children have no idea how to make money on those terms. And - surprise! - outsourcing, buck-passing, and treating highly-skilled engineering teams with massive accumulated institutional knowledge as completely fungible assets doesn't work, either ...

Malay2bowman misspoke:

AOL didn't open the gates of Hell, flooding the Internet with clueless, unwashed dimwits, until September-ish1994.

I remember the horrifying event - and its timing - well, because LAN Times (a McGraw-Hill biweekly publication devoted mainly to servicing the Novell NetWare community) began publishing my @internet column in early April that year.

@internet began as a kind of "Baedeker's for the Internet," aimed at my peers in the Novell universe, who regularly assured me that they knew the Internet was important, but didn't have the time to figure out how to use it by themselves. It was a wildly successful feature that started my career in computer journalism - entirely by accident, after I cornered LAN Times' then-editor-in-chief, Susan Breidenbach, at the SFNUG Christmas party in December 1993 to urge her to initiate just such a regular feature. (Silly me, I expected that, were I successful in pitching the idea, she would assign it to one of her existing staffers, and I could bask in the virtuous feeling of having done a Good Thing for my fellow LAN administrators. Imagine my surprise when she replied, "It sounds like something that could be worth trying. So, when can I expect your first column?" instead.)

AOL's horrible, primitive Web browser (Windows-only, if you please) was nonetheless capable of allowing a million and a half entirely-unprepared newbies to stumble around on the Web without a clue among them about how to behave on the Internet. Overnight, it was as if what had been a relatively-civilized community of relatively-clueful, mostly-techie users was invaded by ignorant, barbarian hordes tromping through our marble palaces with muddy boots, blinking stupidly, and drooling all over the furniture.

It was an utterly classic illustration of the tragedy of the commons - and the experience has been branded in my soul, ever since ...

sulfide complained:

It's very possible your phone number previously belonged to someone who donated to Obama's first campaign for president. I know mine did, because many of the Democrat-for-any-office spam emails I get refer to her by name as "Ruth" - and the SMS texts frequently conclude with a "friendly" reminder that "You agreed to receive these messages," even though I did no such thing. Also, "text stop to opt out" doesn't work, because so many different Democratic fundraising organizations have purchased that same, 16-year-old list that attempting to unsub from one of them is like trying to empty the ocean with an eyedropper.

BTW, I've had this same phone number for a decade now ...

backslashdot snarked:

Despite the association of the term with Nazis and other racial supremecist ideologues, the actual, origiinal Arians were ethnic Persians, none of whom had blue eyes or blond hair (which they acquired only through interbreeding with the mostly-Greek mercenaries whom Alexander the Great left behind as garrison troops, when he moved on from pacifying the easternmost Persian satrapies to conquering the Indus Valley).

I've always been amused at the worship of "Aryan purity" by Oswald Moseley and the Nazis he inspired, given that the actual ethnic Arians were what Moseley and his fellow "white man's burden-style" British racists would definitely have referred to as "wogs."

dunkelfalke observed:

Absolutely.

And you can blame Milton and Rose D. Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics for Neutron Jack - and Ayn Rand for all three of them and their short-sighted management philosophy ...