This is just not true. It shows that you are not familiar with other voting systems. Currently, people in the US almost have to choose D or R, because they know that no other party has a chance. Consider a simple example of another system: Let's say that a state has 10 seats in the House of Representatives. Votes are cast for several different parties. Party 1 gets 30% of the votes - they get 3 seats. Party 2 and party 3 each get 20% of the votes - they each get 2 seats. Parties 4, 5 and 6 each get 10% of the votes - they each get 1 seat.
If people knew that smaller parties could actually win, and participate in the political process? I guarantee you that people would vote for parties other than D and R.
Their model seems to be people who don't use a car enough to warrant owning one, but want the convenience of having access to one and are willing to pay a premium for it.
Premium? As a (former I suppose) member, it was very much the not premium option, rather the cheap option. For occasional use, way cheaper than owning a car, way cheaper for odd jobs than hiring one too. Also hiring cars is an obnoxious pain in the arse on the whole.
... that it "falls victim to a cost of living crisis", then maybe something was severely wrong with the business model to begin with. Sharing cars should be substantially cheaper than "owning one's own" - if it is not, then why would anyone want to "share" it with strangers?
OK, not being an Angry Individualist American On The Internet(tm) I'm not pathologically allergic to "strangers". With that aside, it is a lot cheaper. The alternative to zipcar is generally speaking not using a car at all. The alternative is therefore largely speaking free. I have had good use out of a cargo bike hire, which is also much much cheaper.
Before you argue about the necessity of a car, just remember that fully one third of Americans do not have a license, and in the UK that number is one half. In the area of London, where I am, over 65% of households don't have regular access to a car.
Yeah probably. I'm on Firefox with ublock, no script and privacy badger. I never see obnoxious ads.
I don't really understand the nerd rage against Firefox. Sure they've made some missteps, and I don't really like where the management of Mozilla is heading these days, but literally every alternative is objectively worse.
Works fine for me... Try noscript?
This is the beta build. So it IS the QA/QC testing. A total nothingburger story.
They're also cracking down on HDCP compatibility. My video glasses now also don't work with downloaded Netflix shows which is obnoxious. So of course I'm just going to go find an ISO and the more ISOs I download the less incentive I have to actually pay Netflix for something that doesn't work.
It's not like these anti-piracy efforts are doing anything to stop a perfect stream from being available 1 hour after airing.
Purely from a technology perspective, they're probably feasible in that physically if we really really wanted to build them, we could. From an everything else perspective, they're worse than pointless (it's used to try and discredit feasible projects).
China (and also the UK lolololololol) is installing 220mph rated conventional high speed rail tracks. Sure, not under an hour, but still under 2. That's still about an hour and a half (e.g. London to Dublin) gate to gate plane with all the faffing around, never mind the airport faff.
And yet somehow people make 300mile trips by plane and train all the time.
The issue is the noise, and you don't need a vacuum tube to solve it.
You'll need a lot of power to do that, but there's no theoretical reason why it's impossible. Not sure I'd want to design a tunnel in a compressible flow regime though!
It's kind of a suprising to me that it was a fungus and not a plant that developed this ability. After all, plants already feed on elecromagnetic radiation.
The UK is one of the halfway countries that still uses miles and gallons for vehicles
Only for fuel consumption, but not fuel. Which his funny because we dispense fuel (and just about everything else) in liters, so MPG is an entertainingly irritating figure. We should use MPL obviously.
Pandering to Reform voters is pointless, they are not going to vote Labour unless they go full fascist.
Probably not even then. If you're going to vote for a racist, why not go for the real deal instead of a half arsed knockoff where you're not even sure if they're really committed or just doing it to try and impress.
If it has syntax, it isn't user friendly.